Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
J Clin Microbiol ; 55(1): 183-198, 2017 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27807153

ABSTRACT

Extensively drug-resistant (XDR) tuberculosis (TB) cannot be easily or quickly diagnosed. We developed a rapid, automated assay for the detection of XDR-TB plus resistance to the drug isoniazid (INH) for point-of-care use. Using a simple filter-based cartridge with an integrated sample processing function, the assay identified a wide selection of wild-type and mutant sequences associated with XDR-TB directly from sputum. Four new large-Stokes-shift fluorophores were developed. When these four Stokes-shift fluorophores were combined with six conventional fluorophores, 10-color probe detection in a single PCR tube was enabled. A new three-phase, double-nested PCR approach allowed robust melting temperature analysis with enhanced limits of detection (LODs). Finally, newly designed sloppy molecular beacons identified many different mutations using a small number of probes. The assay correctly distinguished wild-type sequences from 32 commonly occurring mutant sequences tested in gyrA, gyrB, katG, and rrs genes and the promoters of inhA and eis genes responsible for resistance to INH, the fluoroquinolone (FQ) drugs, amikacin (AMK), and kanamycin (KAN). The LOD was 300 CFU of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in 1 ml sputum. The rate of detection of heteroresistance by the assay was equivalent to that by Sanger sequencing. In a blind study of 24 clinical sputum samples, resistance mutations were detected in all targets with 100% sensitivity, with the specificity being 93.7 to 100%. Compared to the results of phenotypic susceptibility testing, the sensitivity of the assay was 75% for FQs and 100% each for INH, AMK, and KAN and the specificity was 100% for INH and FQ and 94% for AMK and KAN. Our approach could enable testing for XDR-TB in point-of-care settings, potentially identifying highly drug-resistant TB more quickly and simply than currently available methods.


Subject(s)
Antitubercular Agents/pharmacology , Extensively Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis/diagnosis , Molecular Diagnostic Techniques/methods , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/drug effects , Point-of-Care Systems , Alleles , Amikacin/pharmacology , Automation, Laboratory/methods , DNA, Bacterial/genetics , Extensively Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis/microbiology , Fluoroquinolones/pharmacology , Genes, Bacterial , Humans , Isoniazid/pharmacology , Kanamycin/pharmacology , Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Sensitivity and Specificity
2.
PLoS One ; 10(5): e0126257, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25938476

ABSTRACT

Several molecular assays to detect resistance to Rifampin, the Fluoroquinolones, and Aminoglycosides in Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M. tuberculosis) have been recently described. A systematic approach for comparing these assays in the laboratory is needed in order to determine the relative advantage of each assay and to decide which ones should be advanced to evaluation. We performed an analytic comparison of a Sloppy Molecular Beacon (SMB) melting temperature (Tm) assay and a Dual labeled probe (DLP) Tm assay. Both assays targeted the M. tuberculosis rpoB, gyrA, rrs genes and the eis promoter region. The sensitivity and specificity to detect mutations, analytic limit of detection (LOD) and the detection of heteroresistance were tested using a panel of 56 clinical DNA samples from drug resistant M. tuberculosis strains. Both SMB and DLP assays detected 29/29 (100%) samples with rpoB RRDR mutations and 3/3 (100%) samples with eis promoter mutations correctly. The SMB assay detected all 17/17 gyrA mutants and 22/22 rrs mutants, while the DLP assay detected 16/17 (94%) gyrA mutants and 12/22 (55%) rrs mutants. Both assays showed comparable LODs for detecting rpoB and eis mutations; however, the SMB assay LODs were at least two logs better for detecting wild type and mutants in gyrA and rrs targets. The SMB assay was also moderately better at detecting heteroresistance. In summary, both assays appeared to be promising methods to detect drug resistance associated mutations in M. tuberculosis; however, the relative advantage of each assay varied under each test condition.


