Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 77
Filter
1.
Front Med (Lausanne) ; 11: 1381031, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38938383

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Sarcoidosis is a multi-system inflammatory disease of unknown origin with heterogeneous clinical manifestations varying from a single organ non-caseating granuloma site to chronic systemic inflammation and fibrosis. Gene expression studies have suggested several genes and pathways implicated in the pathogenesis of sarcoidosis, however, due to differences in study design and variable statistical approaches, results were frequently not reproducible or concordant. Therefore, meta-analysis of sarcoidosis gene-expression datasets is of great importance to robustly establish differentially expressed genes and signalling pathways. Methods: We performed meta-analysis on 22 published gene-expression studies on sarcoidosis. Datasets were analysed systematically using same statistical cut-offs. Differentially expressed genes were identified by pooling of p-values using Edgington's method and analysed for pathways using Ingenuity Pathway Analysis software. Results: A consistent and significant signature of novel and well-known genes was identified, those collectively implicated both type I and type II interferon mediated signalling pathways in sarcoidosis. In silico functional analysis showed consistent downregulation of eukaryotic initiation factor 2 signalling, whereas cytokines like interferons and transcription factor STAT1 were upregulated. Furthermore, we analysed affected tissues to detect differentially expressed genes likely to be involved in granuloma biology. This revealed that matrix metallopeptidase 12 was exclusively upregulated in affected tissues, suggesting a crucial role in disease pathogenesis. Discussion: Our analysis provides a concise gene signature in sarcoidosis and expands our knowledge about the pathogenesis. Our results are of importance to improve current diagnostic approaches and monitoring strategies as well as in the development of targeted therapeutics.

2.
BMJ Open ; 13(6): e072689, 2023 06 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37369408

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Cochlear implantation (CI) is a (cost-)effective intervention for people with severe or profound hearing loss. Since its introduction experience increased and the technology evolved, leading to better results and relaxation of CI eligibility criteria. Meanwhile, with national healthcare costs increasing there is a need for evidence of healthcare technology's value. This protocol describes a study to investigate clinical and participatory outcomes after CI for the currently (expanded) eligible hearing impaired population. The study adds to the current evidence base through its multicentre design, long-term follow-up and use of participatory outcomes alongside standard clinical outcomes. METHODS: This multicentre prospective observational cohort study will include at least 156 adult patients with severe-to-profound hearing loss, approximately evenly divided into two groups (1, ages 18-65 years and 2, age >65 years). The measurements consist of audiometry, cognition tests, listening effort tests and multiple generic and disease specific questionnaires. Questionnaires will be administered twice before CI, soon after inclusion at CI referral and shortly before CI surgery, with an annual follow-up of 3 years after CI. The Impact on Participation and Autonomy questionnaire will be used to assess participation. Generalised models (linear, logistic, Poisson) will be used. Mixed effects models will be used to investigate changes over time while exploring differences in subgroups and the influence of covariates. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has received ethical approval from the Medical Ethical Committee of all participating centres. The results could provide valuable insights into changes in participatory outcomes of people with severe-to-profound hearing loss after CI. Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals, scientific conferences and professional and patient organisation meetings. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05525221.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation , Deafness , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural , Hearing Loss , Adult , Aged , Humans , Hearing Loss/surgery , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/surgery , Multicenter Studies as Topic , Observational Studies as Topic , Prospective Studies , Quality of Life , Adolescent , Young Adult , Middle Aged
3.
J Affect Disord ; 335: 410-417, 2023 08 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37178825

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT) is an evidence-based treatment for depression. The current study focused on the long-term outcomes of MBCT for chronically, treatment-resistant depressed patients during a 6-months follow-up period. Additionally, predictors of treatment outcomes were explored. METHOD: The outcomes of MBCT on depressive symptoms, remission rates, quality of life, rumination, mindfulness skills and self-compassion were investigated in a cohort of chronically, treatment-resistant depressed outpatients (N = 106), who had taken part in an RCT comparing MBCT with treatment-as-usual (TAU). Measures were assessed pre-MBCT, post-MBCT, at 3-months follow-up, and at 6-months follow-up. RESULTS: Results of linear mixed effect models and Bayesian repeated measures ANOVA's reveal that depressive symptoms, quality of life, rumination, mindfulness skills and self-compassion consolidated during follow-up. Remission rates even further increased over the course of follow-up. When controlling for symptoms at baseline, higher baseline levels of rumination predicted lower depressive symptoms and quality of life at 6-month follow-up. No other predictors (i.e. duration of current depressive episode, level of treatment-resistance, childhood trauma, mindfulness skills, self-compassion) were found. LIMITATIONS: All participants received MBCT, therefore time or other non-specific effects might have influenced the results and replication studies including a control conditions are needed. CONCLUSIONS: Results indicate that the clinical benefits of MBCT for chronically, treatment-resistant depressed patients persist up to 6 months after completing MBCT. Duration of the current episode, level of treatment-resistance, childhood trauma and baseline levels of mindfulness skills and self-compassion did not predict treatment outcome. When controlling for baseline depressive symptoms participants with high levels of rumination seem to benefit more; however more research is needed. TRIAL REGISTRY: Dutch Trial Registry, number NTR4843.


