The poor accuracy of D-dimer for the diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection but its potential usefulness in early postoperative infections following revision arthroplasty for aseptic loosening.

BACKGROUND: D-dimer was introduced in 2018 as an alternative biomarker for C-reactive protein (CRP) in the diagnostic of prosthetic joint infection (PJI) criteria of the Musculoskeletal Infection Society. We assessed the accuracy of plasma D-dimer for the diagnosis of early, delayed, and late PJI according to Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) criteria, and whether persistently high levels of D-dimer in cases of aseptic loosening (AL) may be predictive of subsequent implant-related infection. METHODS: A prospective study of a consecutive series of 187 revision arthroplasties was performed at a single institution. Septic (n = 39) and aseptic revisions (n = 141) were classified based on IDSA criteria. Preoperative assessment of CRP, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and D-dimer was performed. Receiver operating curves were used to determine maximum sensitivity and specificity of the biomarkers. The natural progress of D-dimer for AL cases was followed up either until the date of implant-related infection at any time during the first year or 1 year after revision in patients without failure. Clinical outcomes for those AL cases included infection-related failure that required a new surgery or need for antibiotic suppression. RESULTS: Preoperative D-dimer level was significantly higher in PJI cases than in AL cases (p = 0.000). The optimal threshold of D-dimer for the diagnosis of PJI was 1167 ng/mL. For overall diagnosis of PJI, C-reactive protein (CRP) achieved the highest sensitivity (84.6%), followed by erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and D-dimer (82% and 71.8%, respectively). Plasma D-dimer sensitivity was lower for all PJI types. When combinations of 2 tests were studied, the combined use of ESR and CRP achieved the best accuracy for all types of PJI (76.9%). 4.25% of AL cases had implant failure due to implant-related infection during the first year after the index revision arthroplasty, only the cases with early failure maintained high D-dimer levels. CONCLUSIONS: Plasma D-dimer did not offer an improvement over the individual or combined diagnosis for any type of PJI according to IDSA criteria. Persistently raised levels of D-dimer after revision arthroplasty in AL cases might be used to effectively diagnose early postoperative infection.

Immunotherapy of localized, intermediate, and diffuse forms of American cutaneous leishmaniasis.

The clinical efficacy of immunotherapy for localized American cutaneous leishmaniasis with a combination of heat-killed Leishmania mexicana amazonensis promastigotes and viable BCG (bacille Calmette Guérin) has been compared with meglumine antimoniate chemotherapy and with BCG alone in a controlled clinical study in 217 patients. The results in the first two groups were comparable, with greater than 90% clinical cures with an average time of 16-18 w required for healing. The cure rate was considerably lower (42%) and more prolonged in the group receiving BCG alone. Secondary effects were observed in less than 5% of the patients receiving combined immunotherapy or BCG alone. In contrast, 49% of the patients receiving chemotherapy showed side effects. High therapeutic efficacy was also observed using combined immunotherapy in patients with intermediate and diffuse cutaneous leishmaniasis who were previously unresponsive to chemotherapy. Cure or clinical improvement was seen in all 11 patients with intermediate forms of the disease, and marked clinical improvement was observed in 9 of 10 patients with diffuse disease. The results on the efficacy of the combined vaccine in immunotherapy for American cutaneous leishmaniasis provide a strong rationale for studying its effectiveness in prophylactic trials.