Population pharmacokinetic analysis to identify the possibility of interaction between anti-cancer agents.

BACKGROUND: A number of molecularly targeted agents in oncology are tested in clinical studies in combination with conventional chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy. There is the possibility that the pharmacokinetics and dynamics of these targeted agents may be different when administered alone as against when administered in combination with other agents. AIM: The aim of this study is to understand the effects of addition of combination agents on the pharmacokinetics of a new, investigational, cyclin dependent kinase inhibitor anti-cancer drug (Compound A) using population pharmacokinetic (pop-PK) analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Integrated pop-PK analysis of data obtained from multiple phase I/II studies of Compound A, given alone or in combination with other agents. RESULTS: A two compartmental model was found suitable to explain the pharmacokinetics of Compound A. No statistically significant influence of patient covariates or combination agents on the pharmacokinetic parameters of the central compartment was detected up to a significance level of 0.01. Model evaluation showed that the parameter estimates are stable and that the variability in the data was well reproduced by the model. CONCLUSIONS: This study represents the first time that a pop-PK analysis was performed in India for a targeted anti-cancer agent being developed in India. Such an analysis is useful to not only understand the influence of patient covariates and combination agents on the pharmacokinetics of a new investigational agent, but would also be valuable in the simulation of later phase clinical trials for the agent under development.

The use of modeling and simulation to guide clinical development of olmesartan medoxomil in pediatric subjects.

Modeling and simulation were used extensively in the development of an indication for the use of olmesartan medoxomil in pediatric patients with hypertension. Simulations based on models developed in adult patients indicated that two dose groups were sufficient to estimate a dose-response relationship, thereby reducing by one-third the number of subjects required for the phase III pediatric study. Model-based predictions for blood pressure reduction agreed with the observed results of the subsequent phase III study, showing statistically significant dose-response relationships with respect to both systolic and diastolic blood pressure. Previously established pharmacokinetic and exposure-response relationships in adults, adjusted for the influence of body weight on clearance (wt(0.80)), were confirmed in the pediatric population. Together, these findings support an olmesartan dosing recommendation in pediatric subjects aged 6 to 16 years of 10 mg for subjects weighing <35 kg and 20 mg for those weighing ≥35 kg.

Predictive population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model for a novel COX-2 inhibitor.

The objectives of these analyses were to (1) develop a population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model for a novel COX-2 inhibitor (CS-706) using data from primarily Caucasian subjects, (2) predict responses in subpopulations of interest (including Japanese subjects), and (3) correlate pharmacodynamic parameters to safety outcomes. The model was developed using data from 130 healthy adults following single or multiple doses of CS-706. Serial plasma concentrations of CS-706 and ex vivo whole-blood cyclooxygenase-1 (COX-1) and COX-2 activity were determined up to 72 hours postdose. An E(max) model described relationships between CS-706 plasma concentrations and COX-1 and COX-2 inhibition. CS-706 potency (EC(50)) was 397 ng/mL for COX-1 and 20 ng/mL for COX-2. None of the tested covariates influenced the pharmacodynamics of CS-706. Japanese subjects are expected to show a slightly reduced response to CS-706, consistent with lower exposure following the same dose given to Caucasian subjects. Predictive pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modeling for COX-1 and COX-2 inhibition indicates a 20-fold potency ratio that is expected to be similar in Japanese and Caucasians. There was good correlation between COX-1 inhibition and the incidence of 7-day gastroduodenal mucosal injury. A dose of less than 25 mg bid could be adequate to inhibit COX-2 activity with a low risk of gastrointestinal mucosal injury.

Development of a predictive pharmacokinetic model for a novel cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor.

A predictive population pharmacokinetic model was developed for a novel cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitor CS-706, using data from 130 subjects in 3 phase 1 trials after single or multiple doses of CS-706 (2- to 800-mg doses daily, up to 14 days) and validated using sparse data from a separate study. A 2-compartment model described the data. Typical apparent clearance (CL/F) was 47.2 L/h and was reduced by 43% at doses greater than 200 mg. Apparent clearance was decreased by 38% in female subjects and by 64% and 15%, respectively, in poor/intermediate CYP 2D6 and poor CYP 2C9 metabolizers. Typical apparent volume of the central compartment was 166 L and increased with body weight. Bioavailability increased by 42% after nighttime doses and decreased saturably with increasing dose (50% reduction at 221 mg). Predicted exposures in Japanese subjects were reduced relative to whites because of a lower frequency of poor metabolizers. The model may aid in optimizing the design of future studies and predicting exposures in other subpopulations.

Effect of a very late antigen-4 receptor antagonist on allergen-induced airway responses and inflammation in asthma.