Subject(s)
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy , Mindfulness , Humans , Mindfulness/methods , Depression/psychology , Follow-Up Studies , Quality of Life/psychology , Bayes Theorem , Cognitive Behavioral Therapy/methods , Treatment Outcome
5.
Front Cardiovasc Med ; 9: 979819, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36277757

ABSTRACT

Objective: Dual pathway inhibition (DPI) by combining acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) with low-dose rivaroxaban has been shown to reduce cardiovascular events in patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD) when compared to ASA monotherapy. A potential explanation is that inhibition of factor Xa improves endothelial function through crosstalk between coagulation and inflammatory pathways, subsequently attenuating the occurrence of cardiovascular events. We hypothesize that the addition of rivaroxaban to ASA in PAD patients leads to improved endothelial function. Design: An investigator-initiated, multicentre trial investigating the effect of DPI on endothelial function. Methods: Patients, diagnosed with PAD, were enrolled in two cohorts: cohort A (Rutherford I-III) and cohort B (Rutherford IV-VI). Participants received ASA monotherapy for a 4-weeks run-in period, followed by 12 weeks of DPI. Macro- and microvascular endothelial dysfunction were studied by measuring carotid artery reactivity upon sympathetic stimulus and by measuring plasma endothelin-1 concentrations, respectively. All measurements were performed during the use of ASA (baseline) and after 12 weeks of DPI. Results: 159 PAD patients (111 cohort A, 48 cohort B) were enrolled. Twenty patients discontinued study drugs early. Carotid artery constriction upon sympathetic stimulation at baseline (ASA) and after 12 weeks of DPI was similar in the total group, 22.0 vs. 22.7% (p = 1.000), and in the subgroups (Cohort A 22.6 vs. 23.7%, p = 1.000; cohort B 20.5 vs. 20.5%, p = 1.000), respectively. The mean concentration of plasma endothelin-1 at baseline and after 12 weeks of DPI did not differ, 1.70 ± 0.5 vs. 1.66 ± 0.64 pmol/L (p = 0.440) in the total group, 1.69 ± 0.59 vs. 1.62 ± 0.55 pmol/L in cohort A (p = 0.202), and 1.73 ± 0.53 vs. 1.77 ± 0.82 pmol/L in cohort B (p = 0.682), respectively. Conclusion: Macro- and microvascular endothelial dysfunction, as reflected by carotid artery reactivity and plasma endothelin-1 concentrations, are not influenced in PAD patients by addition of low-dose rivaroxaban to ASA monotherapy for 12 weeks. Trial registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04218656.

6.
Rev Med Interne ; 43(11): 640-644, 2022 Nov.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36068122

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Colchicine is a narrow therapeutic margin drug that does not have the adverse effects of corticosteroids and immunosuppressants. Its use in non-severe ocular inflammatory disease excluding Behcet's disease has not been studied. METHODS: We included patients seen in the internal medicine department of Dijon University Hospital consecutively between September 2020 and September 2021 if they had received colchicine during their pathology. Patients with suspected Behçet's disease were excluded. Treatment efficacy was studied in patients with at least one year of disease progression who had received more than one year of colchicine. Successful treatment was defined as a 50 % reduction in the number of annual relapses on colchicine. RESULTS: Sixteen patients were included (9 women and 7 men). They had recurrent anterior uveitis (n=10), recurrent scleritis (n=5) and intermediate uveitis. Opthalmological involvement was neither severe nor complicated. All patients combined, the annual relapse ratio (ARR) decreased from 1.8 (0.8-3.5) to 0.3 (0-1.6), (P=0.06). Colchicine was considered effective in three of 10 analyzable patients. In only one patient, treatment was stopped for adverse effects after six weeks. CONCLUSION: In view of the interesting benefit-risk ratio of colchicine, it seems appropriate to focus on this molecule in non-granulomatous anterior uveitis and non-severe recurrent scleritis.


