Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Comput Biol Med ; 95: 209-216, 2018 04 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29524805

ABSTRACT

RATIONALE: A hemodynamic relationship of pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) to pulmonary acceleration time (PAcT) has not yet been explicitly presented. OBJECTIVE: We employed a logistic-based systolic model with a subtle modification for pulmonary circulation and provided a logical ground for the relationship between systolic PAP and PAcT using transthoracic echocardiography. Additionally, the logistic-based PAP estimation equation was deduced from the model to relate systolic PAP and PAcT. METHODS AND RESULTS: This equation was statistically tested in comparison to existing PAP estimation equations. Results showed that the logistic-based PAP estimation equation was at least as accurate as previous equations with respect to previously published mean PAP versus PAcT values. After the subtle pulmonary modification of the model, the pulmonary blood flow velocity and pressure not only well reflected the underlying pulmonary circulation physiology, but could also be presented in harmony with systemic circulation physiology. CONCLUSIONS: A future clinical study with actual systolic PAP versus PAcT measurements is needed to test the application of the logistic-based PAP estimation equation.


Subject(s)
Blood Pressure Determination/methods , Blood Pressure , Models, Cardiovascular , Pulmonary Artery/physiopathology , Humans
2.
PLoS One ; 13(1): e0191628, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29360840

ABSTRACT

IMPORTANCE: This review provides a comprehensive comparison of treatment outcomes between robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery (RLS) and conventional laparoscopic surgery (CLS) based on randomly-controlled trials (RCTs). OBJECTIVES: We employed RCTs to provide a systematic review that will enable the relevant community to weigh the effectiveness and efficacy of surgical robotics in controversial fields on surgical procedures both overall and on each individual surgical procedure. EVIDENCE REVIEW: A search was conducted for RCTs in PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases from 1981 to 2016. Among a total of 1,517 articles, 27 clinical reports with a mean sample size of 65 patients per report (32.7 patients who underwent RLS and 32.5 who underwent CLS), met the inclusion criteria. FINDINGS: CLS shows significant advantages in total operative time, net operative time, total complication rate, and operative cost (p < 0.05 in all cases), whereas the estimated blood loss was less in RLS (p < 0.05). As subgroup analyses, conversion rate on colectomy and length of hospital stay on hysterectomy statistically favors RLS (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Despite higher operative cost, RLS does not result in statistically better treatment outcomes, with the exception of lower estimated blood loss. Operative time and total complication rate are significantly more favorable with CLS.


Subject(s)
Laparoscopy/methods , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Robotic Surgical Procedures/methods , Robotics , Humans , Treatment Outcome
3.
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg ; 52(4): 673-678, 2017 Oct 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29156011

ABSTRACT

We investigated the survival benefit of pulmonary resection for patients with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. To weigh the survival benefit of pulmonary resection for patients with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis who have undergone surgical treatment combined with medical chemotherapy compared with medical chemotherapy alone, we did a meta-analysis of available studies containing a hazard ratio for pulmonary resection. Among 1726 articles, 6 clinical reports, with a mean sample size of 47 patients per report, met the inclusion criteria. The pooled hazard ratio of 0.68 with a 95% confidence interval of approximately 0.44-1.07 suggested that the survival benefit of surgical pulmonary resection combined with chemotherapy, in a comparison of the groups 'with surgery' and 'without surgery', is not significantly greater than that of chemotherapy alone. Selection bias, due to the absence of rigid predetermined indications for pulmonary resection, limited the validity of this analysis. Due to the heterogeneity of the patient groups, greater attention is required to compute additional hazard ratios in future studies with stratification of factors such as cardiopulmonary functions, disease extent and the presence of a cavity. These additional computations in future studies are necessary to determine the survival benefit and to support the rigid surgical indications.


Subject(s)
Lung/surgery , Pneumonectomy/methods , Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant/surgery , Tuberculosis, Pulmonary/surgery , Global Health , Humans , Survival Rate/trends , Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant/mortality , Tuberculosis, Pulmonary/mortality
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL