Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Br J Radiol ; 95(1139): 20220422, 2022 Oct 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36000672

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Splenic switch-off (SSO) is a validated indicator of adequate vasodilator stress unique to adenosine stress cardiac MR (CMR). Patients in atrial fibrillation (AF) may have a reduced adenosine response due to lower hyperaemic coronary flow reserve and may achieve SSO less frequently versus sinus rhythm (SR). METHODS: 1100 stress CMR studies were identified from a clinical CMR database (2016-2021). 70 patients in AF were propensity score matched to a SR group for age, sex, and body mass index. The adenosine dose administered, symptoms, heart-rate change and scan result were recorded. SSO was evaluated subjectively and semi-quantitatively via changes in splenic and myocardial signal intensity (SI) from rest to stress. RESULTS: SSO occurred significantly less frequently in AF than SR (34/70 [49%] vs 53/70 [76%], p = 0.003). Semi-quantitative assessment supported this, with a smaller splenic SI difference between stress and rest in AF vs SR (median splenic stress:rest peak SI ratio 0.92 [IQR:0.61-1.11] vs 0.56 [IQR:0.45-0.75], p < 0.001). A heart-rate increase >10 bpm predicted visual SSO in SR but not AF. Fewer patients in AF than SR had inducible ischaemia (9/70 [13%] vs 17/69 [25%], p = 0.058). This difference was not driven by inducible ischaemia rates in patients who did not achieve SSO (6/36 [17%] AF vs 4/17 [24%] SR, p = 0.403). CONCLUSIONS: SSO occurs significantly less frequently with AF. This may risk the under diagnosis of inducible ischaemia and requires further assessment. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: SSO, a validated marker of adequate stress in CMR, occurs significantly less frequently in the presence of AF, risking a suboptimal functional assessment of coronary disease.


Subject(s)
Atrial Fibrillation , Coronary Artery Disease , Humans , Adenosine , Atrial Fibrillation/diagnostic imaging , Vasodilator Agents , Heart Rate
2.
Clin Med (Lond) ; 22(1): 45-50, 2022 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35078793

ABSTRACT

Introduction and objectivesThe ongoing respiratory sequelae of COVID-19 pneumonia remain unclear, and the ideal follow-up of these patients is still a work in progress. We describe our experience of using a pre-follow-up multidisciplinary team (MDT) to decide the follow-up stream in patients hospitalised for COVID-19 pneumonia. METHODS: We reviewed all patients with a clinico-radiological diagnosis of COVID-19 admitted to hospital during a 3-month period and assigned a follow-up stream based on British Thoracic Society guidance. RESULTS: We changed the follow-up pathway in 71% (277/392) and refined the pathway in 67% (261/392) of indeterminate cases. We also created an automated process for the general practitioner to book follow-up imaging and will use this process going forward. CONCLUSION: These findings highlight the importance of the MDT review of cases with suspected COVID-19 pneumonia prior to clinic attendance to ensure appropriate patients are followed up and to optimise utilisation of outpatient imaging and clinics.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Ambulatory Care Facilities , Follow-Up Studies , Hospitalization , Humans , SARS-CoV-2
3.
Br J Radiol ; 94(1126): 20201294, 2021 Oct 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34491770

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: This cross-sectional study assessed the accuracy of emergency CT reports at presentation in acute aortic syndrome (AAS). METHODS: Retrospective identification of cases of AAS presenting within a large health board with three acute hospitals receiving adult patients between January 2013 and December 2016. CT studies and reports at presentation were reviewed for discrepancies related to diagnosis, complications and classification by two cardiovascular radiologists. The specialist interest of the original reporters, clinically suspected diagnosis at referral for CT and technical adequacy of the scans were also assessed. False-positive diagnoses were identified and evaluated separately. RESULTS: Among 88 consecutive confirmed cases of AAS at least one discrepancy was identified in 31% (n = 27), including failure to identify or misinterpretation of the AAS itself in 15% (n = 13), haemorrhage in 13% (n = 11), branch involvement in 9% (n = 8), and misclassification in 3% (n = 3). All discrepancies occurred among the 80% (n = 70) of cases reported by radiologists without specialist cardiovascular interest. 26% (n = 23/88) of AAS cases were not clinically suspected at referral for CT and although this was associated with suboptimal protocols, only 51% of CT scans among suspected cases were technically adequate. Seven false-positive diagnoses were identified, three of which related to motion artefact. CONCLUSION: Significant discrepancies are common in the emergency CT assessment of positive cases AAS and this study highlights important pitfalls in CT technique and interpretation. The absence of discrepancies among radiologists with specialist cardiovascular interest suggests both suspected and confirmed cases warrant urgent specialist review. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: CT angiography is central to the diagnosis of AAS; however, significant radiology discrepancies are common among non-specialists. This study highlights important pitfalls in both CT technique as well as interpretation and supports routine specialist cardiovascular imaging input in the emergency assessment of AAS.


Subject(s)
Aortic Arch Syndromes/diagnostic imaging , Diagnostic Errors/statistics & numerical data , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Acute Disease , Aged , Artifacts , Clinical Competence , Cross-Sectional Studies , Emergencies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Specialization
4.
Br J Radiol ; 94(1117): 20200830, 2021 Jan 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32915646

ABSTRACT

Computed tomography (CT) is a valuable tool in the workup of patients under investigation for pulmonary hypertension (PH) and may be the first test to suggest the diagnosis. CT parenchymal lung changes can help to differentiate the aetiology of PH. CT can demonstrate interstitial lung disease, emphysema associated with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, features of left heart failure (including interstitial oedema), and changes secondary to miscellaneous conditions such as sarcoidosis. CT also demonstrates parenchymal changes secondary to chronic thromboembolic disease and venous diseases such as pulmonary venous occlusive disease (PVOD) and pulmonary capillary haemangiomatosis (PCH). It is important for the radiologist to be aware of the various manifestations of PH in the lung, to help facilitate an accurate and timely diagnosis. This pictorial review illustrates the parenchymal lung changes that can be seen in the various conditions causing PH.


Subject(s)
Hypertension, Pulmonary/diagnostic imaging , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Humans , Lung/diagnostic imaging
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...