Is it necessary to use a cervical brace after single- or double-level ACDF?

Although anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is one of the most frequently performed spinal surgeries, there is no consensus regarding the necessity of prescribing a cervical brace after surgery. This study aimed to investigate any difference in radiological and clinical outcomes when wearing or not wearing cervical braces after single- or double-level ACDF. We examined 2 cohorts of patients who underwent single- or double-level ACDF surgery with and without a cervical brace: patients who underwent ACDF between March 2018 and December 2019 received a cervical brace, while patients who underwent ACDF between January 2020 and May 2021 did not. Each patient was evaluated radiologically and functionally using plain X-ray, modified Japanese Orthopedic Association score, and visual analog scale for neck and arm until 12 months after surgery. Fusion rate, subsidence, and postoperative complications were also evaluated. Eighty-three patients were included in the analysis: 38 were braced and 45 were not. The demographic characteristics and baseline outcome measures of both groups were similar. There was no statistically significant difference in any of the clinical measures at baseline. The modified Japanese Orthopedic Association score and visual analog scale for neck and arm were similar in both groups at all time intervals and showed statistically significant improvement when compared with preoperative scores. In addition, fusion rate, subsidence, and postoperative complications were similar in both groups. Our results suggest that the use of cervical braces does not improve the clinical outcomes of individuals undergoing single- or double-level ACDF.

Frailty is not an independent risk factor for worse clinical outcomes in lumbar spinal surgery: a prospective cohort study.

PURPOSE: Recently, many studies revealed that frailty affects unfavorably on postoperative outcomes in lumbar spinal diseases. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between frailty and clinical outcomes while identifying risk factors associated with worse clinical outcomes following lumbar spinal surgery. METHODS: From March 2019 to February 2021, we prospectively enrolled eligible patients with degenerative lumbar spinal diseases requiring surgery. Frailty was assessed preoperatively. To identify the impact of frailty on lumbar spinal diseases, clinical outcomes, which were measured with patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and postoperative complications, were compared according to the frailty. PROs were assessed preoperatively and one year postoperatively. In addition, risk factors for preoperative and postoperative worse clinical outcomes were investigated. RESULTS: PROs were constantly lower in the frail group than in the non-frail group before and after surgery, and the change of PROs between before and after surgery and postoperative complications were not different between the groups. In addition, frailty was a persistent risk factor for postoperative worse clinical outcome before and after surgery in lumbar spinal surgery. CONCLUSION: Frailty persistently affects the clinical outcome negatively before and after surgery in lumbar spinal surgery. However, as the change of the clinical outcome is not different between the frail group and the non-frail group, it is difficult to interpret whether the frail patients are vulnerable to the surgery. In conclusion, frailty is not an independent risk factor for worse clinical outcome in lumbar spinal surgery.

Quantitative Analysis of the Effect of Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Postoperative Residual Cervical Dumbbell Tumors: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVE: Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has been performed for spinal tumors. However, the quantitative effect of SRS on postoperative residual cervical dumbbell tumors remains unknown. This study aimed to quantitatively evaluate the efficacy of SRS for treating postoperative residual cervical dumbbell tumors. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed cases of postoperative residual cervical dumbbell tumors from 1995 to 2020 in 2 tertiary institutions. Residual tumors underwent SRS (SRS group) or were observed with clinical and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) follow-up (observation group). Tumor regrowth rates were compared between the SRS and observation groups. Additionally, risk factors for tumor regrowth were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 28 cervical dumbbell tumors were incompletely resected. Eight patients were in the SRS group, and 20 in the observation group. The mean regrowth rate was not significantly lower (p = 0.784) in the SRS group (0.18 ± 0.29 mm/mo) than in the observation group (0.33 ± 0.40 mm/mo). In the multivariable Cox regression analysis, SRS was not a significant variable (hazard ratio [HR], 0.57; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.18-1.79; p = 0.336). CONCLUSION: SRS did not significantly decrease the tumor regrowth rate in our study. We believe that achieving maximal resection during the initial operation is more important than postoperative adjuvant SRS.

Are There Advantages in Cervical Intrafacetal Fusion With Minimal Posterolateral Fusion (PLF) Compared to Conventional PLF in Posterior Cervical Fusion?