Subject(s)
Behcet Syndrome , Scleritis , Uveitis, Anterior , Uveitis , Male , Humans , Female , Behcet Syndrome/complications , Behcet Syndrome/diagnosis , Behcet Syndrome/drug therapy , Colchicine/adverse effects , Scleritis/diagnosis , Scleritis/drug therapy , Scleritis/etiology , Vision Disorders , Uveitis, Anterior/complications , Uveitis, Anterior/drug therapy , Recurrence , Inflammation/complications , Uveitis/diagnosis , Uveitis/drug therapy , Uveitis/etiology
7.
Ann Rheum Dis ; 81(10): 1453-1464, 2022 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35868845

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To test the hypothesis that ROSAH (retinal dystrophy, optic nerve oedema, splenomegaly, anhidrosis and headache) syndrome, caused by dominant mutation in ALPK1, is an autoinflammatory disease. METHODS: This cohort study systematically evaluated 27 patients with ROSAH syndrome for inflammatory features and investigated the effect of ALPK1 mutations on immune signalling. Clinical, immunologic and radiographical examinations were performed, and 10 patients were empirically initiated on anticytokine therapy and monitored. Exome sequencing was used to identify a new pathogenic variant. Cytokine profiling, transcriptomics, immunoblotting and knock-in mice were used to assess the impact of ALPK1 mutations on protein function and immune signalling. RESULTS: The majority of the cohort carried the p.Thr237Met mutation but we also identified a new ROSAH-associated mutation, p.Tyr254Cys.Nearly all patients exhibited at least one feature consistent with inflammation including recurrent fever, headaches with meningeal enhancement and premature basal ganglia/brainstem mineralisation on MRI, deforming arthritis and AA amyloidosis. However, there was significant phenotypic variation, even within families and some adults lacked functional visual deficits. While anti-TNF and anti-IL-1 therapies suppressed systemic inflammation and improved quality of life, anti-IL-6 (tocilizumab) was the only anticytokine therapy that improved intraocular inflammation (two of two patients).Patients' primary samples and in vitro assays with mutated ALPK1 constructs showed immune activation with increased NF-κB signalling, STAT1 phosphorylation and interferon gene expression signature. Knock-in mice with the Alpk1 T237M mutation exhibited subclinical inflammation.Clinical features not conventionally attributed to inflammation were also common in the cohort and included short dental roots, enamel defects and decreased salivary flow. CONCLUSION: ROSAH syndrome is an autoinflammatory disease caused by gain-of-function mutations in ALPK1 and some features of disease are amenable to immunomodulatory therapy.


Subject(s)
Hereditary Autoinflammatory Diseases , NF-kappa B , Protein Kinases/genetics , Amyloidosis , Animals , Cohort Studies , Gain of Function Mutation , Hereditary Autoinflammatory Diseases/genetics , Humans , Inflammation/genetics , Mice , Mutation , NF-kappa B/genetics , NF-kappa B/metabolism , Protein Kinases/metabolism , Quality of Life , Serum Amyloid A Protein , Syndrome , Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors
8.
Int J Infect Dis ; 105: 256-260, 2021 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33508478

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Debate continues regarding the usefulness and benefits of wide prescription of antibiotics in patients hospitalized with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). METHODS: All patients hospitalized in the Infectious Diseases Department, Dijon University Hospital, Dijon, France between 27 February and 30 April 2020 with confirmed COVID-19 were included in this study. Clinical, biological and radiological data were collected, as well as treatment and outcome data. An unfavourable outcome was defined as death or transfer to the intensive care unit. Patient characteristics and outcomes were compared between patients who did and did not receive antibiotic therapy using propensity score matching. FINDINGS: Among the 222 patients included, 174 (78%) received antibiotic therapy. The univariate analysis showed that patients who received antibiotic therapy were significantly older, frailer and had more severe presentation at admission compared with patients who did not receive antibiotic therapy. Unfavourable outcomes were more common in patients who received antibiotic therapy [hazard ratio (HR) 2.94, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.07-8.11; P = 0.04]. Multi-variate analysis and propensity score matching indicated that antibiotic therapy was not significantly associated with outcome (HR 1.612, 95% CI 0.562-4.629; P = 0.37). CONCLUSION: Antibiotics were frequently prescribed in this study and this was associated with more severe presentation at admission. However, antibiotic therapy was not associated with outcome, even after adjustment. In line with recent publications, such data support the need to streamline antibiotic therapy in patients with COVID-19.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , COVID-19 Drug Treatment , SARS-CoV-2 , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , France/epidemiology , Hospitalization , Hospitals, University , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Propensity Score
9.
Lung Cancer ; 146: 341-349, 2020 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32645666

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Non-small-cell lung cancer exhibits a range of transcriptional and epigenetic patterns that not only define distinct phenotypes, but may also govern immune related genes, which have a major impact on survival. METHODS: We used open-source RNA expression and DNA methylation data of the Cancer Genome Atlas with matched non-cancerous tissue to evaluate whether these pretreatment molecular patterns also influenced genes related to the immune system and overall survival. RESULTS: The distinction between lung adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma are determined by 1083 conserved methylation loci and RNA expression of 203 genes which differ for >80 % of patients between the two subtypes. Using the RNA expression profiles of 6 genes, more than 95 % of patients could be correctly classified as having either adeno or squamous cell lung cancer. Comparing tumor tissue with matched normal tissue, no differences in RNA expression were found for costimulatory and co-inhibitory genes, nor genes involved in cytokine release. However, genes involved in antigen presentation had a lower expression and a wider distribution in tumor tissue. DISCUSSION: Only a small number of genes, influenced by DNA methylation, determine the lung cancer subtype. The antigen presentation of cancer cells is dysfunctional, while other T cell immune functions appear to remain intact.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma of Lung , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung , Lung Neoplasms , Adenocarcinoma of Lung/genetics , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/diagnosis , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/genetics , DNA , DNA Methylation , Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/diagnosis , Lung Neoplasms/genetics
10.
Front Immunol ; 11: 614, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32373116

ABSTRACT

Background: Genetic tests for primary immunodeficiency disorders (PIDs) are expensive, time-consuming, and not easily accessible in developing countries. Therefore, we studied the feasibility of a customized single nucleotide variant (SNV) microarray that we developed to detect disease-causing variants and copy number variation (CNV) in patients with PIDs for only 40 Euros. Methods: Probes were custom-designed to genotype 9,415 variants of 277 PID-related genes, and were added to the genome-wide Illumina Global Screening Array (GSA). Data analysis of GSA was performed using Illumina GenomeStudio 2.0, Biodiscovery Nexus 10.0, and R-3.4.4 software. Validation of genotype calling was performed by comparing the GSA with whole-genome sequencing (WGS) data of 56 non-PID controls. DNA samples of 95 clinically diagnosed PID patients, of which 60 patients (63%) had a genetically established diagnosis (by Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) PID panels or Sanger sequencing), were analyzed to test the performance of the GSA. The additional SNVs detected by GSA were validated by Sanger sequencing. Results: Genotype calling of the customized array had an accuracy rate of 99.7%. The sensitivity for detecting rare PID variants was high (87%). The single sample replication in two runs was high (94.9%). The customized GSA was able to generate a genetic diagnosis in 37 out of 95 patients (39%). These 37 patients included 29 patients in whom the genetic variants were confirmed by conventional methods (26 patients by SNV and 3 by CNV analysis), while in 8 patients a new genetic diagnosis was established (6 patients by SNV and 2 patients suspected for leukemia by CNV analysis). Twenty-eight patients could not be detected due to the limited coverage of the custom probes. However, the diagnostic yield can potentially be increased when newly updated variants are added. Conclusion: Our robust customized GSA seems to be a promising first-line rapid screening tool for PIDs at an affordable price, which opens opportunities for low-cost genetic testing in developing countries. The technique is scalable, allows numerous new genetic variants to be added, and offers the potential for genetic testing not only in PIDs, but also in many other genetic diseases.


