The effect of housing condition on the performance of two types of activity meters to detect estrus in dairy cows.

When the daily routine of a cow is disturbed, it may have a detrimental effect on the performance of activity meters to detect estrus. It is possible that during the pasture period, the daily routine of cows is disturbed, adversely affecting the performance of activity meters to detect estrus which does not happen when the cows are housed indoors. The objective of this study was to investigate whether housing conditions (pasture or indoor) affected the performance of activity meters to detect estrus in dairy cows. In this research, two types of activity meters were used, an activity meter attached to the leg and one mounted on the neck. Cows of two different herds were equipped with the Smarttag Leg and the Smarttag Neck (Nedap livestock management, Groenlo, the Netherlands). The study began during the pasture period (September) and ended during the indoor period (January). The pasture period ended at the beginning of November. So, about two months of pasture period and two months of indoor period were studied. Milk samples were collected twice a week during the morning milking and true estrus was determined by milk progesterone concentrations. In total, the dataset consisted of 95 true estrous periods and 1992 true non-estrous days of 56 cows for the pasture period and 138 true estrous periods and 3164 true non-estrous days of 65 cows for the indoor period. Overall, no differences in sensitivity, positive predictive value (PPV) and specificity were found between the pasture and indoor period for both types of sensors. There was also no difference in the performance between leg and neck activity meters. Sensitivity was between 76 and 82%, PPV was between 87 and 92% and specificity was between 99 and 100%. In conclusion, the sensitivity, PPV and specificity did not differ between the pasture and indoor period. This means that, in our study, the performance of both types of activity meters to detect estrus is not affected by housing conditions.

The effect of fenceline bull exposure on expression of oestrus in dairy cows.

The objective of this study was to investigate whether dairy cows visit and interact with a fenceline-housed bull more during oestrus than outside oestrus and whether fenceline bull contact affects expression of oestrus. At one end of a free stall a fence with vertical open bars was placed behind which a bull could be housed, allowing interactions with the cows. A closed fence with two blinded entrances was placed before the fence, creating a contact area. The experiment consisted of three treatments; it started with the control treatment (no bull on the farm) and was followed by bull treatment (a bull housed behind the fence) and no bull treatment (a bull present on the farm but not housed behind the fence). Signs of oestrus were observed every 4h for 30min and cows were equipped with pedometers. On the day of oestrus, cows were more frequent in the contact area during the bull treatment (12.0+/-9.8 times) and the no bull treatment (13.9+/-10.2 times) than during the control treatment (2.6+/-2.5 times). The frequency of visits to the contact area was low and not different between treatments on the other days (2.2+/-1.9 times). More cows had direct contact with the bull on the day of oestrus (71.4%) compared to the days outside oestrus (21.4-30%). The duration of direct contact with the bull was highly variable between cows and did not differ between oestrus and non-oestrus days. Behaviour and duration of oestrus were not affected by treatment but the relative increase in number of steps during oestrus tended to be higher in the bull (5.5+/-0.2) and no bull treatment (5.3+/-0.3) than in the control treatment (4.6+/-0.3). In conclusion, dairy cows in oestrus seem to be attracted by a bull or by the expectation of the presence of a bull, but fenceline bull exposure does not affect behavioural expression of oestrus.

The acute effect of bull presence on plasma profiles of luteinizing hormone in postpartum, anoestrous dairy cows.

The objective of this study was to investigate whether bull exposure affects LH profiles in postpartum, anoestrous dairy cows. Eight cows between 10 and 17 days after parturition were used. On Day 1, blood samples were taken at 10 min intervals for 8 h. On Day 2, blood sampling continued at 10 min intervals and after 2 h a bull was introduced behind a fence, and blood sampling continued for another 8 h. Time of resumption of luteal activity was between 25 and more than 80 days after parturition for these animals and was not related (P>0.1) with frequency of LH pulses, amplitude of pulses and basal LH concentration on either Day 1 or Day 2. In 6 of the 8 cows, average and basal LH concentration were greater (P<0.001) during the 8 h of bull presence (0.56 +/- 0.33 and 0.39 +/- 0.26 ng/ml, respectively) compared to the 8 h without a bull (0.50 +/- 0.30 and 0.35 +/- 0.24 ng/ml, respectively). Pulse amplitude did not differ (P=0.85) between Day 2 (0.45 +/- 0.24 ng/ml) or Day 1 (0.45 +/- 0.14 ng/ml). LH pulse frequency was greater (P<0.1) on Day 2 (5.3 pulses/8h) compared to the Day 1 (4.6 pulses/8h). In conclusion, fenceline bull exposure early postpartum seems to have an acute effect on LH-release in anoestrous dairy cows. Whether sustained bull exposure can hasten first ovulation after calving through an effect on LH release in dairy cows is an interesting area of research.

