Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Appl Behav Anal ; 53(3): 1638-1659, 2020 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32166743

ABSTRACT

A competing stimulus assessment (CSA) is commonly used to identify leisure items for use in treatments designed to decrease automatically reinforced problem behavior. However, this type of assessment may not yield useful information if participants do not readily engage with leisure items. The purpose of this study was to evaluate a modified CSA that included additional treatment components (i.e., prompting, prompting plus differential reinforcement of alternative behavior). The modified CSA identified the treatment components and leisure items that were most effective for increasing leisure-item engagement and decreasing problem behavior for each participant. Modified CSA outcomes maintained during an extended treatment analysis in a natural setting and when intervention components were faded.


Subject(s)
Behavior Therapy , Problem Behavior , Reinforcement, Psychology , Adolescent , Autism Spectrum Disorder/psychology , Autism Spectrum Disorder/therapy , Child , Female , Humans , Male , Rett Syndrome/psychology , Rett Syndrome/therapy
2.
J Appl Behav Anal ; 53(3): 1514-1530, 2020 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32034774

ABSTRACT

The purpose of the current study was to evaluate the effects of different magnitudes of escape for compliance relative to the magnitudes of escape for problem behavior in a concurrent-schedule arrangement. Three individuals who exhibited escape-maintained problem behavior participated. A large differential magnitude condition (240-s escape for compliance, 10-s escape for problem behavior) was compared to equal (30-s escape for compliance and problem behavior) and moderate differential magnitude (90-s escape for compliance, 10-s escape for problem behavior) conditions. The authors also evaluated the impact of correcting for reinforcer access time (i.e., time on escape intervals) on intervention interpretation. For all participants, problem behavior decreased during only the large differential magnitude condition, and including reinforcer access time in the overall session time did not affect interpretation of treatment outcomes. Providing larger escape magnitudes for compliance relative to problem behavior may facilitate treatment involving concurrent-reinforcement schedules for escape-maintained problem behavior.


Subject(s)
Problem Behavior/psychology , Reinforcement, Psychology , Adolescent , Autism Spectrum Disorder/psychology , Autism Spectrum Disorder/therapy , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Male , Reinforcement Schedule , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...