BACKGROUND: Very late antigen-4 (VLA(4)) plays a key role in the recruitment of eosinophils in allergic responses in animal studies. OBJECTIVE: We investigated whether pretreatment with multiple doses of a VLA(4) receptor antagonist, HMR 1031, protects against allergen-induced airway responses and airway inflammation in humans. METHODS: Fourteen asthmatics (7F/7M), 18-49 years, PC(20) forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1)) methacholine (M) (<8 mg/mL; FEV(1) 82.3-116.1% predicted) with dual responses to inhaled allergen participated in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over study. Each treatment period consisted of 9 days, separated by >or=2 weeks. Exhaled nitric oxide (eNO), PC(20)FEV(1)(M) and hypertonic saline-induced sputum was obtained on Days 1, 7 and 9. Subjects inhaled HMR 1031 (20 mg b.i.d.) or placebo (P) on Days 1--8. On Day 8, an allergen bronchoprovocation test was performed, the airway response was measured by FEV(1), and expressed as %fall from baseline. Data from 12 evaluable subjects are presented here. RESULTS: Both treatments were well tolerated. There was no significant difference between HMR 1031 and P in the early asthamatic response: mean AUC (0-3 h)+/-SEM (%fall h): 26.01+/-4.26 and 17.41+/-4.26, respectively (P=0.18), nor in the late response: mean AUC (3-9 h)+/-SEM (%fall h): 97.09+/-8.63 and 97.61+/-8.63, respectively, P=0.97. This corresponded to the absence of significant allergen-induced changes in PC(20)FEV(1)(M), eNO, sputum eosinophils and soluble inflammation markers between both treatment periods. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with multiple inhaled doses of the VLA(4) antagonist, HMR 1031, did not result in detectable protection against allergen-induced airway responses or airway inflammation in asthma.

Critical period for a teratogenic VLA-4 antagonist: Developmental effects and comparison of embryo drug concentrations of teratogenic and non-teratogenic VLA-4 antagonists.

BACKGROUND: Integrins such as VLA-4 (Very late antigen 4, integrin alpha4beta1) play key roles in cell-cell interactions that are critical for development. Homozygous null knockouts of the VLA-4 alpha4-subunit or VCAM-1 (VLA-4 cell surface ligand) in mice result in failure of the allantois and chorion to fuse leading to interrupted placentation and cardiac development and embryo lethality. Embryo-fetal studies of three VLA-4 antagonists, IVL745, IVL984, and HMR1031 [Crofts et al., Birth Defects Res B 71:55-68 (this issue), 2004] with exposure on gestation days (GD) 6-17 (rat), 6-18 (rabbit) or 6-15 (mouse) showed that only IVL984 treatment resulted in embryo lethality and cardiac defects. Objectives of the current study were to determine the critical period for inducing IVL984-related embryo-fetal effects, and to test the hypothesis that these effects were due to higher embryo drug concentrations. METHODS: IVL984 was administered at 40 mg/kg/day to pregnant rats on GD 4 and 5, GD 6 and 7, GD 8 and 9, GD 10 and 11, or GD 12 and 13. Animals were euthanized on GD 21 and uteri and fetuses were examined. A treatment period of GD 10-12 was selected for subsequent toxicokinetic (TK) studies in which IVL984, HMR1031, or IVL745 was administered to pregnant rats and rabbits. On GD 12, maternal plasma, extra-embryonic tissue (placenta and amniotic fluid), and embryonic tissue were collected and analyzed for drug concentrations. RESULTS: In the IVL984 critical period study in pregnant rats, treatment on GD 10 and 11 resulted in increased post-implantation loss, skeletal variations, and spiral septal defects similar to those observed in standard embryo-fetal development studies with treatment throughout organogenesis. There were no embryo-fetal effects after treatment on GD 4 and 5, GD 6 and 7, or GD 8 and 9. There was a single aorta malformation after treatment on GD 12 and 13. In the TK studies, IVL745, HMR1031, and IVL984 were all detectable in embryonic tissue and there was no evidence for accumulation. Rat and rabbit embryo exposures (AUC or dose-adjusted AUC) on GD 12 could not explain the observed teratology (IVL984

Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of ciclesonide.

Ciclesonide is a novel glucocorticoid that is converted into ciclesonide--active principle (CIC-AP) in the lung. The study objectives were to identify a structural model for population pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis of CIC-AP using nonlinear mixed-effects modeling, assess the influence of select covariates on PK and/or pharmacodynamic (PD) parameters, and investigate the effects of CIC-AP on endogenous cortisol. Pooled concentration data from nine phase I studies (dose: 400-3600 micrograms) involving healthy and asthmatic patients were included in the PK analysis. There were 151 subjects (3300 observations) for the CIC-AP population PK analysis. Various models examined inter- and intrasubject variability for the PK parameters. Population estimates of the PK parameters of clearance and volume of distribution were 396 L/h (64.8% co-efficient of variation [CV]) and 1190 L (41.2% CV), respectively. Pharmacodynamic population estimates included maximum cortisol release rate, 3140 ng/h (5.4% CV). The EC50 of CIC-AP was 0.88 ng/mL. Ciclesonide is a safe corticosteroid that causes negligible cortisol suppression. The disposition and effect of CIC-AP can be described using mixed-effect modeling. The estimated EC50 is similar to mean Cmax from an 800-micrograms dose, further suggesting CIC-AP has little effect on cortisol suppression.

