Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after preoperative chemoradiation therapy and low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision for locally advanced rectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after preoperative chemoradiation plus low anterior resection and total mesorectal excision remain uncertain. OBJECTIVE: To analyze, the associated risk factors with colorectal anastomosis leakage following preoperative chemo-radiation therapy and low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 1992 and December 2000, 92 patients with rectal cancer were treated with 45 Gy of preoperative radiotherapy and bolus infusion of 5-FU 450 mg/m2 on days 1-5 and 28-32, six weeks later low anterior resection was performed. Univariate analysis was performed as to find the risk factors for colorectal anastomotic leakage. RESULTS: There were 48 males and 44 females, mean age was 55.8 years. Mean tumor location above the anal verge was 7.4 +/- 2.6 cm. Preoperative mean levels of albumin and lymphocytes were 3.8 g/dL and 1,697/microL, respectively. Mean distal margin was 2.9 +/- 1.4 cm. Multivisceral resection was performed in 11 patients (13.8%), 32 patients (35%) had diverting stoma. Mean preoperative hemorrhage was 577 +/- 381 mL, and 27 patients (24%) received blood transfusion. Ten patients (10.9%) had anastomotic leakage. No operative mortality occurred. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage were: gender (male) and tumor size > 4 cm. Three patients of the group without colostomy required a mean of six days in the unit of intensive care; mean time of hospital stay of patients with and without protective colostomy was 12.4 +/- 4.5 days vs. 18.3 +/- 5.2 days (p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: In male patients with rectal adenocarcinoma measuring > 4 cm, treated by preoperative chemoradiotherapy + low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision, a diverting stoma should be performed to avoid major morbidity due to anastomotic leak.

Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after preoperative chemoradiation therapy and low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision for locally advanced rectal cancer / Factores de riesgo para la fuga anastomótica después de quimio-radioterapia preoperatoria y resección anterior baja con excisión total de mesorrecto para cáncer de recto localmente avanzado

Background. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after preoperative chemoradiation plus low anterior resection and total mesorectal excision remain uncertain. Objective. To analyze, the associated risk factors with colorectal anastomosis leakage following preoperative chemo-radiation therapy and low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Materials and methods. Between January 1992 and December 2000, 92 patients with rectal cancer were treated with 45 Gy of preoperative radiotherapy and bolus infusion of 5-FU 450 mg/m² on days 1-5 and 28-32, six weeks later low anterior resection was performed. Univariate analysis was performed as to find the risk factors for colorectal anastomotic leakage. Results. There were 48 males and 44 females, mean age was 55.8 years. Mean tumor location above the anal verge was 7.4 ± 2.6 cm. Preoperative mean levels of albumin and lymphocytes were 3.8 g/dL and l,697/mL, respectively. Mean distal margin was 2.9 ± 1.4 cm. Multivisceral resection was performed in 11 patients (13.8%), 32 patients (35%) had diverting stoma. Mean preoperative hemorrhage was 577 ± 381 mL, and 27 patients (24%) received blood transfusion. Ten patients (10.9%) had anastomotic leakage. No operative mortality occurred. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage were: gender (male) and tumor size > 4 cm. Three patients of the group without colostomy required a mean of six days in the unit of intensive care; mean time of hospital stay of patients with and without protective colostomy was 12.4 ± 4.5 days vs. 18.3 ± 5.2 days (p = 0.01). Conclusion. In male patients with rectal adenocarcinoma measuring > 4 cm, treated by preoperative chemoradiotherapy + low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision, a diverting stoma should be performed to avoid major morbidity due to anastomotic leak.

Antecedentes. Los factores de riesgo para la fuga de anastomosis colo-rectal después de quimio-radioterapia preoperatoria con excisión total de mesorrecto permanecen aún inciertos. Objetivo. Analizar los factores de riesgo asociados con la fuga o filtración de anastomosis colorrectal que sigue a la terapia de radiación química y a la extirpación anterior baja con total excisión mesorrectal para el cáncer rectal. Materiales y métodos. Entre enero de 1992 y diciembre de 2000, 92 pacientes con cáncer rectal fueron tratados con 45 Gy de radioterapia preoperativa e infusión del bolo de 5'FU450 mg/m² administrados los días 1-5 y del 28-32; seis semanas más tarde, se realizó la extirpación anterior baja. Se llevó a cabo un análisis univariado en cuanto a encontrar los factores de riesgo de la fuga anastomótica colorrectal. Resultados. Se trató a 48 varones y 44 mujeres cuya media etaria fue de 55.8 años. La localización media del tumor arriba del borde anal fue de 7.4 ± 2.6 cm. Los niveles medios preoperativos de albúmina y linfocitos fueron de 3.8 g/dL y 1,697/mL, respectivamente. El margen distal medio fue de 2.9 ± 1.4 cm. La extirpación multivisceral fue realizada en 11 pacientes (13.8%); 32 pacientes (35%) tuvieron una colostomía derivativa. La hemorragia preoperativa media fue de 577 ± 381 mL, y 27 pacientes (24%) recibieron transfusión sanguínea. Diez pacientes (10.9%) tuvieron fuga anastomótica. No hubo ningún deceso quirúrgico. Los factores de riesgo para la fuga anastomótica fueron: el género (masculino) y el tamaño del tumor > 4 cm. Tres pacientes del grupo sin colostomía requirieron una media de seis días en la UTI (Unidad de Terapia Intensiva); el promedio media de la duración hospitalaria de pacientes con y sin colostomía protectiva fue de 12.4 ± 4.5 días contra 18.3 ± 5.2 días (p = 0.01). Conclusión. En pacientes masculinos con adenocarcinoma rectal que mide > 4 cm, tratados mediante radioterapia química preoperativa + extirpación anterior baja con excisión total mesorrectal, debería realizarse una abertura que se desvíe a fin de evitar una mayor mortalidad debida a fuga anastomótica.

