Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Med Philos ; 42(2): 184-198, 2017 Apr 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28186529

ABSTRACT

Recent controversy surrounding the Surfactant Positive Airway Pressure and Pulse Oximetry Trial (SUPPORT) and the Office for Human Resource Protection's (OHRP) judgment that its informed consent procedures were inadequate has unmasked considerable confusion about OHRP's definition of research risks. The controversy concerns application of that definition to trials comparing multiple treatments within the existing standard of care. Some have argued that it is impossible for such trials to pose research risks on the grounds that all risks associated with a standard-of-care treatment should instead be considered risks of treatment. However, analysis of OHRP's definition demonstrates that some risks in such trials can be research risks.


Subject(s)
Blindness/prevention & control , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Risk , Standard of Care , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Infant, Premature , Multicenter Studies as Topic , Oxygen/administration & dosage , Parental Consent , Research
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...