Effect of Age at Cochlear Implantation in Educational Placement and Peer Relationships.

OBJECTIVES: The education and school life of children who have undergone cochlear implantation (CI) is very important and should be monitored continuously. This study assessed auditory performance in children with cochlear implants over time, along with educational placement and peer relationship, and compared the results based on the age at CI and the presence of additional disabilities. DESIGN: In total, 77 children who had undergone CI at the Hearing Center in Ajou University Hospital at less than 10 years old and who were presently attending school or had already graduated from school within 3 years were enrolled in this study. All children had congenital bilateral severe or profound hearing loss at the diagnosis. They were classified based on the age at which they received CI: the "early-implanted group," younger than 3.5 years (n = 38), and the "late-implanted group," between 3.5 and 10 years old (n = 39). RESULTS: The early-implanted group had worse short-term auditory performance than the late group, but after 2 years of the implant use, auditory performance was similar in both groups. The early and late groups did not differ significantly in terms of the proportions of children who were enrolled in a regular school (94.7% and 89.7%, respectively). However, the early-implanted group had a larger proportion of children who were enrolled in a regular school without additional needs (73.0%), compared with the late group (48.6%) (p = .034). Children with multiple disabilities showed poorer performance (word score of 57.7% and sentence score of 44.7%) than children with hearing disability only (91.8% and 87.2%, respectively), which affected full-time enrollment in regular schools. With regard to peer relationships, 19.0% of children in the early-implanted group required close observation and assistance, and 9.5% even required help and counseling. Children who underwent early CI had a high tendency toward social restraint, apathy, and over-commitment. No correlations were observed between audiological factors and the aspects of peer relationships assessed in this study. CONCLUSIONS: Early CI and the absence of other disabilities were the two main factors that increased the likelihood of full-time enrollment in mainstream classes at regular schools. Nevertheless, many children who underwent earlier CI still encountered difficulties in peer relationships.

Critical Factors for Binaural Hearing in Children with Bilateral Sequential Cochlear Implantation: First Implant Performance and Inter-Implant Interval.

OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the influence of the performance of the first cochlear implant (CI-1) on the second implant (CI-2) and the significance of inter-implant intervals in children with sequential cochlear implantation. METHOD: Thirty-four patients were included for speech perception outcome and 38 patients were included for subjective hearing satisfaction in daily life in this study. The patients were classified into 3 groups according to inter-implant interval: group I, <4 years; group II, 4-7 years; group III, >7 years. Open-set speech perception scores before and at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after the second implantation was compared among the CI-1, CI-2, and bilateral CI conditions. Subjective hearing benefits in daily life were measured using a questionnaire of Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ) for parents of children with impaired hearing, and device use and preference were evaluated (by phone interview.) Results: The speech perception of children using the CI-2 only improved quickly within 3 months postoperatively and were similar to those using the CI-1 only. The results of monosyllabic and disyllabic word tests using CI-2 at 3 months after second implantation were not significantly different from those in patients using the CI-1 only. In the sentence test, the scores using the CI-2 only were not significantly different from those using the first implant only at 6 months after second implantation. SSQ scores were similar among groups and the worst score in each section was shown from the questions about performance under noisy conditions in each section. Device usage habits showed that 17 (44.7%) and 16 (42.1%) patients preferred bilateral and the CI-1, respectively. Only 5 (13.2%) patients wanted the CI-2 rather than the CI-1. While group I and II showed a prominent positive attitude to bilateral use, group III, for which the inter-implant interval was 7 years or more, showed a definite preference for the CI-1 (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Functional binaural benefits were achieved in patients who were good performers with the CI-1 after the second implantation irrespective of the inter-implant interval. Sequential CI should be strongly recommended for patients with unilateral CI showing a good performance.