Subject(s)
Genetic Testing/methods , Genotyping Techniques/methods , High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing/methods , Primary Immunodeficiency Diseases/genetics , Costs and Cost Analysis , DNA Copy Number Variations , Genotyping Techniques/economics , Humans , Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide , Reproducibility of Results
11.
Value Health ; 23(2): 236-241, 2020 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32113629

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The valuation of health states worse than dead is challenging. Currently used time trade-off methods face problems in (1) detecting time-dependent preferences and (2) insensitivity toward severity for states worse than dead. The better-than-dead (BTD) method has the potential to detect time-dependent preferences. This study compares the BTD and composite time trade-off (cTTO) methods at the ordinal level. METHODS: An experiment was conducted in a convenience sample in which respondents (N = 200) valued the same set of 7 health states in the BTD method and cTTO method. Binary BTD responses were used, with response categories of better than dead and worse than dead. Ternary cTTO responses were used, with the additional equal-to-dead response category. Polychoric correlations were used to determine the agreement between these methods. Consistency and test-retest reliability were assessed within methods. RESULTS: Overall agreement between the cTTO and BTD method equaled 77.1% and differed between health states and respondents. For both methods, there were few inconsistencies, and the test-retest reliability was comparable (88%). Health states were more often considered worse than dead in the BTD method (BTD: 54.7%, cTTO: 37.2%). CONCLUSIONS: The high agreement between both methods and the comparable amount of inconsistencies and test-retest reliability suggest that the methods have similar measurement properties. The BTD method yielded higher frequencies of worse-than-dead responses while essentially asking respondents to make similar choices. This accounts for part of the disagreement between the methods. Several explanations are offered for this difference, yet more research is needed to explain this phenomenon.


Subject(s)
Attitude to Death , Health Status Indicators , Health Status , Quality of Life , Activities of Daily Living , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Cost of Illness , Female , Humans , Male , Mental Health , Middle Aged , Reproducibility of Results , Time Factors , Young Adult
12.
Phys Ther ; 100(2): 346-358, 2020 02 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32031656

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The Observable Movement Quality (OMQ) Scale measures generic movement quality. Each item of the OMQ Scale focuses on a different element; together, the 15 items assess the whole construct of movement quality. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the construct validity of the OMQ Scale using 7 hypotheses defined to conform to the Consensus-Based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments. DESIGN: This was an exploratory validation study. METHODS: A pediatric physical therapist assessed motor performance in 101 children using an age-specific motor test and the OMQ Scale. The direction, magnitude, and rationale for 7 hypotheses, which concerned relationships (n = 2), probability of low scores (n = 4), and difference between diagnosis subgroups (n = 1), were defined. RESULTS: The results confirmed 6 of the 7 hypotheses, indicating sufficient construct validity. Significant positive relationships were found between OMQ Scale total scores and the severity of motor disabilities (r = 0.72) and z scores on motor tests (r = 0.60). Probabilities for low scores on OMQ Scale items-exceeding the chi-square critical value-were confirmed for children diagnosed with spasticity, psychomotor retardation, mitochondrial diseases, and ataxia; however, probabilities for low OMQ Scale item scores on strength regulation in children with ataxia were not confirmed. OMQ Scale total scores for children who were not ambulatory because of neurological conditions were significantly different from those for children who were not ambulatory because of fatigue (r = 0.66). LIMITATIONS: The sample of children was based on theoretical assumptions about relevant variations in clinical representations; on the basis of the results, it appears that children with low strength regulation were underrepresented. CONCLUSION: The confirmation of nearly all hypotheses supported the validity of the OMQ Scale for measuring movement quality in clinical practice in addition to standardized age-adequate motor performance tests.


Subject(s)
Ataxia/physiopathology , Mitochondrial Diseases/physiopathology , Motor Activity/physiology , Muscle Spasticity/physiopathology , Psychomotor Disorders/physiopathology , Age Factors , Chi-Square Distribution , Child , Female , Humans , Male , Probability , Reproducibility of Results , Severity of Illness Index
13.
Crit Care Med ; 47(10): e827-e835, 2019 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31306177

