ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the use, effectiveness and safety of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) for chronic myelogenous leukaemia (CML) in clinical practice. METHODS: A retrospective longitudinal study of patients with CML who received TKIs for at least 6 months was performed. Endpoints to evaluate effectiveness were haematological, cytogenetic and molecular responses. Safety was assessed according to the occurrence of adverse events. RESULTS: Sixty-two patients were included. All received imatinib as the initial TKI; 8% switched to nilotinib due to lack of major molecular response (MMR) to imatinib and 3% switched to dasatinib because of progression to blast crisis or lack of MMR. At the end of the study all patients had achieved at least a complete cytogenetic response. With regard to safety, in 11 patients the dose of imatinib was decreased and four patients switched to a second-generation TKI due to imatinib toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: Considering the good responses of most patients and its better known safety profile, imatinib should remain a good option for first-line treatment of CML.
Subject(s)
Hospitals, University/standards , Imatinib Mesylate/therapeutic use , Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive/diagnosis , Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive/drug therapy , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Imatinib Mesylate/adverse effects , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Middle Aged , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: This study evaluates the effectiveness, safety and costs of switching to a rilpivirine/emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (RPV/FTC/TDF) regimen in treatment-experienced HIV-1-infected patients with sustained virological suppression. METHODS: Observational, prospective study. Study population included all treatment-experienced patients with sustained virological suppression who switched to RPV/FTC/TDF during 2013 in a tertiary hospital. Patients were followed until they completed 96 weeks of treatment. The effectiveness end-point was defined as the proportion of patients who maintained virological suppression at week 96 by intention-to-treat analysis (discontinuation=failure). The safety of RPV/FTC/TDF (incidence of adverse events leading to discontinuation and laboratory abnormalities) and adherence to this regimen were evaluated, and the cost of switching was analysed. RESULTS: One-hundred forty-six patients were included. At week 96, 71.9% of patients remained virologically suppressed; 6.8% experienced virological failure. During follow-up, 25.3% of patients discontinued RPV/FTC/TDF (14.4% because of adverse events, mainly renal impairment). Throughout the 96 weeks, there were significant decreases in total cholesterol (TC) (14.0 mg/dL, P<.001), TC/HDL cholesterol ratio (0.4 mg/dL, P=.019) and triglycerides (42.0 mg/dL, P<.001). A slight decrease in glomerular filtration rate was observed (4.3 mL/min/1.73 m2 , P<.001). Switching to RPV/FTC/TDF improved adherence in the subgroup of patients whose previous treatment was based on a twice-daily schedule, although differences did not reach statistical significance. Switching to RPV/FTC/TDF reduced the annual per-patient antiretroviral cost by 1744 (P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: In virologically suppressed patients, the switch to a RPV/FTC/TDF regimen was associated with a mild but maintained improvement in lipid parameters and a significant reduction in costs. However, the relatively high rates of virological failure and treatment discontinuation because of adverse events make this combination a less favourable choice over other regimens currently available.
