Novel Nanofluidic IgE Assay versus a Reference Method: A Real-World Comparison.

BACKGROUND: Clinically meaningful specific IgE determination is an important step in the diagnosis of allergic diseases. While patient's history and skin prick tests are available during the medical visit, most IgE immunoassays require hours to several days to be available. Recent developments in the field of nanofluidic technology open new horizons for point-of-care management of this unmet medical need. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare IgE diagnostic agreement between a nanofluidic assay (abioSCOPE®) and a laboratory reference method (Phadia Laboratory System®) in a real-world clinical setting. METHODS: Sera from 105 patients whose routine allergy diagnostic workup required a blood sampling were used to compare the novel nanofluidic IgE assay to a reference method in a blind manner for a panel of five respiratory allergens. To assess the agreement between methods, patient records were reviewed by four independent experts to establish the final diagnosis. Experts were blinded to the IgE serological method used, but had access to patient history, skin prick tests, and blood test results. RESULTS: Analytic agreement between the two methods was 81% for the tested panel of allergens (ranging from 77 to 89%). The overall agreement in clinical diagnosis decision taken by the expert panel was 94.6% with the nanofluidic IgE assay when compared to the reference method. CONCLUSION: The nanofluidic IgE assay, as determined through an evaluation based on clinical history, skin prick tests, and IgE measurement, is a valuable tool for allergy experts to identify patients' sensitization patterns at the point of care, and for routine IgE diagnostic workup.

Safety of biological agents in paediatric rheumatic diseases: A real-life multicenter retrospective study using the JIRcohorte database.

OBJECTIVE: To analyse and report the incidence of side effects of biological agents in paediatric patients with inflammatory diseases using of real-life follow-up cohort. METHODS: In this international, observational, retrospective, multicentre study of children treated by biological agents and followed in the Juvenile Inflammatory Rheumatism (JIR) cohort (JIRcohorte) network, a Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the occurrence of adverse events. A Cox model was constructed to identify independent predictors of adverse events. RESULTS: Overall 813 patients totalling 3439 patients-year (PY) of biological agents were included. The main diagnosis was juvenile idiopathic arthritis (84%). A total of 222 patients (27.3%) had 419 adverse events, representing an incidence rate of 12.2 per 100 PY 95% CI [11.0; 13.4]. The overall incidence rate of serious adverse events was 3.9 per 100 PY 95% CI [3.2; 4.6]. Tocilizumab and infliximab were significantly associated with adverse events and canakinumab with serious adverse events. Univariate and multivariable analysis of adverse events and serious adverse events indicated that patients under biological agents with concomitant immunosuppressive drugs (excluding methotrexate) suffered from more of these events. CONCLUSION: This study suggests an overall an acceptable safety of biologic agents in children with inflammatory rheumatic diseases treated with biological agents. However, the concomitant prescription of immunosuppressive drugs with biological agents represents a substantial risk of adverse events.

The Candidate Blood-stage Malaria Vaccine P27A Induces a Robust Humoral Response in a Fast Track to the Field Phase 1 Trial in Exposed and Nonexposed Volunteers.

Background: P27A is an unstructured 104mer synthetic peptide from Plasmodium falciparum trophozoite exported protein 1 (TEX1), the target of human antibodies inhibiting parasite growth. The present project aimed at evaluating the safety and immunogenicity of P27A peptide vaccine in malaria-nonexposed European and malaria-exposed African adults. Methods: This study was designed as a staggered, fast-track, randomized, antigen and adjuvant dose-finding, multicenter phase 1a/1b trial, conducted in Switzerland and Tanzania. P27A antigen (10 or 50 µg), adjuvanted with Alhydrogel or glucopyranosil lipid adjuvant stable emulsion (GLA-SE; 2.5 or 5 µg), or control rabies vaccine (Verorab) were administered intramuscularly to 16 malaria-nonexposed and 40 malaria-exposed subjects on days 0, 28, and 56. Local and systemic adverse events (AEs) as well as humoral and cellular immune responses were assessed after each injection and during the 34-week follow-up. Results: Most AEs were mild to moderate and resolved completely within 48 hours. Systemic AEs were more frequent in the formulation with alum as compared to GLA-SE, whereas local AEs were more frequent after GLA-SE. No serious AEs occurred. Supported by a mixed Th1/Th2 cell-mediated immunity, P27A induced a marked specific antibody response able to recognize TEX1 in infected erythrocytes and to inhibit parasite growth through an antibody-dependent cellular inhibition mechanism. Incidence of AEs and antibody responses were significantly lower in malaria-exposed Tanzanian subjects than in nonexposed European subjects. Conclusions: The candidate vaccine P27A was safe and induced a particularly robust immunogenic response in combination with GLA-SE. This formulation should be considered for future efficacy trials. Clinical Trials Registration: NCT01949909, PACTR201310000683408.

[Food allergy in children: a diagnostic challenge]. / Allergies alimentaires de l'enfant: un défi diagnostique.

Food allergy in children has increased unexpectedly during the last decades and is now the leading cause of anaphylaxis in Europe. The impact on quality of life is significant; a reliable diagnosis is therefore of critical importance. The diagnostic approach includes an initial clinical evaluation followed by allergy testing (in vivo and/or in vitro). Determination of molecular allergens (recombinants) has emerged as a complementary tool in the diagnosis of food allergy allowing a better prediction of systemic reactions and identifying markers of persistence or resolution. With recent developments, a more proactive approach is being adopted, which includes oral food challenges in order to avoid unnecessary exclusions.