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To externally validate two delirium prediction models (early prediction model for ICU delirium and recalibrated prediction model for ICU delirium) using either the Confusion Assessment Method-ICU or the Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist for delirium assessment. DESIGN: Prospective, multinational cohort study. SETTING: Eleven ICUs from seven countries in three continents. PATIENTS: Consecutive, delirium-free adults admitted to the ICU for greater than or equal to 6 hours in whom delirium could be reliably assessed. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The predictors included in each model were collected at the time of ICU admission (early prediction model for ICU delirium) or within 24 hours of ICU admission (recalibrated prediction model for ICU delirium). Delirium was assessed using the Confusion Assessment Method-ICU or the Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist. Discrimination was determined using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. The predictive performance was determined for the Confusion Assessment Method-ICU and Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist cohort, and compared with both prediction models' original reported performance. A total of 1,286 Confusion Assessment Method-ICU-assessed patients and 892 Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist-assessed patients were included. Compared with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.75 (95% CI, 0.71-0.79) in the original study, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the early prediction model for ICU delirium was 0.67 (95% CI, 0.64-0.71) for delirium as assessed using the Confusion Assessment Method-ICU and 0.70 (95% CI, 0.66-0.74) using the Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist. Compared with the original area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.77 (95% CI, 0.74-0.79), the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the recalibrated prediction model for ICU delirium was 0.75 (95% CI, 0.72-0.78) for assessing delirium using the Confusion Assessment Method-ICU and 0.71 (95% CI, 0.67-0.75) using the Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist. CONCLUSIONS: Both the early prediction model for ICU delirium and recalibrated prediction model for ICU delirium are externally validated using either the Confusion Assessment Method-ICU or the Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist for delirium assessment. Per delirium prediction model, both assessment tools showed a similar moderate-to-good statistical performance. These results support the use of either the early prediction model for ICU delirium or recalibrated prediction model for ICU delirium in ICUs around the world regardless of whether delirium is evaluated with the Confusion Assessment Method-ICU or Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist.


Subject(s)
Checklist , Critical Care , Delirium/diagnosis , Models, Theoretical , Adult , Aged , Critical Illness , Female , Humans , Intensive Care Units , Male , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Prospective Studies
14.
Med Decis Making ; 39(5): 605-616, 2019 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31257997

ABSTRACT

Introduction. Health utilities are widely used in health care. The distributions of utilities differ between countries; some countries more often report worse than dead health states, while mild states are valued more or less the same. We hypothesize that cultural values explain these country-related utility differences. Research Question. What is the effect of sociodemographic background, methodological factors, and cultural values on differences in health utilities? Methods and Analyses. Time tradeoff data from 28 EQ-5D valuation studies were analyzed, together with their sociodemographic variables. The dependent variable was Δu, the utility difference between mild and severe states. Country-specific cultural variables were taken from the World Values Survey. Multilevel models were used to analyze the effect of sociodemographic background, methodology (3L v. 5L), and cultural values on Δu. Intraclass correlation (ICC) for country variation was used to assess the impact of the predicting variables on the variation between countries. Results. Substantial variation in Δu was found between countries. Adding cultural values did not reduce ICCs for country variation. Sociodemographic background variables were only weakly associated with Δu and did not affect the ICC. Δu was 0.118 smaller for EQ-5D-5L studies. Discussion.Δu varies between countries. These differences were not explained by national cultural values. In conclusion, despite correction for various variables, utility differences between countries remain substantial and unexplained. This justifies the use of country-specific value sets for instruments such as the EQ-5D.


Subject(s)
Cultural Characteristics , Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Facilities and Services Utilization , Female , Health Status , Health Surveys/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Quality of Life , Socioeconomic Factors
15.
Clin Transl Allergy ; 9: 34, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31333817

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The atopic syndrome consists of heterogeneous manifestations, in which multiple associated genetic loci have recently been identified. It is hypothesized that immune dysregulation plays a role in the pathogenesis. In primary immunodeficiency diseases (PIDs), which are often monogenic immunodysregulation disorders, the atopic syndrome is a frequently occurring comorbidity. Based on the genetic defects in PIDs, novel gene/pathway-targeted therapies have been evaluated, which could be relevant in the atopic syndrome as well. Therefore, we aimed to define subclasses within the atopic syndrome based on the expression profiles of immune cell lineages of healthy mice. METHODS: Overlap between known atopy-related genes as described in the Human Gene Mutation Database and disease-causing genes of monogenic PIDs was evaluated. Clusters of atopy-related genes were based on the overlap in their co-expressed genes using the gene expression profiles of immune cell lineages of healthy mice from the Immunological Genome Project. We analyzed pathways involved in the atopic syndrome using Ingenuity Pathway Analysis. RESULTS: Twenty-two (5.3%) genes were overlapping between the atopy-related genes (n = 160) and PID-related genes (n = 278). We identified seven distinct clusters of atopy-related genes. Functional pathway analysis of all atopy-related genes showed relevance of T helper cell-mediated pathways. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows a model to define clusters within the atopic syndrome based on gene expression profiles of immune cell lineages. Our results support the hypothesis that both genetic mechanisms and immune dysregulation play a role in the pathogenesis. It also opens up the possibility for novel therapeutic targets and a more tailored approach towards personalized medicine.