Multivisceral resection for colon cancer.

BACKGROUND: There is a lack of appropriate information in regard to the optimal treatment for colon cancer infiltrating neighboring organs. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study is to analyze treatment results and to identify the risk factors of death by cancer in these patients. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 40 patients with colon cancer infiltrating neighboring organs without distant metastases was carried out. Patterns of recurrence and 5-year survival were analyzed. RESULTS: The study included 20 males and 20 females with a median age of 51.5 years. Primary tumor location was as follows: right colon (n = 15); transverse colon (n = 5); left colon (n = 7), and sigmoid (n = 13). In 17 patients, the colon tumor infiltrated the abdominal wall alone or together with neighboring organs and in 23 patients, one or more neighboring organs were infiltrated. Eleven patients (27.5%) developed postoperative complications. Two patients (5%) died during the postoperative period. Microscopic tumor infiltration was demonstrated in 29 patients (72.5%). Tumor stage was as follows: T3,N0 (n = 8); T3,N+ (n = 3); T4,N0 (n = 16), and T4,N+ (n = 13). Overall 5-year survival was 45%. Multivariate analysis shows that the unfavorable risk factors for 5-year survival were neoplastic cell infiltration to neighboring organs, age > 50 years, and lymph node metastases. CONCLUSIONS: The main risk factors for cancer-related failure are neoplastic infiltration to neighboring organs, age > 50 years, and lymph node metastases. In T4 colon cancer, the recurrence pattern was found at local, peritoneal, and distant sites.

Formalin instillation for refractory radiation-induced hemorrhagic proctitis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Radiation proctitis is a common complication after pelvic irradiation. One to five percent of these patients will develop intractable or massive hemorrhagic radiation proctitis that will require repeated hospital admissions and blood transfusions. We evaluated the benefits of instillation of 4% formalin in the management of refractory hemorrhagic radiation-induced proctitis. METHODS: From January 1998 to May 1999, 20 female patients who failed with administration of topical steroids and/or mesalazine were treated with 500 ml of 4% formalin instilled into the rectum in 50-ml aliquots. RESULTS: Median age was 58 years. Eighteen patients had cervical cancer and two, endometrial cancer. These patients received a mean of 7,500 rads to the pelvis. The symptoms began at a mean of 8 months after termination of radiotherapy. Median time of symptomatic rectal hemorrhage was 8 months. Median of blood units previously transfused was six (range: 2-11). Hemorrhage immediately ceased after the 4% formalin instillation in 17 patients. Three patients required formalin instillation repetition with success in one. Overall success was 90%. Median follow-up was 20 months. Five patients had moderate pelvic pain after instillation and one developed rectosigmoideal necrosis that required resection plus Hartmann procedure. Two patients developed rectovaginal fistula and required colostomy, and one thereafter, required abdominoperineal resection en bloc with the posterior wall of the vagina due to pelvis sepsis. CONCLUSIONS: Rectal instillation of 4% formalin is a simple, inexpensive, and efficient treatment for refractory hemorrhagic radiation proctitis.

[Multivariate analysis of risk factors associated with dehiscence of colorectal anastomosis after anterior or lower anterior resection for sigmoid or rectal cancer]. / Análisis multivariado de factores de riesgo asociados a dehiscencia de la anastomosis colorrectal después de una resección anterior o anterior baja por cáncer del sigmoides o del recto.

INTRODUCTION: Clinical anastomotic leakage remains a major problem after anterior or low anterior resection for rectal or sigmoid cancer. OBJECTIVE: To analyze risk factors associated with this complication. MATERIAL AND METHODS: From January 1992 to December 2000, 232 anterior or low anterior resections were performed. An univariate and multivariate analysis were performed as to find the risk factors. RESULTS: There were 122 females and 110 males, mean age was 58.5 +/- 14.1. Tumors were located as follows: low third (n = 10), middle third (n = 104), upper third (n = 52) and sigmoid (n = 66). Ninety-two patients received preoperative radiotherapy +/- chemotherapy. Twenty-six (11.6%) had diabetes mellitus, 52 (22.4%) hypertension and 31 (13.4%) mixed cardiopathy. Forty-six patients (19.8%) had > 90% of tumor obstruction. Mean levels of serum albumin and lymphocytes were 3.7 +/- .62 g/L y de 2,026 +/- 1,576/mm3, respectively. Tumors mean distance from the anal verge was 10.2 +/- 6.7 cm. Colorectal anastomoses were performed with the following techniques: double stapled (n = 92), single stapled (n = 85) and manual (n = 55). Multivisceral resection was performed in 29 patients (12.5%); a diverting colostomy was performed in 54 patients (23.2%). Mean intraoperative haemorrhage was 505.3 +/- 393.5 mL. Mean operative time was 267.4 +/- 83 min. Sixty patients (27.2%) received blood transfusion. Mean tumor size was 4.8 +/- 2.6 cm. Tumor stage was as follows: T0-, T2, N0 (n = 60), T3, T4, N0 (n = 103), any T, N+ (n = 55) y T3-4, N+, M+ (n = 14). Nineteen patients (8.1%) developed clinical anastomotic leakage. No operative mortality was observed. Adverse risk factors for clinical anastomotic leakage were: gender (male), preoperative albumin levels < 3 g/L, preoperative tumor obstruction (> 90%) and distance of the anastomosis from the anal verge (< 7 cm). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with these adverse risk factors a diverting colostomy or ileostomy should be performed, as to avoid fecal peritonitis.