Transseptal puncture for left atrial ablation: Risk factors for cardiac tamponade and a proposed causative classification system.

AIMS: Cardiac tamponade is a high morbidity complication of transseptal puncture (TSP). We examined the associations of TSP-related cardiac tamponade (TRCT) for all patients undergoing left atrial ablation at our center from 2016 to 2020. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patient and procedural variables were extracted retrospectively. Cases of cardiac tamponade were scrutinized to adjudicate TSP culpability. Adjusted multivariate analysis examined predictors of TRCT. A total of 3239 consecutive TSPs were performed; cardiac tamponade occurred in 51 patients (incidence: 1.6%) and was adjudicated as TSP-related in 35 (incidence: 1.1%; 68.6% of all tamponades). Patients of above-median age [odds ratio (OR): 2.4 (1.19-4.2), p = .006] and those undergoing re-do procedures [OR: 1.95 (1.29-3.43, p = .042] were at higher risk of TRCT. Of the operator-dependent variables, choice of transseptal needle (Endrys vs. Brockenbrough, p > .1) or puncture sheath (Swartz vs. Mullins vs. Agilis vs. Vizigo vs. Cryosheath, all p > .1) did not predict TRCT. Adjusting for operator, equipment and demographics, failure to cross the septum first pass increased TRCT risk [OR: 4.42 (2.45-8.2), p = .001], whilst top quartile operator experience [OR: 0.4 (0.17-0.85), p = .002], transoesophageal echocardiogram [TOE prevalence: 26%, OR: 0.51 (0.11-0.94), p = .023], and use of the SafeSept transseptal guidewire [OR: 0.22 (0.08-0.62), p = .001] reduced TRCT risk. An increase in transseptal guidewire use over time (2016: 15.6%, 2020: 60.2%) correlated with an annual reduction in TRCT (R2 = 0.72, p < .001) and was associated with a relative risk reduction of 70%. CONCLUSIONS: During left atrial ablation, the risk of TRCT was reduced by operator experience, TOE-guidance, and use of a transseptal guidewire, and was increased by patient age, re-do procedures, and failure to cross the septum first pass.

Kolkata-Coventry comparative registry study of acute heart failure: an insight into the impact of public, private and universal health systems on patient outcomes in low-middle income cities (KOLCOV HF Study).

INTRODUCTION: Survival gaps in acute heart failure (AHF) continue to expand globally. Multinational heart failure (HF) registries have highlighted variations between countries. Whether discrepancies in HF practice and outcomes occur across different health systems (ie, private, public or universal healthcare) within a city or between countries remain unclear. Insight into organisational care is also scarce. With increasing public scrutiny of health inequalities, a study to address these limitations is timely. METHOD: KOLCOV-HF study prospectively compared patients with AHF in public (Nil Ratan Sircar Hospital (NRS)) versus private (Apollo Gleneagles Hospital (AGH)) hospitals of Kolkata, India, and one with universal health coverage in a socioeconomically comparable city of Coventry, England (University Hospitals Coventry & Warwickshire (UHCW)). Data variables were adapted from UK's National HF Audit programme, collected over 24 months. Predictors of in-hospital mortality and length of hospitalisation were assessed for each centre. RESULTS: Among 1652 patients, in-hospital mortality was highest in government-funded NRS (11.9%) while 3 miles north, AGH had significantly lower mortality (7.5%, p=0.034), similar to UHCW (8%). This could be attributed to distinct HF phenotypes and differences in clinical and organisational care. As expected, low blood pressure was associated with a significantly greater risk of death in patients served by public hospitals UHCW and NRS. CONCLUSION: Marked differences in HF characteristics, management and outcomes exist intra-regionally, and between low-middle versus high-income countries across private, public and universal healthcare systems. Physicians and policymakers should take caution when applying country-level data locally when developing strategies to address local evidence-practice gaps in HF.