Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Exp Gerontol ; 179: 112227, 2023 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37263367

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To investigate associations between body mass index (BMI), body fat percentage, and components of sarcopenia (muscle mass and muscle strength/power), with bone microarchitecture measured by high-resolution peripheral computed tomography (HR-pQCT) in older adults with obesity. METHODS: Seventy-four adults aged ≥ 55 years with body fat percentage ≥ 30 % (men) or ≥40 % (women) were included. Fat mass, lean mass and total hip, femoral neck, and lumbar spine areal bone mineral density (aBMD) were measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Appendicular lean mass (ALM) was calculated as the sum of lean mass in the upper- and lower-limbs. BMI was calculated and participants completed physical function assessments including stair climb power test. Distal tibial bone microarchitecture was assessed using HR-pQCT. Linear regression (ß-coefficients and 95 % confidence intervals) analyses were performed with adjustment for confounders including age, sex, smoking status, vitamin D and self-reported moderate to vigorous physical activity. RESULTS: BMI and ALM/height2 were both positively associated with total hip, femoral neck and lumbar spine aBMD and trabecular bone volume fraction after adjusting for confounders (all p < 0.05). Body fat percentage was not associated with aBMD or any trabecular bone parameters but was negatively associated with cortical area (p < 0.05). Stair climb power (indicating better performance) was positively associated with cortical area and negatively associated with bone failure load (both p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Higher BMI, ALM/height2 and muscle power were associated with more favourable bone microarchitecture, but higher body fat percentage was negatively associated with cortical bone area. These findings suggest that high BMI may be protective for fractures and that this might be attributable to higher muscle mass and/or forces, while higher relative body fat is not associated with better bone health in older adults with obesity.


Subject(s)
Bone Density , Sarcopenia , Male , Humans , Female , Aged , Bone Density/physiology , Body Mass Index , Sarcopenia/etiology , Sarcopenia/complications , Obesity/complications , Absorptiometry, Photon , Adipose Tissue/diagnostic imaging , Tomography
2.
BMC Geriatr ; 21(1): 276, 2021 04 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33902464

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The risk of progressive declines in skeletal muscle mass and strength, termed sarcopenia, increases with age, physical inactivity and poor diet. The purpose of this study was to explore and compare associations of sarcopenia components with self-reported physical activity and nutrition in older adults participating in resistance training at Helsinki University Research [HUR] and conventional gyms for over a year, once a week, on average. METHODS: The study looked at differences between HUR (n = 3) and conventional (n = 1) gyms. Muscle strength (via handgrip strength and chair stands), appendicular lean mass (ALM; via dual energy X-ray absorptiometry) and physical performance (via gait speed over a 4-m distance, short physical performance battery, timed up and go and 400-m walk tests) were evaluated in 80 community-dwelling older adults (mean ± SD 76.5 ± 6.5 years). Pearson correlations explored associations for sarcopenia components with self-reported physical activity (via Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly [PASE]) and nutrition (via Australian Eating Survey). RESULTS: No differences in PASE and the Australian Recommended Food Score (ARFS) were observed between HUR and conventional gyms, however HUR gym participants had a significantly higher self-reported protein intake (108 ± 39 g vs 88 ± 27 g; p = 0.029) and a trend to have higher energy intake (9698 ± 3006 kJ vs 8266 ± 2904 kJ; p = 0.055). In both gym groups, gait speed was positively associated with self-reported physical activity (r = 0.275; p = 0.039 and r = 0.423; p = 0.044 for HUR and conventional gyms, respectively). ALM was positively associated with protein (p = 0.047, r = 0.418) and energy (p = 0.038, r = 0.435) intake in the conventional gym group. Similar associations were observed for ALM/h2 in the HUR group. None of the sarcopenia components were associated with ARFS in either gym group. CONCLUSION: Older adults attending HUR and conventional gyms had similar self-reported function and nutrition (but not protein intake). Inadequate physical activity was associated with low gait speed and inadequate nutrition and low protein ingestion associated with low lean mas, even in older adults participating in exercise programs. Optimal physical activity and nutrition are important for maintaining muscle mass and function in older adults.


Subject(s)
Sarcopenia , Aged , Australia/epidemiology , Exercise , Hand Strength , Humans , Muscle Strength , Muscle, Skeletal , Sarcopenia/diagnosis , Sarcopenia/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...