16.
Psychol Med ; 49(1): 55-65, 2019 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29486807

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: There is a high need for evidence-based psychosocial treatments for adult attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) to offer alongside treatment as usual (TAU). Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT) is a promising psychosocial treatment. This trial investigated the efficacy of MBCT + TAU v. TAU in reducing core symptoms in adults with ADHD. METHODS: A multicentre, single-blind, randomised controlled trial (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02463396). Participants were randomly assigned to MBCT + TAU (n = 60), an 8-weekly group therapy including meditation exercises, psychoeducation and group discussions, or TAU only (n = 60), which reflected usual treatment in the Netherlands and included pharmacotherapy and/or psychoeducation. Primary outcome was ADHD symptoms rated by blinded clinicians. Secondary outcomes included self-reported ADHD symptoms, executive functioning, mindfulness skills, self-compassion, positive mental health and general functioning. Outcomes were assessed at baseline, post-treatment, 3- and 6-month follow-up. Post-treatment effects at group and individual level, and follow-up effects were examined. RESULTS: In MBCT + TAU patients, a significant reduction of clinician-rated ADHD symptoms was found at post-treatment [M difference = -3.44 (-5.75, -1.11), p = 0.004, d = 0.41]. This effect was maintained until 6-month follow-up. More MBCT + TAU (27%) than TAU participants (4%) showed a ⩾30% reduction of ADHD symptoms (p = 0.001). MBCT + TAU patients compared with TAU patients also reported significant improvements in ADHD symptoms, mindfulness skills, self-compassion and positive mental health at post-treatment, which were maintained until 6-month follow-up. Although patients in MBCT + TAU compared with TAU reported no improvement in executive functioning at post-treatment, they did report improvement at 6-month follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: MBCT might be a valuable treatment option alongside TAU for adult ADHD aimed at alleviating symptoms.


Subject(s)
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/therapy , Mindfulness/methods , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Psychotherapy, Group/methods , Adult , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Single-Blind Method
17.
Crit Care ; 22(1): 114, 2018 May 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29728150

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Accurate prediction of delirium in the intensive care unit (ICU) may facilitate efficient use of early preventive strategies and stratification of ICU patients by delirium risk in clinical research, but the optimal delirium prediction model to use is unclear. We compared the predictive performance and user convenience of the prediction  model for delirium (PRE-DELIRIC) and early prediction model for delirium (E-PRE-DELIRIC) in ICU patients and determined the value of a two-stage calculation. METHODS: This 7-country, 11-hospital, prospective cohort study evaluated consecutive adults admitted to the ICU who could be reliably assessed for delirium using the Confusion Assessment Method-ICU or the Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist. The predictive performance of the models was measured using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. Calibration was assessed graphically. A physician questionnaire evaluated user convenience. For the two-stage calculation we used E-PRE-DELIRIC immediately after ICU admission and updated the prediction using PRE-DELIRIC after 24 h. RESULTS: In total 2178 patients were included. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was significantly greater for PRE-DELIRIC (0.74 (95% confidence interval 0.71-0.76)) compared to E-PRE-DELIRIC (0.68 (95% confidence interval 0.66-0.71)) (z score of - 2.73 (p < 0.01)). Both models were well-calibrated. The sensitivity improved when using the two-stage calculation in low-risk patients. Compared to PRE-DELIRIC, ICU physicians (n = 68) rated the E-PRE-DELIRIC model more feasible. CONCLUSIONS: While both ICU delirium prediction models have moderate-to-good performance, the PRE-DELIRIC model predicts delirium better. However, ICU physicians rated the user convenience of E-PRE-DELIRIC superior to PRE-DELIRIC. In low-risk patients the delirium prediction further improves after an update with the PRE-DELIRIC model after 24 h. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02518646 . Registered on 21 July 2015.


