ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Allergen immunotherapy clinics (AITCs) in Spain differ widely in terms of structure, organization, resources, and portfolio of services. Therefore, it is essential to unify treatment criteria and define quality standards for the most complex AITCs. Objective: To establish a series of recommendations that make it possible to guarantee quality and safety in the administration of immunotherapy and define quality standards for the most complex AITCs. METHODS: This project began with an online survey of 65 allergy departments/units throughout Spain in 2013. Next, a 2-phase consensus process was carried out. In the first phase, 10 experts defined and agreed on the standards using the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness method; in the second, the agreements were validated by means of a 2-round Delphi consultation with 84 experts. RESULTS: Consensus was reached on minimum safety and quality criteria in the administration of allergen immunotherapy, and 2 levels of highly complex AITCs were defined: accredited AITCs and accredited AITCs with excellence. Consensus was also reached on quality standards and accreditation criteria for both levels. CONCLUSIONS: This project is pioneering in terms of its purpose (the definition of quality standards for AITCs) and of the use of structured participation techniques (combination of the RAND/UCLA and Delphi methods). It enabled the design of minimum standards for quality and safety in administering AIT, as well as quality criteria for accreditation of AITCs supported by a broad panel of experts from the Spanish Society of Allergology and Clinical Immunology.
Subject(s)
Desensitization, Immunologic , Hypersensitivity/epidemiology , Hypersensitivity/therapy , Quality of Health Care , Consensus , Desensitization, Immunologic/methods , Desensitization, Immunologic/standards , Expert Testimony , Humans , Hypersensitivity/immunology , Internet , Public Health Surveillance , Quality Indicators, Health Care , Referral and Consultation , Spain/epidemiology , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Allergen immunotherapy clinics (AITCs) in Spain differ widely in terms of structure, organization, resources, and portfolio of services. Therefore, it is essential to unify treatment criteria and define quality standards for the most complex AITCs. OBJECTIVE: To establish a series of recommendations that make it possible to guarantee quality and safety in the administration of immunotherapy and define quality standards for the most complex AITCs. METHODS: This project began with an online survey of 65 allergy departments/units throughout Spain in 2013. Next, a 2-phase consensus process was carried out. In the first phase, 10 experts defined and agreed on the standards using the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness method; in the second, the agreements were validated by means of a 2-round Delphi consultation with 84 experts. RESULTS: Consensus was reached on minimum safety and quality criteria in the administration of allergen immunotherapy, and 2 levels of highly complex AITCs were defined: accredited AITCs and accredited AITCs with excellence. Consensus was also reached on quality standards and accreditation criteria for both levels. CONCLUSIONS: This project is pioneering in terms of its purpose (the definition of quality standards for AITCs) and of the use of structured participation techniques (combination of the RAND/UCLA and Delphi methods). It enabled the design of minimum standards for quality and safety in administering AIT, as well as quality criteria for accreditation of AITCs supported by a broad panel of experts from the Spanish Society of Allergology and Clinical Immunology
ANTECEDENTES: Las unidades de inmunoterapia (UIT) en España son muy diferentes en cuanto a estructura, organización, recursos y cartera de servicios. Por ello, resulta esencial homogeneizar criterios de actuación y definir estándares de calidad para las UIT de mayor complejidad. OBJETIVO: Establecer recomendaciones que permitan garantizar la calidad y seguridad en la administración de la inmunoterapia y definir estándares de calidad para las UIT de mayor complejidad. MÉTODOS: Proyecto iniciado (año 2013) con una encuesta on-line a 65 servicios o unidades de alergología de toda España. Posteriormente, se desarrolló un proceso de consenso en dos fases. En la primera, diez expertos definieron y consensuaron los estándares mediante el método RAND/UCLA; en la segunda, los acuerdos se validaron mediante una consulta Delphi a dos rondas con 84 expertos. RESULTADOS: Se consensuaron criterios mínimos de seguridad y calidad en la administración de inmunoterapia con alérgenos (ITA) y se definieron dos niveles de UIT de mayor complejidad: las UIT acreditadas (UITA) y las UIT acreditadas con excelencia (UITAE), consensuándose también los estándares de calidad y criterios de acreditación para ambos niveles. CONCLUSIONES: Proyecto pionero en su objetivo - definición de estándares de calidad de UIT- y en el empleo de técnicas de participación estructuradas -combinación de los métodos RAND/UCLA y Delphi-. El resultado es la definición de unos mínimos de calidad y seguridad para administrar ITA, y un conjunto de criterios de calidad para la acreditación de las UIT que cuenta con el respaldo de un amplio panel de expertos de la SEAIC
Subject(s)
Humans , Desensitization, Immunologic , Hypersensitivity/epidemiology , Hypersensitivity/therapy , Quality of Health Care , Consensus , Desensitization, Immunologic/methods , Desensitization, Immunologic/standards , Expert Testimony , Hypersensitivity/immunology , Internet , Public Health Surveillance , Quality Indicators, Health Care , Referral and Consultation , Spain/epidemiology , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
SUMMARY: The efficacy and safety of subcutaneous immunotherapy with modified, high-dose, major allergen house dust mite extract is widely supported by double-blind, placebo-controlled studies. However, little is known regarding patient-perceived efficacy and satisfaction. An observational, retrospective, multicentre study in patients treated with Acaroid® was conducted to assess the efficacy and degree of satisfaction of the patients after the first six months of treatment with it. All the clinical study procedures were performed according to the routine clinical practice. This study demonstrates that Acaroid® is effective and well tolerated. The patients' condition demonstrated a clear and marked improvement in the first 6 months after treatment initiation. Patients treated with Acaroid® were very satisfied, with a correlation to improvement in patient-perceived symptoms and the administration of treatment by a healthcare professional.
Subject(s)
Patient Satisfaction , Pyroglyphidae/immunology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Animals , Child , Child, Preschool , Desensitization, Immunologic/methods , Humans , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Surveys and QuestionnairesSubject(s)
Inhalation Exposure/adverse effects , Pollen/immunology , Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal/epidemiology , Trees/immunology , Urban Health , Adult , Female , Humans , Intradermal Tests , Male , Middle Aged , Predictive Value of Tests , Prevalence , Prospective Studies , Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal/diagnosis , Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal/immunology , Spain/epidemiologyABSTRACT
No disponible