OBJECTIVE: We propose that cervical intrafacetal fusion (cIFF) using bone chip insertion into the facetal joint space additional to minimal PLF is a supplementary fusion method to conventional posterolateral fusion (PLF). METHODS: Patients who underwent posterior cervical fixation accompanied by cIFF with minimal PLF or conventional PLF for cervical myelopathy from 2012 to 2023 were investigated retrospectively. Radiological parameters including Cobb angle and C2-7 sagittal vertical axis (SVA) were compared between the 2 groups. In cIFF with minimal PLF group, cIFF location and PLF location were carefully divided, and the fusion rates of each location were analyzed by computed tomography scan. RESULTS: Among enrolled 46 patients, 31 patients were in cIFF group, 15 in PLF group. The postoperative change of Cobb angle in 1-year follow-up in cIFF with minimal PLF group and conventional PLF group were 0.1° ± 4.0° and -9.7° ± 8.4° respectively which was statistically lower in cIFF with minimal PLF group (p = 0.022). Regarding the fusion rate in cIFF with minimal PLF group in postoperative 6 months, the rates was achieved in 267 facets (98.1%) in cIFF location, and 244 facets (89.7%) in PLF location (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Postoperative sagittal alignment was more preserved in cIFF with minimal PLF group compared with conventional PLF group. Additionally, in cIFF with minimal PLF group, the bone fusion rate of cIFF location was higher than PLF location. Considering the concerns of bone chip migration onto the spinal cord and relatively low fusion rate in PLF method, applying cIFF method using minimized PLF might be a beneficial alternative for posterior cervical decompression and fixation.

Unilateral Pediculectomy and Reduction with Short-Segment Pedicle Screw Fixation for Thoracolumbar Burst Fracture: A Case Series.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of unilateral pediculectomy and reduction with short-segment pedicle screw fixation for thoracolumbar burst fracture. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent a unilateral pediculectomy and reduction with short-segment fixation and interbody fusion for thoracolumbar burst fracture. The unilateral pediculectomy created sufficient space to approach the ventral side of the spinal cord for removing bone fragments and insertion of an interbody cage to correct kyphosis. Lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic incidence (PI) minus LL, and segmental Cobb angle were measured at 3 time points: preoperatively, postoperatively, and final follow-up. Furthermore, sagittal vertical axis (SVA) was measured to assess global sagittal balance at the final follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 10 patients, with a mean age of 39.8 ± 21.0, underwent the surgical procedure. All patients had a thoracolumbar injury classification and severity score > 5. The mean follow-up period was 15.8 ± 13.9 months. The mean postoperative LL (46.0 ± 5.8) was significantly higher (P = 0.008) than the preoperative measurement (32.8 ± 8.2). The mean postoperative PI minus LL (2.2 ± 8.4) was not significantly lower (P = 0.051) than preoperative measurement (15.4 ± 12.6). The mean postoperative segmental Cobb angle (11.4 ± 8.4) was significantly higher (P < 0.001) than the preoperative measurement (-11.6 ± 10.9). At the final follow-up, the mean sagittal vertical axiswas 10.0 ± 28.8 mm. CONCLUSIONS: Unilateral pediculectomy and reduction with short-segment fixation and interbody fusion served as an efficient surgical method for thoracolumbar burst fracture.

Effectiveness of intraoperative table modification for achieving lumbar lordosis in multilevel lumbar fusion surgery: a propensity score-matched study.

BACKGROUND: In multilevel posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) with posterior screw fixation, obtaining sufficient lumbar lordosis (LL) is difficult, especially in patients with osteoporosis. We performed intraoperative table modification (TM) using gravitational dropping of the patient's lumbar spine, to improve restoration of LL. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients who underwent three- or four-level PLIF between 2005 and 2019. One hundred eleven patients were enrolled, with 96 patients receiving non-TM-PLIF and 15 patients receiving TM-PLIF. Radiological parameters, including segmental lordosis (SL), LL, sacral slope (SS), pelvic incidence, and pelvic tilt, were measured. Clinical outcomes were measured using a visual analogue scale (VAS) for the back and leg preoperatively and at the last follow-up. Additionally, the correlation between the bone mineral density (BMD) and the radiological parameters was calculated for TM-PLIF. We performed propensity score matching between the groups to control the baseline difference. RESULTS: We found a statistically better correction between immediate and last follow-up postoperative SL (p = 0.04), as well as between preoperative and last follow-up SL (p < 0.01) in the TM-PLIF group compared to that in the non-TM-PLIF group. VAS for the back and leg were not significantly different between the two groups. Additionally, the efficacy of lordosis correction in the TM-PLIF group showed a statistically significant negative correlation between BMD and the SS change both before and after the surgery (rho = -0.60, p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Whilst further study is required to conclusively establish its efficacy, TM-PLIF (table modification using gravitational dropping) shows potential advantages for restoring and maintaining LL in multilevel lumbar fusion, particularly in cases with low BMD.

Management of Cerebrospinal Fluid Leakage by Pump-Regulated Volumetric Continuous Lumbar Drainage Following Anterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion for Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament.

OBJECTIVE: Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage is a major concern related to anterior cervical decompression and fusion for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL). We propose a management algorithm for CSF leakage following anterior cervical decompression and fusion for OPLL involving the use of pump-regulated volumetric continuous lumbar drainage. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent anterior cervical decompression and fusion for OPLL and were managed with the proposed algorithm between March 2018 and July 2022. The proposed management algorithm for CSF leakage by pump-regulated volumetric continuous lumbar drainage was as follows. On exposure of the arachnoid membrane with or without CSF leakage, a dural sealant patch was applied to manage the dural defect. In case of persistent CSF leakage despite application of the dural sealant patch, patients underwent pump-regulated volumetric continuous lumbar drainage. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients were included in the study. CSF leakage occurred in 14 patients. Of these 14 patients, 9 patients underwent lumbar drain insertion according to the proposed management algorithm. Successful resolution of CSF leakage was observed in 8 of the 9 patients who underwent lumbar drainage. All patients were encouraged to ambulate without concern of CSF overdrainage due to gravity, because it could be avoided with pump-regulated volumetric continuous CSF drainage. Therefore, complications associated with absolute bed rest or CSF overdrainage were not observed. CONCLUSION: The proposed management algorithm with pump-regulated volumetric continuous lumbar drainage showed safety and efficacy for management of CSF leakage following anterior decompression and fusion for OPLL.

Sacropelvic Fixation for Adult Deformity Surgery Comparing Iliac Screw and Sacral 2 Alar-Iliac Screw Fixation: Systematic Review and Updated Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Two commonly used techniques for spinopelvic fixation in adult deformity surgery are iliac screw (IS) and sacral 2 alar-iliac screw (S2AI) fixations. In this article, we systematically meta-analyzed the complications of sacropelvic fixation for adult deformity surgery comparing IS and S2AI. METHODS: The PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane clinical trial databases were systematically searched until March 29, 2023. The proportion of postoperative complications, including implant failure, revision, screw prominence, and wound complications after sacropelvic fixation, were pooled with a random-effects model. Subgroup analyses for the method of sacropelvic fixation were conducted. RESULTS: Ten studies with a total of 1,931 patients (IS, 925 patients; S2AI, 1,006 patients) were included. The pooled proportion of implant failure was not statistically different between the IS and S2AI groups (21.9% and 18.9%, respectively) (p = 0.59). However, revision was higher in the IS group (21.0%) than that in the S2AI group (8.5%) (p = 0.02). Additionally, screw prominence was higher in the IS group (9.6%) than that in the S2AI group (0.0%) (p < 0.01), and wound complication was also higher in the IS group (31.7%) than that in the S2AI group (3.9%) (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: IS and S2AI fixations showed that both techniques had similar outcomes in terms of implant failure. However, S2AI was revealed to have better outcomes than IS in terms of revision, screw prominence, and wound complications.

Meta-Analysis on the Effect of Hypothermia in Acute Spinal Cord Injury.

OBJECTIVE: Acute spinal cord injury (SCI) can result in debilitating motor, sensory, and autonomic dysfunction. As a treatment option, therapeutic hypothermia has been researched to inadequate pharmaceutical treatment, except for methylprednisolone. In this article, we systematically meta-analyzed to clarify the effect of hypothermia in acute SCI on neurological outcomes. METHODS: The PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane clinical trial databases were systematically searched until June 30, 2022. The proportion of cases with improved neurological status after hypothermia in acute SCI were pooled with a random-effects model. Subgroup analyses for the method of hypothermia and injury level were conducted. RESULTS: Eight studies with a total of 103 patients were included. Hypothermia in acute SCI improved neurological function by 55.8% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 39.4%-72.1%). The subgroup analysis revealed that the pooled proportion of cases showing neurological improvement was higher with systemic hypothermia (70.9%) (95% CI, 14.9%-100%) than with local hypothermia (52.5%) (95% CI, 40.4%-64.5%), although the subgroup difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.53). Another subgroup analysis revealed that the proportion of cases with neurological improvement did not differ statistically between the cervical spine (61.4%) (95% CI, 42.2%-80.6%) and thoracic spine injury groups (59.4%) (95% CI, 34.8%-84.0%) (p = 0.90). CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis identified that more than 50% of patients showed neurological improvement after hypothermia following acute SCI in general. A multicenter, randomized, double-blind study with larger sample size is necessary to validate the findings further.

