Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Publication year range
1.
Int Angiol ; 40(4): 289-296, 2021 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34060282

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to analyze the appropriateness of the type of repair (open or endovascular) performed for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) in five university hospitals in Spain, according to evidence-based recommendations. METHODS: A multicenter, retrospective cross-sectional study of patients with AAA who underwent elective open surgical repair (OSR) or endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). Data were collected on demographic and clinical variables and type of surgical repair. A pair of vascular surgeons from each participating hospital performed a blinded assessment based on GRADE recommendations. The concordance between the two evaluators and the agreement between their evidence-based recommendation and the procedure performed were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 186 patients were selected; 179 were included. Mean age was 72.5 years (standard deviation [SD], 8.4), mean Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) was 2.04 (SD, 1.9). OSR was performed in 53.2% (N.=99) and EVAR in 46.8% (N.=87) of cases. Overall, 65.9% (118/179) of interventions performed were considered appropriate: 50% (47/94) of OSRs and 83.5% (71/85) of EVARs. The patient characteristics were similar for all the hospitals, but the chosen surgical technique did show significant differences among these centers. There were no significant differences among the hospitals in the proportion of cases judged as appropriate, either overall (P=0.346) or for each type of procedure (P=0.531 and P=0.538 for OSR and EVAR, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, most of the AAA repairs performed were appropriate according to GRADE recommendations. A higher proportion of EVARs were considered appropriate than OSRs. Choice of AAA repair should be standardized using evidence-based clinical practice guidelines, while incorporating patient preferences, to reduce the existing variability and ensure appropriate selection of AAA repair technique.


Subject(s)
Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation , Endovascular Procedures , Aged , Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/surgery , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects , Cross-Sectional Studies , Elective Surgical Procedures , Endovascular Procedures/adverse effects , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Spain , Tertiary Care Centers , Treatment Outcome
2.
Angiol. (Barcelona) ; 71(4): 167-169, jul.-ago. 2019. ilus
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-190301

ABSTRACT

Las variaciones anatómicas en la vascularización arterial renal son altamente prevalentes y su conocimiento es de especial interés clínico. Nuestro objetivo es describir una variante anatómica de las arterias renales poco conocida en la literatura actual


The anatomical variations in renal arterial vascularization are highly prevalent and their knowledge is of special clinical interest. Our aim is to describe an anatomical variant of the renal arteries little known in current literatura


Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Aged , Embolism/diagnostic imaging , Embolism/surgery , Renal Artery/abnormalities , Renal Artery/diagnostic imaging , Kidney Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Kidney Diseases/surgery
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...