Pregnancy and brain tumors; a systematic review of the literature.

The incidence of primary brain tumors during pregnancy is uncommon. The etiology of these can range from different genetic syndromes such as Li Fraumeni, neurofibromatosis type I, and hormonal associated tumors. The number of meningiomas gradually tends to increase during pregnancy, suggesting a relationship between non-malignant meningiomas and hormonal changes. Clinical features are non specific or can be misinterpreted with pregnancy symptoms such as headache, vomiting and dizziness. It is worth mentioning that the symptoms due to intracranial tumors are no different in pregnant compared with non pregnant patients. However, retrospective studies in glioma behavior suggested that both tumor volume and growth, increased during pregnancy. These changes were correlated with clinical worsening and increased frequency of seizures. The diagnosis requires a proper neurologic exploration and the support of imaging studies. Treatment of tumors is very controversial since we look for the preservation of both mother and fetus. In theory, the best therapy for the mother will also be the best therapy for the fetus. During pregnancy, ideally the treatment is symptomatic, to preserve the fetus, and definite treatment may be performed after birth; the latter is not always accomplished since patients may present with impending herniation or a malignant tumor for which immediate management is necessary. We intend to give an updated review in the literature on the adequate treatment of brain tumors during pregnancy and the anesthetic management during the definite treatment. Literature data was obtained from Pubmed using the search terms: "Pregnancy", "Brain", "Tumors". A total of forty-three articles were selected.

Comparison of the Purelyse® - IS6110 nested PCR with the Xpert® MTB/RIF test in clinical samples with suspected tuberculosis.

Tuberculosis (TB) has a high incidence, prevalence and mortality in the world. Due to its high level of transmission and long-term pharmacological treatment, it is important to have sensitive and specific diagnostic tests. Recently, the PureLyse® system, which is a novel DNA extraction method, was proposed to be an important tool for molecular diagnosis of TB. Here, we compare the PureLyse® system followed by an IS6110 nested PCR (PureLyse® - IS6110 nested PCR) with the Xpert® MTB/RIF test for Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC) identification in 40 clinical samples. Among the 40 samples, 26 samples were positive and 14 negative for the Xpert® MTB/RIF test as well as for the PureLyse® - IS6110 nested PCR. According to the Xpert® MTB/RIF test, positive samples presented different bacillary concentrations from "High" to "Very low" and rifampin resistance was observed in 5 samples. The concordance of both molecular methods makes the PureLyse® - IS6110 nested PCR suitable for MTBC detection in patients for low-income resources.