Surgical strategy for metastatic spinal tumor patients with surgically challenging situation.

The incidence of spinal metastasis is increasing as cancer patients live longer owing to the improvement of cancer treatments. However, traditional surgery (TS) which fixates at least 2 levels above and 2 levels below the affected vertebrae is sometimes difficult to perform as it is burdensome to the patients. In this article, we introduce our experience and strategy in treating spinal metastasis, focusing particularly on challenging cases. We retrospectively reviewed the data of 110 patients who underwent spinal surgery for metastatic spinal tumors from April 2018 to March 2020. Among them, 5 patients who received anterior approach surgery were excluded. The remaining 105 patients were enrolled. In addition to TS, we also performed cervical pedicle screw, cervicothoracic junction fixation, thoracolumbar short fixation, and decompression surgery, depending on the characteristics of the tumor. The overall survival was analyzed, and the local tumor control rate was evaluated using magnetic resonance imaging. Perioperative clinical characteristics including Spine Oncology Study Group Outcomes Questionnaire, visual analog scale, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance score, and Karnofsky Performance Score were also investigated. The overall survival rate was 57.9% at 1 year, and the local tumor control rate was 81.1% after surgery. There was a statistically significant difference according to the type of the tumor in the survival analysis: the overall survival rates were 72.7% for favorable tumors and 48.6% for unfavorable tumors at 12 months after surgery (P = .04). Spine Oncology Study Group Outcomes Questionnaire, visual analog scale, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance score, and Karnofsky Performance Score was improved after surgery. All surgical methods, including TS, cervical pedicle screw, cervicothoracic junction fixation, thoracolumbar short fixation, and decompression surgery, showed good clinical and radiological outcomes. Optimized surgical methods show similarly good clinical outcomes in managing spinal metastasis as TS.

A retrospective controlled study of postoperative fever after posterior lumbar interbody fusion due to degenerative lumbar disease.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative fever is a common feature of spinal surgery. When fever occurs postoperatively in patients, surgeons are eager to rule out an infection. There are many reports about postoperative fever and infection; however, only a few have described the relationship between degenerative spinal disease and postoperative fever. This study aimed to investigate the causes of postoperative fever in patients with degenerative lumbar disease undergoing posterior screw fixation and interbody fusion and compare patients with non-pathologic fever and infected febrile patients. METHODS: From March 2015 to February 2016, 263 patients with degenerative lumbar disease underwent posterior lumbar screw fixation and interbody fusion surgery in our institution. We performed risk factor analysis by categorizing patients as afebrile and febrile. Comparisons were made between afebrile patients and patients with non-pathologic fever, and an analysis was performed between patients with non-pathologic fever and patients with febrile infection. We compared each group by examining the demographic factors before surgery, surgery features, drain duration, and postoperative transfusion. The postoperative day (POD) of fever onset, postoperative fever duration, and blood sample results in patients with fever were investigated. RESULTS: The drain duration was found to be an important factor between the afebrile febrile groups and between the non-pathologic fever and afebrile groups. POD of fever occurred earlier in the non-pathologic group than in the infection group (p = 0.04), and the duration of fever was shorter in the non-pathologic fever group than in the infection group (p = 0.01). Higher procalcitonin levels were observed at POD 5 in the infection group than in the non-pathologic fever group. (p < 0.01) The accidental dural rupture rate was higher in the infected group (p = 0.02); this was thought to be caused by the long non-ambulatory period after surgery. CONCLUSION: This study identified risk factors and differences between infectious diseases associated with postoperative fever. A significant risk factor for postoperative non-pathological fever was a shorter catheter drainage period. Fever after 3 days, fever for more than 4 days and higher procalcitonin levels after surgery suggest infection.

The Results of Interfacetal Fusion Using Local Bone Combined With an Atlantoaxial Instrumentation.

BACKGROUND: Many studies have described different C1-2 fusion techniques that have evolved over time. We introduced an easy and effective C1-2 fusion technique using local bone chips combined with atlantoaxial instrumentation. OBJECTIVE: To identify the efficacy of interfacetal fusion using local bone combined with atlantoaxial instrumentation by assessment of clinical outcomes and fusion rate. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the data from 25 patients who underwent atlantoaxial stabilization surgery using C1-2 pedicle screws and interfacetal bone fusion by a single surgeon between March 2012 and December 2019. RESULTS: The demographics were 15 men and 10 women with a mean age of 57.6 years (range, 27-85 years) at the time of surgery. Three patients underwent surgery for myelopathy due to os odontoideum, 9 for C1-2 instability, 9 for trauma, 3 for rheumatoid arthritis, and 1 for bony spur, C1-2. At 3 months postsurgery, 3 and 21 patients showed 2-point and 1-point improvements in the Nurick grade, respectively. There was no difference in the Nurick score in 1 patient. Seven patients had a computed tomography scan at 1 year after surgery, which revealed a bridging trabecular bone. No movement was observed in the x-ray flexion/extension view at 1 year after surgery in all patients. In addition, no patients complained of postoperative occipital neuralgia. CONCLUSION: This study showed that interfacetal fusion with C1-2 pedicle screws using the free-hand technique was efficient and simple.

Benefits and Pitfalls of O-Arm Navigation in Cervical Pedicle Screw.

BACKGROUND: Cervical pedicle screw (CPS) with O-arm-based intraoperative navigation has demonstrated satisfactory results in recent studies. In this article, we introduce our experience and discuss important considerations for CPS placement with O-arm navigation. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the data of 51 patients with 156 pedicle screws who underwent O-arm navigated CPS from July 2020 to October 2021. The accuracy of each screw placement was evaluated at the initial screw location using intraoperative 3D reconstructed O-arm images and the final screw location using postoperative computed tomography (CT). The screw accuracy was assessed in the axial image. RESULTS: The initial accuracy of screws on intraoperative 3D reconstructed O-arm images was 93.6% (146 of 156). The accuracies of the mid-cervical level (C3, C4, C5) were relatively low (83.3%-85.0%) compared with those of C2, C6, and C7 (93.3%-100.0%) at the initial screw due to the rotation of the vertebral body. Among 10 violated screws, 5 were converted to lateral mass screws or removed intraoperatively, and the other 5 were retained because the violations were minimal. After converting the screw, the final accuracy of the screws in postoperative CT was 96.7% (146 of 151). CONCLUSIONS: CPS with O-arm navigation showed relatively low accuracy at the mid-cervical level due to vertebral rotation. However, the opportunity to convert the screw from intraoperative 3D reconstructed O-arm images is the advantage of the O-arm navigation, and it showed excellent accuracy.

Treatment Outcome and Risk Factors Associated with Diffuse Axonal Injury in Patients with Moderate to Severe Head Injury.

AIM: To evaluate diffuse axonal injury (DAI) patients according to DAI stage to identify risk factors that may affect clinical outcome. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 992 traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients visited our hospital between 2011 and 2016. Thirtyseven patients diagnosed with DAI were enrolled in this study and stratified by DAI stage: Stage I, 20 patients (54.1%); Stage II, 4 patients (10.8%); and Stage III, 13 patients (35.1%). RESULTS: The mean age and the median follow-up period were 45.43 years and 13 months, respectively. Patient demographic data and clinical findings on admission showed no differences according to DAI stage, except for the revised trauma score (RTS) (p=0.026). In univariate analysis, stages I and II vs. III (p=0.001) and stages I vs. II and III (p=0.019), transfusion within 24 hours of visit (p=0.033), shock or cardiac arrest (p=0.006), traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage (T-SAH) (p=0.011), and subdural hematoma (SDH) (p=0.009) were significantly correlated with Glasgow outcome score (GOS). In multivariate analysis, DAI stage I and II vs. III (p=0.005) and SDH (p=0.040) were significant. CONCLUSION: Clinically, Stage II was more correlated with Stage I, rather than stage III. Stage III showed a much poorer outcome compared to stages I and II. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) should be promptly performed in all TBI patients when a patient?s level of consciousness and cranialcomputed tomography (CT) does not match, as there is a possibility of stage III DAI.

Posterior Thoracic Cage Interbody Fusion Offers Solid Bone Fusion with Sagittal Alignment Preservation for Decompression and Fusion Surgery in Lower Thoracic and Thoracolumbar Spine.