Subject(s)
Antitubercular Agents/pharmacology , Molecular Diagnostic Techniques , Mutation , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/drug effects , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/genetics , Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant/microbiology , Aminoglycosides/pharmacology , DNA Mutational Analysis , DNA, Bacterial , Fluoroquinolones/pharmacology , Humans , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Polymerase Chain Reaction , Reproducibility of Results , Rifampin/pharmacology , Sensitivity and Specificity , Sputum/microbiology , Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant/diagnosis
3.
J Clin Microbiol ; 53(1): 43-51, 2015 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25339395

ABSTRACT

Resistance to amikacin (AMK) and kanamycin (KAN) in clinical Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains is largely determined by specific mutations in the rrs gene and eis gene promoter. We developed a rapid, multiplexed sloppy molecular beacon (SMB) assay to identify these mutations and then evaluated assay performance on 603 clinical M. tuberculosis DNA samples collected in South Korea. Assay performance was compared to gold-standard phenotypic drug susceptibility tests, including Lowenstein-Jensen (LJ) absolute concentration, mycobacterial growth indicator tubes (MGIT), and TREK Sensititre MycoTB MIC plate (MycoTB) methods. Target amplicons were also tested for mutations by Sanger sequencing. The SMB assay correctly detected 115/116 mutant and mixed sequences and 487/487 wild-type sequences (sensitivity and specificity of 99.1 and 100%, respectively). Using the LJ method as the reference, sensitivity and specificity for AMK resistance were 92.2% and 100%, respectively, and sensitivity and specificity for KAN resistance were 87.7% and 95.6%, respectively. Mutations in the rrs gene were unequivocally associated with high-level cross-resistance to AMK and KAN in all three conventional drug susceptibility testing methods. However, eis promoter mutations were associated with KAN resistance using the MGIT or MycoTB methods but not the LJ method. No testing method associated eis promoter mutations with AMK resistance. Among the discordant samples with AMK and/or KAN resistance but wild-type sequence at the target genes, we discovered four new mutations in the whiB7 5' untranslated region (UTR) in 6/22 samples. All six samples were resistant only to KAN, suggesting the possible role of these whiB7 5' UTR mutations in KAN resistance.


Subject(s)
Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial , Genotyping Techniques , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/drug effects , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/genetics , Tuberculosis/microbiology , Amikacin/pharmacology , Amikacin/therapeutic use , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial/genetics , Genes, Bacterial , Genotyping Techniques/methods , Genotyping Techniques/standards , Humans , Kanamycin Resistance , Microbial Sensitivity Tests/methods , Microbial Sensitivity Tests/standards , Mutation , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity , Sequence Analysis, DNA , Tuberculosis/diagnosis , Tuberculosis/drug therapy , Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant/diagnosis , Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant/drug therapy , Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant/microbiology
4.
J Clin Microbiol ; 50(7): 2194-202, 2012 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22535987

ABSTRACT

Rifampin resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis is largely determined by mutations in an 80-bp rifampin resistance determining region (RRDR) of the rpoB gene. We developed a rapid single-well PCR assay to identify RRDR mutations. The assay uses sloppy molecular beacons to probe an asymmetric PCR of the M. tuberculosis RRDR by melting temperature (T(m)) analysis. A three-point T(m) code is generated which distinguishes wild-type from mutant RRDR DNA sequences in approximately 2 h. The assay was validated on synthetic oligonucleotide targets containing the 44 most common RRDR mutations. It was then tested on a panel of DNA extracted from 589 geographically diverse clinical M. tuberculosis cultures, including isolates with wild-type RRDR sequences and 25 different RRDR mutations. The assay detected 236/236 RRDR mutant sequences as mutant (sensitivity, 100%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 98 to 100%) and 353/353 RRDR wild-type sequences as wild type (specificity, 100%; 95% CI, 98.7 to 100%). The assay identified 222/225 rifampin-resistant isolates as rifampin resistant (sensitivity, 98.7%; 95% CI, 95.8 to 99.6%) and 335/336 rifampin-susceptible isolates as rifampin susceptible (specificity, 99.7%; 95% CI, 95.8 to 99.6%). All mutations were either individually identified or clustered into small mutation groups using the triple T(m) code. The assay accurately identified mixed (heteroresistant) samples and was shown analytically to detect RRDR mutations when present in at least 40% of the total M. tuberculosis DNA. This was at least as accurate as Sanger DNA sequencing. The assay was easy to use and well suited for high-throughput applications. This new sloppy molecular beacon assay should greatly simplify rifampin resistance testing in clinical laboratories.


Subject(s)
Antitubercular Agents/pharmacology , Drug Resistance, Bacterial , Molecular Diagnostic Techniques/methods , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/drug effects , Rifampin/pharmacology , Bacterial Proteins/genetics , DNA-Directed RNA Polymerases , Humans , Microbial Sensitivity Tests/methods , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/genetics , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/isolation & purification , Oligonucleotide Probes/chemistry , Oligonucleotide Probes/genetics , Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Sensitivity and Specificity , Time Factors , Transition Temperature , Tuberculosis/microbiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...