ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Recognizing learning styles is important to maximizing learning outcomes and many instruments are available to investigate learning styles. OBJECTIVE: To investigate instruments with evidence of validity and reliability most commonly used to evaluate undergraduate healthcare student learning styles globally. METHOD: This scoping review of literature was guided by The Joanna Briggs Institute's recommendations for conducting scoping reviews and the PRISMA-ScR (extension for scoping reviews). The protocol is available for access. DATA SOURCES: Databases searched included Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus. Inclusion criteria were: fully accessible; written in English, Portuguese, or Spanish; and used reliable and/or validated instruments to describe healthcare student learning styles. Articles were excluded if the sample included healthcare professionals, there was no report of the instrument validity and reliability, or was not fully accessible. Data were extracted from each article and entered into Microsoft Office Excel documents for analysis. RESULTS: Forty-seven articles were selected for full review, including cross-sectional, interventional, and longitudinal studies. Eleven instruments were identified with evidence of reliability and validity for assessing undergraduate healthcare student learning styles globally. The most frequently used instruments were Visual, Aural, Read-Write, and Kinesthetic; Kolb's Learning Styles Inventory; and the Honey-Alonso Questionnaire. Most instruments were developed based on a theoretical framework and/or model. CONCLUSION: This scoping review adds to the literature an overview of available instruments which measure healthcare student learning styles with evidence of both reliability and validity. The results indicate the need for further studies to improve learning style instruments for use in intervention studies aimed at improving the teaching-learning process for healthcare students.
Subject(s)
Learning , Students , Cross-Sectional Studies , Delivery of Health Care , Humans , Reproducibility of ResultsABSTRACT
ABSTRACT: Study Design: This mixed-methods study. Objective: To describe action plans related to the behavior of adher-ence to oral antidiabetic medications produced by people with type 2 diabetes mellitus and identify the challenges and coping strategies for the establishment of this behavior. Methods: The study followed-up 44 people with type 2 diabetes mellitus who used oral antidiabetic medications from southeast Brazil. Adults were invited to build action and coping plans based on the Implementation Intention Theory.The plans were quantitative and qualitatively ana-lyzed. Results: Action plans included three major themes: (1) binding oral antidiabetic medication to time markers or the sleep/wake cycle; (2) in specific environments; (3) associated with daily life activities. The motivation for coping with the perceived barriers focused on placing the pills in visible places, asking for help from family mem-bers, establishing a routine and feeding properly. Conclusions: The most effective way to manage satisfactory oral antidiabetic medication adherence seems to be recognizing the perceived barriers by patients. The implementation of specific and individualized action and coping plans to overcome perceived barriers was the stark difference. (AU)
RESUMO: Desenho do estudo: Estudo de método misto. Objetivo: Descrever planos de ação relacionados ao comportamento de adesão aos antidiabéticos orais elaborados por pessoas com diabetes mellitus tipo 2 e identificar as barreiras percebidas e respectivas estratégias de enfrentamento para efetivação desse comportamento. Métodos: O estudo envolveu 44 pessoas com diabetes mellitus tipo 2 que utilizavam antidiabéticos orais na região sudeste do Brasil. Adultos foram convidados a construir os planos de ação e de enfrentamento de obstáculos baseados sobre a Teoria da Ativação da Intenção. Os planos foram analisados quantitativa e qualitativamente. Resultados: Os planos de ação incluíram três temas principais: (1) Associar a tomada dos antidiabéticos orais aos marcadores de tempo ou ao ciclo de sono / vigília; (2) em ambientes específicos; (3) associados às atividades de vida diária. Os planos de enfrentamento das barreiras percebidas centraram-se em colocar os comprimidos em locais visíveis, pedir ajuda aos familiares para evitar esquecimento, estabelecer rotina e alimentar-se adequadamente. Conclusões: A forma mais eficaz de manejar a tomada de antidiabéticos orais de modo satisfatório parece ser o reconhecimento das barreiras percebidas pela própria pessoa. A implementação de ações específicas e individualizadas bem como de planos de enfrentamento para superar as barreiras percebidas foi o diferencial neste estudo. (AU)