OBJECTIVE: It is challenging to make solid fusion by posterior screw fixation and laminectomy with posterolateral fusion (PLF) in thoracic and thoracolumbar (TL) diseases. In this study, we report our experience and follow-up results with a new surgical technique entitled posterior thoracic cage interbody fusion (PTCIF) for thoracic and TL spine in comparison with conventional PLF. METHODS: After institutional review board approval, a total of 57 patients who underwent PTCIF (n=30) and conventional PLF (n=27) for decompression and fusion in thoracic and TL spine between 2004 and 2019 were analyzed. Clinical outcomes and radiological parameters, including bone fusion, regional Cobb angle, and proximal junctional Cobb angle, were evaluated. RESULTS: In PTCIF and conventional PLF, the mean age was 61.2 and 58.2 years (p=0.46), and the numbers of levels fused were 2.8 and 3.1 (p=0.46), respectively. Every patient showed functional improvement except one case of PTCIF. Postoperative hematoma as a perioperative complication occurred in one and three cases, respectively. The mean difference in the regional Cobb angle immediately after surgery compared with that of the last follow-up was 1.4° in PTCIF and 7.6° in conventional PLF (p=0.003), respectively. The mean durations of postoperative follow-up were 35.6 months in PTCIF and 37.3 months in conventional PLF (p=0.86). CONCLUSION: PTCIF is an effective fusion method in decompression and fixation surgery with good clinical outcomes for various spinal diseases in the thoracic and TL spine. It provides more stable bone fusion than conventional PLF by anterior column support.

A Prognostic Factor for Prolonged Mechanical Ventilator-Dependent Respiratory Failure after Cervical Spinal Cord Injury : Maximal Canal Compromise on Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

OBJECTIVE: The period of mechanical ventilator (MV)-dependent respiratory failure after cervical spinal cord injury (CSCI) varies from patient to patient. This study aimed to identify predictors of MV at hospital discharge (MVDC) due to prolonged respiratory failure among patients with MV after CSCI. METHODS: Two hundred forty-three patients with CSCI were admitted to our institution between May 2006 and April 2018. Their medical records and radiographic data were retrospectively reviewed. Level and completeness of injury were defined according to the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) standards. Respiratory failure was defined as the requirement for definitive airway and assistance of MV. We also evaluated magnetic resonance imaging characteristics of the cervical spine. These characteristics included : maximum canal compromise (MCC); intramedullary hematoma or cord transection; and integrity of the disco-ligamentous complex for assessment of the Subaxial Cervical Spine Injury Classification (SLIC) scoring. The inclusion criteria were patients with CSCI who underwent decompression surgery within 48 hours after trauma with respiratory failure during hospital stay. Patients with Glasgow coma scale 12 or lower, major fatal trauma of vital organs, or stroke caused by vertebral artery injury were excluded from the study. RESULTS: Out of 243 patients with CSCI, 30 required MV during their hospital stay, and 27 met the inclusion criteria. Among them, 48.1% (13/27) of patients had MVDC with greater than 30 days MV or death caused by aspiration pneumonia. In total, 51.9% (14/27) of patients could be weaned from MV during 30 days or less of hospital stay (MV days : MVDC 38.23±20.79 vs. MV weaning, 13.57±8.40; p<0.001). Vital signs at hospital arrival, smoking, the American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, Associated injury with Injury Severity Score, SLIC score, and length of cord edema did not differ between the MVDC and MV weaning groups. The ASIA impairment scale, level of injury within C3 to C6, and MCC significantly affected MVDC. The MCC significantly correlated with MVDC, and the optimal cutoff value was 51.40%, with 76.9% sensitivity and 78.6% specificity. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, MCC >51.4% was a significant risk factor for MVDC (odds ratio, 7.574; p=0.039). CONCLUSION: As a method of predicting which patients would be able to undergo weaning from MV early, the MCC is a valid factor. If the MCC exceeds 51.4%, prognosis of respiratory function becomes poor and the probability of MVDC is increased.

Microsurgery Versus Endovascular Treatment - Which Is Adequate for Initial Treatment of Spinal Dural Arteriovenous Fistula: A Case Series.

