"When I think about my future, I just see darkness": How youth exiting homelessness navigate the hazy, liminal space between socioeconomic exclusion and inclusion.

OBJECTIVES: The overarching objective of this mixed methods longitudinal study was to understand whether and how rent subsidies and mentorship influenced socioeconomic inclusion outcomes for youth exiting homelessness. The focus of this paper is on the qualitative objectives, which evolved from a primary focus on exploring how study mentorship was working as a facilitator of socioeconomic inclusion to focusing on how participants navigated the hazy, liminal space between socioeconomic exclusion and inclusion. METHODS: This was a convergent mixed methods study scaffolded by community-based participatory action axiology. The quantitative component is reported elsewhere and involved a 2-year pilot randomized controlled trial where 24 participants received rent subsidies and 13 were randomly assigned a study mentor; proxy indicators of socioeconomic inclusion were measured every 6 months for 2.5 years. Qualitative objectives were explored using a qualitative descriptive design and theoretically framed using critical social theory. The lead author interviewed 12 participants every 6 months for 2.5 years. Qualitative interviews were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis with an emphasis on critical interpretation. RESULTS: Navigating the liminal space between socioeconomic exclusion and inclusion was complex and non-linear, and the way youth navigated that journey was more strongly associated with factors like informal mentorship (naturally occurring "coach-like" mentorship) and identity capital (sense of purpose, control, self-efficacy, and self-esteem), rather than whether or not they were assigned a formal study mentor. CONCLUSION: A holistic approach integrating coaching and attention to identity capital alongside economic supports may be key to helping youth exiting homelessness achieve socioeconomic inclusion.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIFS: L'objectif primordial de cette étude longitudinale à méthodes mixtes était de comprendre si et comment les suppléments au loyer et le mentorat influencent les résultats sur le plan de l'inclusion socioéconomique pour les jeunes qui sortent du sans-abrisme. Notre article porte sur des objectifs qualitatifs; à l'origine, il visait principalement à explorer l'efficacité du mentorat des études comme moyen de faciliter l'inclusion socioéconomique, puis il a évolué en s'attachant à la manière dont les participantes et les participants trouvaient leurs repères dans l'espace liminaire flou entre l'exclusion et l'inclusion socioéconomique. MéTHODE: Cette étude à méthodes mixtes convergentes est échafaudée sur l'axiologie de l'action participative communautaire. L'élément quantitatif, qui fait l'objet d'un autre article, a impliqué un essai pilote comparatif randomisé de deux ans où 24 participantes et participants ont reçu des suppléments au loyer, et 13 ont été jumelés de façon aléatoire à un tuteur ou une tutrice scolaire; des indicateurs approximatifs de l'inclusion socioéconomique ont été mesurés tous les six mois pendant deux ans et demi. Les objectifs qualitatifs ont été explorés à l'aide d'un protocole descriptif qualitatif et encadrés théoriquement par la théorie sociale critique. L'autrice principale a interviewé 12 participantes et participants tous les six mois pendant deux ans et demi. Les entretiens qualitatifs ont été analysés en employant l'analyse thématique réflexive et en mettant l'accent sur l'interprétation critique. RéSULTATS: L'exploration de l'espace liminaire entre l'exclusion et l'inclusion socioéconomique était complexe et non linéaire, et le parcours des jeunes était davantage associé à des facteurs comme le mentorat informel (le mentorat naturel semblable à celui d'un entraîneur ou d'une entraîneuse) et le capital identitaire (le sentiment d'avoir un but, le contrôle, l'auto-efficacité et l'estime de soi) qu'au fait d'avoir ou non été jumelés à un tuteur ou une tutrice dans leurs études. CONCLUSION: Une démarche holistique intégrant l'encadrement et l'attention au capital identitaire, en plus des mesures de soutien économique, pourrait être essentielle pour aider les jeunes qui sortent du sans-abrisme à s'intégrer sur le plan socioéconomique.

Effect of Portable Rent Subsidies and Mentorship on Socioeconomic Inclusion for Young People Exiting Homelessness: A Community-Based Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: There have been no published randomized clinical trials with a primary outcome of socioeconomic inclusion for young people who have experienced homelessness. Objective: To explore whether young people exiting homelessness who received rent subsidies and adult mentorship experienced more socioeconomic inclusion relative to young people who received only rent subsidies. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a convergent mixed-methods, unblinded, 2-group, parallel randomized clinical trial with 1:1 allocation embedded within a community-based framework in 3 cities in Ontario, Canada. Participants were enrolled between March 1 and September 30, 2019, and were followed up through March 31, 2022. Interventions: Participants (n = 24) were randomly assigned adult mentors (n = 13) who had been recruited and screened by community partner agencies. All participants received portable rent subsidies (subsidy not tied to a specific location) for 2 years. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary quantitative outcomes were self-reported measures of community integration (psychological and physical) and self-esteem-proxy indicators of socioeconomic inclusion. Community integration was measured with the Community Integration Scale, with a score range of 1 to 7 for the physical component and 4 to 20 for the psychological component; higher scores indicate higher integration. Self-esteem was measured with the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale, with a score range of 0 to 30; higher scores indicate greater self-esteem. Secondary quantitative outcomes included social connectedness, hopelessness, and academic and vocational participation. All analyses followed the intention-to-treat principle. Results: A total of 24 youths (12 women [50.0%]; mean [SD] age, 21.8 [2.2] years [range, 18-26 years]; race and ethnicity: 10 White [41.7%], 8 Black [33.3%], 2 Asian [8.3%], 2 Indigenous [8.3%], and 2 different choice [8.3%]) transitioned out of homelessness and into market-rent housing. All youths in the group that received mentorship and in the group that did not receive mentorship had stable or nonsignificant improvements in all study outcomes at the primary end point of 18 months compared with baseline (mean [SD] Community Integration Scale psychological score: mentorship group, 11.3 [2.6] at baseline and 11.2 [3.9] at 18 months; no-mentorship group, 10.8 [4.1] at baseline and 13.2 [2.9] at 18 months; mean [SD] Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale score: mentorship group, 16.0 [4.6] at baseline and 18.1 [5.2] at 18 months; no-mentorship group, 16.3 [6.1] at baseline and 19.6 [5.7] at 18 months). However, there were no significant differences between the 2 groups in the Community Integration Scale psychological score (adjusted mean difference, -2.0; 95% CI, -5.0 to 1.0; P = .18) and Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale score (adjusted mean difference, -1.4; 95% CI, -5.0 to 2.3; P = .44) 18 months after randomization. Ancillary analysis suggested that youths with informal mentors (mentors outside the study) at baseline felt more psychologically integrated at 18 months relative to those with no informal mentors at baseline (adjusted mean difference, 3.6; 95% CI, 0.4-6.8; P = .03). Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial, COVID-19 pandemic-related restrictions made it challenging for mentors and mentees to connect, which may have affected the findings. Steady socioeconomic outcomes-potentially attributable to portable rent subsidies-are noteworthy, given the socioeconomic inequities this population has faced during the COVID-19 pandemic. The possible benefit of informal mentorship warrants further investigation. This small pilot study was designed with the intention of generating data and hypotheses for a full-scale study; findings should be interpreted with caution. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03779204.