Subject(s)
Decision Support Techniques , Delirium/diagnosis , APACHE , Adult , Aged , Area Under Curve , Australia , Belgium , Canada , Cohort Studies , Delirium/prevention & control , Denmark , Female , Humans , Intensive Care Units/organization & administration , Intensive Care Units/statistics & numerical data , Male , Middle Aged , Netherlands , Portugal , Prospective Studies , ROC Curve , United States
18.
PLoS One ; 13(4): e0195260, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29608590

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The treatment of persistent symptoms attributed to Lyme disease remains controversial. Recently, the PLEASE study did not demonstrate any additional clinical benefit of longer-term versus shorter-term antibiotic treatment. However, the economic impact of the antibiotic strategies has not been investigated. METHODS: This prospective economic evaluation, adhering a societal perspective, was performed alongside the PLEASE study, a multicenter, placebo-controlled, double-blind 1:1:1 randomized clinical trial in which all patients received open-label intravenous ceftriaxone for two weeks before the 12-week randomized blinded oral antibiotic regimen (doxycycline, clarithromycin plus hydroxychloroquine, or placebo). Between 2010 and 2013, patients (n = 271) with borreliosis-attributed persistent symptoms were enrolled and followed for one year. Main outcomes were costs, quality-adjusted life years, and incremental net monetary benefit of longer-term versus shorter-term antibiotic therapy. RESULTS: Mean quality-adjusted life years (95% CI) were not significantly different (p = 0.96): 0.82 (0.77-0.88) for ceftriaxone/doxycycline (n = 82), 0.81 (0.76-0.88) for ceftriaxone/clarithromycin-hydroxychloroquine (n = 93), and 0.81 (0.76-0.86) for ceftriaxone/placebo (n = 96). Total societal costs per patient (95% CI) were not significantly different either (p = 0.35): €11,995 (€8,823-€15,670) for ceftriaxone/doxycycline, €12,202 (€9,572-€15,253) for ceftriaxone/clarithromycin-hydroxychloroquine, and €15,249 (€11,294-€19,781) for ceftriaxone/placebo. Incremental net monetary benefit (95% CI) for ceftriaxone/doxycycline compared to ceftriaxone/placebo varied from €3,317 (-€2,199-€8,998) to €4,285 (-€6,085-€14,524) over the willingness-to-pay range, and that of ceftriaxone/clarithromycin-hydroxychloroquine compared to ceftriaxone/placebo from €3,098 (-€888-€7,172) to €3,710 (-€4,254-€11,651). For every willingness-to-pay threshold, the incremental net monetary benefits did not significantly differ from zero. CONCLUSION: The longer-term treatments were similar with regard to costs, effectiveness and cost-effectiveness compared to shorter-term treatment in patients with borreliosis-attributed persistent symptoms after one year of follow-up. Given the results of this study, and taking into account the external costs associated with antibiotic resistance, the shorter-term treatment is the antibiotic regimen of first choice.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Anti-Bacterial Agents/economics , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Lyme Disease/drug therapy , Lyme Disease/economics , Ceftriaxone/administration & dosage , Clarithromycin/administration & dosage , Double-Blind Method , Doxycycline/administration & dosage , Drug Administration Schedule , Drug Therapy, Combination/economics , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Hydroxychloroquine/administration & dosage , Male , Middle Aged , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
19.
Med Decis Making ; 38(6): 627-634, 2018 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29629848

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Scaling severe states can be a difficult task. First, the method of measurement affects whether a health state is considered better or worse than dead. Second, in discrete choice experiments, different models to anchor health states on 0 (dead) and 1 (perfect health) produce varying amounts of health states worse than dead. RESEARCH QUESTION: Within the context of the quality-adjusted life year (QALY) model, this article provides insight into the value assigned to dead and its consequences for decision making. Our research questions are 1) what are the arguments set forth to assign dead the number 0 on the health-utility scale? And 2) what are the effects of the position of dead on the health-utility scale on decision making? METHODS: A literature review was conducted to explore the arguments set forth to assign dead a value of 0 in the QALY model. In addition, scale properties and transformations were considered. RESULTS: The review uncovered several practical and theoretical considerations for setting dead at 0. In the QALY model, indifference between 2 health episodes is not preserved under changes of the origin of the duration scale. Ratio scale properties are needed for the duration scale to preserve indifferences. In combination with preferences and zero conditions for duration and health, it follows that dead should have a value of 0. CONCLUSIONS: The health-utility and duration scales have ratio scale properties, and dead should be assigned the number 0. Furthermore, the position of dead should be carefully established, because it determines how life-saving and life-improving values are weighed in cost-utility analysis.


Subject(s)
Cost-Benefit Analysis/methods , Decision Support Techniques , Health Status , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Data Interpretation, Statistical , Decision Making , Humans , Quality of Life
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...