OBJECTIVE: Considering the adverse natural history of spinal dural arteriovenous fistula (sDAVF), clinical outcomes may be worsened if the initial occlusive trial does not achieve complete fistula occlusion. We aimed to analyze the initial success rate of microsurgery and embolization and confirm the effects of initial treatment success on the clinical outcomes of sDAVF patients. In addition, we investigated the factors associated with initial treatment failure. METHODS: A total of 38 patients treated for sDAVF at a single institution over a 14-year period were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical outcomes according to the initial treatment modality were quantitatively analyzed. Demographic characteristics and angioarchitecture data were evaluated to identify factors associated with initial treatment failure. RESULTS: In the study population, 34 patients underwent embolization as the initial treatment, and complete occlusion of the fistula was achieved in 13 patients (38%). However, all patients who underwent microsurgery showed complete fistula occlusion. Among patients with initial treatment success, gait and micturition were improved with statistical significance (p < 0.001 each). However, in cases of initial treatment failure, only mild improvements in gait and micturition were observed, which were not statistically significant (p = 0.097 and p = 0.375, respectively). A narrow feeding artery diameter (p = 0.007) and embolization of the artery only (p = 0.002) were identified as factors associated with initial treatment failure. CONCLUSION: To achieve symptomatic improvement and prevent neurological deterioration due to recurrence, the initial definite occlusion of the fistula is important. Despite advances in endovascular techniques, microsurgical occlusion is still superior in terms of initial complete obliteration.

Comparison between Anterior Cervical Decompression with Fusion and Posterior Cervical Fusion with Wide Facetectomy for Treatment of Severe Bony Foraminal Stenosis.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) and posterior cervical fusion (PCF) with wide facetectomy in the treatment of parallel-shaped bony foraminal stenosis (FS). METHODS: Thirty-six patients underwent surgery due to one-or-two levels of parallel-shaped cervical FS. ACDF was performed in 16 patients, and PCF using CPS was performed in 20 patients. All patients were followed up at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Standardized outcome measures such as Numeric rating scale (NRS) score for arm/neck pain and Neck disability index (NDI) were evaluated. Cervical radiographs were used to compare the C2-7 Cobb's angle, segmental angle, and fusion rates. RESULTS: There was an improvement in NRS scores after both approaches for radicular arm pain (mean change -6.78 vs. -8.14, p=0.012), neck pain (mean change -1.67 vs. -4.36, p=0.038), and NDI score (-19.69 vs. -18.15, p=0.794). The segmental angle improvement was greater in the ACDF group than in the posterior group (9.4°±2.7° vs. 3.3°±5.1°, p=0.004). However, there was no significant difference in C2-7 Cobb angle between groups (16.2°±7.9° vs. 14.8°±8.5°, p=0.142). As a complication, dysphagia was observed in one case of the ACDF group. CONCLUSION: In the treatment of parallel-shaped bony FS up to two surgical levels, segmental angle improvement was more favorable in patients who underwent ACDF. However, PCF with wide facetectomy using CPS should be considered as an alternative treatment option in cases where the anterior approach is burdensome.

Risk Factors for High-Grade Meningioma in Brain and Spine: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Histologic grade has important implications for the management in meningioma. It is important to understand the risk of high-grade meningioma (grades II and III). In this article, we systematically reviewed the histologic grade of meningioma depending on the location and sex and its relationship with recurrence. METHODS: The PubMed and Embase databases were systematically searched until February 4, 2020. We included studies that were not restricted to specific anatomic locations, histologic grade, or the sizes of the tumors. The proportion of high-grade meningiomas depending on the location and sex and the odds ratio (OR) of recurrence were pooled using a random-effects model. RESULTS: Outcome data were analyzed for 20,336 tumors from 34 studies. We found different proportions of high-grade meningiomas in the brain (12.8%) (95% confidence interval [CI], 10.5%-15.1%) versus the spine (2.4%) (95% CI, 1.0%-3.7%) (P < 0.01). Skull base meningiomas (8.7%) (95% CI, 5.8%-11.6%) had a lower proportion of high-grade meningiomas than non-skull base meningiomas (16.5%) (95% CI, 11.9%-21.1%) (P < 0.01). In addition, high-grade meningiomas were more likely to occur in male patients (18.0%) (95% CI, 10.1%-25.9%) than female patients (7.0%) (95% CI, 3.5%-10.6%) (P = 0.01). Higher rates of recurrence (OR = 13.83) were confirmed for high-grade meningiomas than grade I meningiomas (95% CI, 4.10-46.65) (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis found that intracranial, nonskull base, and male sex are risk factors for high-grade meningioma, and high-grade meningioma had a much higher recurrence rate as compared with grade I meningioma.