Effect of repeated stress treatments during the follicular phase and early pregnancy on reproductive performance of gilts.

In pig husbandry, stress is being considered an important cause of impaired reproductive performance. Therefore, an experiment was performed to quantify effects of repeated stressors during the follicular phase and/or during early pregnancy on reproductive performance of gilts. Eighty-one cyclic gilts were assigned to one of four treatments, namely, stress treatment during the follicular phase (n = 20), stress treatment during early pregnancy (n = 20), stress treatment during both phases (n = 21) and no stress treatment (n = 20). All gilts were housed individually, but gilts in the stress treatments had no opportunity for visual or physical contact with other gilts. Further, animals in a stress-treatment were grouped for half an hour at the start of the treatment and during the treatment period nose-sling and an unpredictable feeding scheme were applied regularly. The extent of stress was monitored using heart rate measurements, behavioural observations and saliva cortisol levels during nose-sling fixation. Of the 81 gilts, 93% showed oestrus and were inseminated. Of these, 93% were pregnant at day 35, having 17.9 +/- 0.3 ovulations and 15.6 +/- 0.3 foetuses. These parameters were not affected by treatment. The stress treatment during the follicular phase tended to shorten cycle length (stress: 20.8 +/- 0.20; control: 21.2 +/- 0.17 days, p = 0.07) and weight of foetuses at day 35 (stress: 4.47 +/- 0.08 g; no stress: 4.69 +/- 0.08 g, p = 0.06); stress during early pregnancy did not affect any of the reproduction parameters. Percentage stereotypic behaviour, heart rate and saliva cortisol levels varied greatly between animals and between days, but did not differ between the treatments. No relationships were found between any of the reproductive parameters and any of the stress parameters (heart rate, cortisol, stereotypic behaviour). These results indicate that the repeatedly applied acute stressors did not generate a chronic stress-response and that these stressors during the follicular phase and/or during early pregnancy did not affect reproductive processes. It is not clear how these findings relate to suggested effects of stress(ors) on reproductive performance in pig husbandry.

Effects of insemination-ovulation interval on fertilization rates and embryo characteristics in dairy cattle.

The objective of this study was to examine effects of the interval between insemination and ovulation on fertilization and embryo characteristics (quality scored as good, fair, poor and degenerate; morphology; number of cell cycles and accessory sperm number) in dairy cattle. Time of ovulation was assessed by ultrasonography (every 4h). Cows were artificially inseminated once between 36h before ovulation and 12h after ovulation. In total 122 oocytes/embryos were recovered 7d after ovulation. Insemination-ovulation interval (12h-intervals) affected fertilization and the percentages of good embryos. Fertilization rates were higher when AI was performed between 36-24 and 24-12h before ovulation (85% and 82%) compared to AI after ovulation (56%). AI between 24 and 12h before ovulation resulted in higher percentages of good embryos (68%) compared to AI after ovulation (6%). Insemination-ovulation interval had no effect on number of accessory sperm cells and number of cell cycles when corrected for embryo quality. This study showed that the insemination-ovulation interval with a high probability of fertilization is quite long (from 36 to 12h before ovulation). However, the insemination-ovulation interval in which this fertilized oocyte has a high probability of developing into a good embryo is shorter (24-12h before ovulation).

Relationship of plasma nonesterified fatty acids and walking activity in postpartum dairy cows.

To survive and produce milk, postpartum dairy cows use their reserves through lipolysis. If the negative energy balance is severe, nonesterified fatty acids (NEFA) are formed that can impair several physiological processes. A pilot study suggested that increased walking activity after calving may be related to a reduced serum concentration of NEFA. The objective of this study was to determine the relationship between plasma concentrations of NEFA and walking activity in dairy cattle during the postpartum period. Data were collected from 33 multiparous Holstein-Friesian dairy cows. Walking activities were quantified using pedometry, and blood samples were collected for determination of NEFA. Results of this study indicated that a negative relationship existed between walking activity and plasma NEFA concentrations in postpartum dairy cows.

