CD33+ CD14- phenotype is characteristic of multinuclear osteoclast-like cells in giant cell tumor of bone.

Giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) is a benign bone tumor with a shown clinical behavior of local recurrences and rare distant metastases. GCTB is composed of uniformly distributed osteoclastic giant cells, thought to originate from the fusion of monocyte-macrophage lineage cells, in a background consisting of mononuclear rounded cells and spindle-shaped cells. Several reports showed the specific expression of markers, such as CD14 on the mononuclear rounded cell population, however, lacking osteoclastic giant cells. Blood monocytes that were CD14+, CD33+, or CD14+/CD33+ have also been shown to be programmed as pre-osteoclasts. The macrophage marker CD33 is expressed earlier than CD14 in macrophage maturation, whereas CD14 is expressed longer than CD33. The aim of this study was to investigate CD14/CD33 expression profiles in GCTB. Nineteen GCTB tumor samples of 19 patients were studied. Immunofluorescent analyses were performed with monoclonal antibodies against CD14, CD33, RANK, and CD51. To unambiguously further prove the expression of these molecules, quantitative RT-PCR was used with subsequent sequencing of its products. All samples showed similar immunoreactivity profiles. The mononuclear rounded cell population was positive for RANK, CD51, CD14, and CD33. The osteoclastic giant cell population expressed RANK and CD51, as well as CD33, but was consistently negative for CD14 expression. The CD14 and CD33 profiles were confirmed by quantitative RT-PCR. These RT-PCR products were sequence verified. Osteoclasts in GCTB are the result of fusion of CD33-expressing pre-osteoclasts that further fuse with CD14+ mononuclear cells. Although these results reflect a static rather than a dynamic spectrum, we strongly believe that osteoclastogenesis seems not to be the exclusive result of fusion of intratumoral CD14+ mononuclear cells. Moreover, CD33-modulated osteoclastogenesis opens up the possibility for novel therapeutic directions.

Dedifferentiated adamantinoma with revertant mesenchymal phenotype.

In adamantinoma of long bones, an osteofibrous dysplasia-like form with scattered epithelial elements and a classic form with abundant epithelium are distinguished. Osteofibrous dysplasia-like adamantinomas occur in children and adolescents and behave relatively benign, whereas classic adamantinomas predominate in adults and have a more aggressive clinical course. Because some osteofibrous dysplasia-like tumors have progressed to classic adamantinomas, it is hypothesized that the former is a potential precursor of the latter, showing mesenchymal-to-epithelial transformation. We report a new morphologic variant of adamantinoma in three patients with sarcomatoid transformation of the epithelial component: one in a primary tumor and two in local recurrences. One patient died of metastatic disease. Histologically, the tumors showed loss of the original characteristic epithelial differentiation with transition to fields of highly pleomorphic cells without epithelial features, high mitotic count, and deposition of osteoid and chondroid matrix. These dedifferentiated areas showed pankeratin positivity as well, although there were some changes in keratin subclass profile compared with other classic adamantinomas. This peculiar variant of long bone adamantinoma shows that in addition to mesenchymal-to-epithelial transformation in the early stage of development, progression to an aggressive subtype may be associated with epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition ("sarcomatoid dedifferentiation"), in which the epithelial immunophenotype is conserved. Thereby it may serve as an example of the plasticity of the mesenchymal phenotype. When confronted with a biopsy of a cortical tumor of the tibia showing sarcomatoid morphology and keratin positivity, adamantinoma should be included in the differential diagnosis, as its distinction has important implications for treatment and prognosis.

Norbert Goormaghtigh and his contribution to the histophysiology of the kidney.

Norbert Goormaghtigh was born in Ostend on February 14, 1890 and died in Sint-Martens-Latem (Belgium) on January 2, 1960. He was chief of pathology in Ghent from 1923 and became well known for his studies on the structure of the adrenal gland. He started his studies on the kidney and its juxtaglomerular apparatus at the beginning of the thirties carrying on from previous observations made by Ruiter, Borst and Zimmerman, and in 1932 he provided evidence of its endocrine function. Seminal confirming papers appeared in 1939, 1940.