Relationship between progesterone concentrations in milk and blood and time of ovulation in dairy cattle.

The objective of this study was to investigate whether monitoring progesterone concentrations in milk and blood plasma can be used to predict time of ovulation in dairy cattle. Whole milk was sampled twice daily and blood samples were collected once a day before the morning milking. Ovulation was assessed by trans-rectal ultrasonography at 4h intervals beginning from the end of estrus. For a parameter to be useful as predictor for time of ovulation, it should be precise (i.e. variation between animals should not exceed 12h). In milk, progesterone concentration dropped <15 ng/ml at 97.7+/-17.8h (range: 54-126 h) before ovulation, to <5 ng/ml at 79.7+/-11.2h (range: 54-98) before ovulation to decline further to <2n g/ml at 70.7+/-16.8h (range: 38-90 h) before ovulation (n=20). In plasma, progesterone concentration dropped to <4ng/ml 90.5+/-19.6h (range: 66-138 h) before ovulation and to <2 ng/ml at 75.0+/-12.2 h (range: 50-98) before ovulation. These intervals were not influenced by parity, milk production or days in milk. In conclusion, monitoring of progesterone alone is not sufficient to predict ovulation because of the large variation in timing of decrease of progesterone concentrations relative to ovulation between animals. At best the range is about 2 days.

Effect of time of artificial insemination on embryo sex ratio in dairy cattle.

The objective of the present study was to examine whether different intervals between insemination and ovulation have an influence on the sex of seven-day-old embryos in dairy cattle. Cows were inseminated once with semen of one of two bulls of proven fertility between 36 h before ovulation and 12 h after ovulation. Time of ovulation was assessed by ultrasound at 4-h intervals. In total, 64 embryos were determined to be male or female. Of these 64 embryos, 51.6% were female. The sex ratio in the various insemination-ovulation intervals (early: between 36 and 20 h before ovulation; intermediate: between 20 and 8 h before ovulation; late: between 8 h before and 12 h after ovulation) did not significantly differ from the expected 1:1 sex ratio (50, 50 and 55% females, respectively). Bull (Bull A and B) and Parity (primiparous and multiparous) had no influence on the expected 1:1 sex ratio either. The number of cell cycles was similar for male and female (P = 0.23) embryos when quality of the embryo (P < 0.0001) was included in the model. The results of this study indicate that, in cattle, the interval between insemination and ovulation does not influence the sex ratio of seven-day-old embryos.

Various behavioral signs of estrous and their relationship with time of ovulation in dairy cattle.

The objective of this study was to investigate the relationship between various behavioral signs of estrous and time of ovulation and, determine which behavioral estrous sign(s) best predicted time of ovulation. In total, 94 ovulations were observed in 67 Holstein-Friesian dairy cows. Different behavioral estrous signs were observed at 3-h intervals and their relation with time of ovulation (ultrasound examinations at 3-h intervals) was investigated. In all estrous periods, sniffing and chin resting was displayed, while mounting was displayed in 90% and standing heat in 58% of estrous periods. Estrus was more intense in primiparous cows compared to multiparous cows and when more animals were in estrus at the same time. Although, these factors influenced intensity of estrous behavioral signs, they did not influence time of ovulation. Ovulation occurred 30.0 +/- 5.1 h after onset of estrus (ranging between 18.5 and 48.5 h) and 18.8 +/- 4.4 h after end of estrus (ranging between 9.5 and 33.5 h). Although informative, these predictors are highly variable between individuals and the method used to determine the onset and end of estrus is time consuming this, therefore limits in their use as a practical predictor of ovulation. Sniffing and chin resting were displayed during the non-estrous period and are therefore, not useful predictors of ovulation time. For animals that displayed standing heat, onset of standing heat was a good predictor for ovulation time (occurring 26.4 +/- 5.2 h before ovulation). However, standing heat was only displayed in a limited number of cows, especially when only one cow was in estrus at a time. Onset of mounting was the best predictor for time of ovulation (occurring 28.7 +/- 5.3 h before ovulation), and it was displayed in 90% of the estrous periods. However, mounting cannot yet be assessed automatically, which limits its practical use as ovulation predictor.