Deposition and pharmacokinetics of an HFA formulation of triamcinolone acetonide delivered by pressurized metered dose inhaler.

Novel formulations of asthma drugs contained in pressurized metered dose inhalers (pMDIs) are being developed containing hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) propellants. The objectives of this study were to assess the deposition in the lungs and oropharynx of triamcinolone acetonide (TAA; Azmacort, Aventis Pharma, Collegeville, PA) delivered by pMDI formulated with HFA-134a, together with the pharmacokinetic profile of TAA, and to determine the extent to which the Azmacort spacer improves targeting of TAA to the lungs. The deposition of TAA, labelled with 99mTc, was assessed by gamma scintigraphy in 10 patients with mild to moderate asthma (mean forced expiratory volume in one second [FEV1] 76% predicted), who received in randomized order three delivered (ex-device) doses of 75 microg TAA via pMDI coupled to an Azmacort spacer (TAA-spacer), and three delivered doses of 230 microg TAA via the same device, but with the spacer removed (TAA-no spacer). Mean lung deposition expressed as mass of drug was similar for each regimen (TAA-no spacer 175 microg; TAA-spacer 188 microg), but when expressed as percentage delivered dose, lung deposition was higher for TAA-spacer (53.8%) versus TAA-no spacer (26.0%), indicating superior drug targeting for TAA-spacer. The spacer reduced oropharyngeal deposition. The pharmacokinetic data showed higher plasma levels of drug for TAA-no spacer, resulting from higher oropharyngeal deposition. "Pharmacoscintigraphic" data showed proof of concept for a novel HFA delivery system for an inhaled corticosteroid based on pulmonary targeting of drug.

Effect of age and gender on the pharmacokinetics of ebastine after single and repeated dosing in healthy subjects.

OBJECTIVES: Ebastine is a potent and selective H1-receptor antagonist indicated for allergic rhinitis which undergoes extensive first pass metabolism by CYP3A4 to form an active metabolite, carebastine. The purpose of the study was to determine age- and gender-related differences in the pharmacokinetics of ebastine and carebastine. METHODS: The upper recommended oral dose of 20 mg once daily was administered to 12 healthy young (22 to 38 years) and 12 healthy elderly (50 to 92 years; 8 m and 4 f) subjects for 5 days. Plasma concentrations of ebastine and carebastine were determined for 24 hours following the initial dose on Day 1 and for 72 hours following the dose on Day 5 using a sensitive LC/MS/MS assay. The minimum quantifiable limit (MQL) for the assay was 0.05 ng/ml and 1.0 ng/ml for ebastine and carebastine, respectively. RESULTS: Mean area under the curve and Cmax values on Day 1 and Day 5 were similar for ebastine but approximately doubled for carebastine due to its longer half-life. Mean carebastine concentrations were approximately 10 to 20 fold higher than mean ebastine concentrations. For young subjects, the mean (%CV) ebastine t(1/2) was 5.76 (28.47) h and 20.38 (46.19) h on Day 1 and Day 5, respectively. Similarily, for young subjects, the mean (%CV) for carebastine t(1/2) was 7.03 (23.21) h and 26.12 (23.39) h on Day 1 and Day 5, respectively. This apparent prolongation of t(1/2) was probably due to lack of proper estimation of terminal half-life on Day 1 as fewer samples were collected for a shorter duration on Day 1. Using a multicomparison test for Cmin values, it was determined that steady state conditions were achieved by Day 5 for both age groups for ebastine and in young subjects for carebastine. The variability in ebastine pharmacokinetic parameters was higher than carebastine. A 50% increase in ebastine AUC(0-24) and Cmax values in elderly subjects, with no changes in t(1/2), could be explained by either increased absorption of ebastine in elderly subjects or due to a decrease in first pass metabolism. As ebastine shows a high first-pass effect, even a small change in this first pass can cause large changes in plasma exposure. The ebastine pharmacokinetic parameters for elderly subjects in this study lie between the values reported in young subjects in earlier studies. Hence, the apparent age-related pharmacokinetic difference for ebastine is probably due to the inherent variability in ebastine pharmacokinetics. There were no gender-related differences in either young or elderly subjects for mean AUC, Cmax, tmax and t(1/2) ebastine and carebastine values. Ebastine was absorbed rapidly with a median tmax of 1.25 to 2.25 h for both healthy young and elderly males and females on Day 1 and Day 5. There was a delayed appearance of carebastine as expressed by median tmax of 4.0 to 5.0 h, which did not change with age, gender or repeated administration. There were no clinically relevant differences between the groups of subjects with respect to adverse events or safety parameters. CONCLUSIONS: Thus, ebastine can be safely administered to elderly subjects with no clinically important age- or gender related differences in the pharmacokinetics of ebastine/carebastine.

Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling of the antilipolytic effects of an adenosine receptor agonist in healthy volunteers.

ARA is an adenosine receptor agonist with high affinity for A1 and A2 receptors, which are involved in regulation of free fatty acid (FFA) production. Two parallel groups of 13 healthy males were enrolled in a Phase I study to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of this compound and to characterize its effect on plasma FFA concentrations following administration of a single 6-hour intravenous infusion of ARA or placebo. ARA plasma concentrations were measured by a validated high-performance liquid chromatographic method (fluorescence detection). ARA is a highly cleared compound (Cl: 0.79 L/h/kg) with a modest volume of distribution (Vss: 0.91 L/kg) and short half-life (t1/2: approximately 1 hour). The mean percent change in plasma FFA concentrations relative to placebo was best described by an Emax-based tolerance model, in which a hypothetical metabolite/antagonist was used to describe the apparent development of tolerance to the suppressive effects of ARA on FFA levels. The EC50 values (%RSE of estimate) for ARA and the hypothetical antagonist were 17.0 (5.4) and 15.6 (12.8) ng/mL, respectively. The use of adenosine A1 agonists as antilipolytic drugs may be restricted due to the potential development of tolerance, and thus a period of abstinence from the agonist may be required before the response of FFA returns to pretolerant conditions. In the case of ARA, the value of 0.33 h-1 for Kant0 indicates that a period of approximately 11 hours should suffice. In agreement with preclinical data previously reported in literature, the present study provides evidence that desensitization of adenosine receptor-mediated inhibition of lipolysis may occur in humans. In conclusion, the ability of ARA to reduce circulating levels of FFA can be related to plasma ARA concentrations using a modified Emax-based tolerance model.

In vitro and in vivo techniques used in drug development for evaluation of dose delivery of inhaled corticosteroids.

Oral inhaled corticosteroids are important in the treatment of asthma since their delivery is targeted directly to the lung, which is the site of action. Triamcinolone acetonide (TAA) is an effective and safe corticosteroid that is marketed as a metered-dose inhaler (MDI) with an integrated spacer (Azmacort) for the treatment of asthma. Due to the phasing out of chlorofluorocarbon (CFC) propellants, Azmacort has been reformulated with a non-CFC propellant. Due to the complexities of oral inhaled formulations and the topical nature of drug delivery to the lung for efficacy, the reformulation of oral inhaled MDIs requires careful consideration and support throughout their development, using a combination of in vitro and in vivo studies to ensure clinical comparability for both efficacy and safety. This paper describes a chronological series of studies designed to support the reformulation of Azmacort. These included in vitro studies to estimate respirable fraction, in vivo pulmonary deposition studies, in vivo pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic studies to estimate the systemic effects of each formulation, and final clinical studies in adult and pediatric patients to confirm the clinical comparability of the new formulation of Azmacort. The results of these studies, performed at various stages during the development of new formulations, were critical in guiding the reformulation efforts for Azmacort.

Effect of food and gender on the pharmacokinetics of RP 73401, a phosphodiesterase IV inhibitor.

OBJECTIVE: Early exploratory clinical pharmacokinetic studies can provide valuable information for the design and control of subsequent phase 2 studies. This philosophy was instituted for the compound RP 73401, a specific phosphodiesterase IV inhibitor, that was being developed simultaneously for delivery by both oral and pulmonary routes of administration. The objective of these studies was to separately evaluate the effect of food and gender on the pharmacokinetics of RP 73401 using small-scale focused pilot studies. METHODS: In the first study, 400 mcg of inhaled RP 73401 were administered to male and female healthy volunteers (n = 8 f, 8 m. In the second study, 400 mcg oral RP 73401 were administered to healthy male volunteers (n = 8) in the fed and fasted state in a crossover fashion. Serial plasma samples were collected for 24 hours and analyzed for RP 73401 using an HPLC method with post-column photochemical reaction and fluorescence detection that had a minimum quantifiable limit of 10 pg/ml. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using non-compartmental techniques. RESULTS: Comparison of male and female pharmacokinetics following inhalation administration showed no statistically significant differences in the absorption and disposition of RP 73401 with respect to AUC, Cmax, tmax, and t1,2 values. Conversely, RP 73401 administered subsequently to a high fat meal showed a 51% reduction in Cmax and a 5-fold prolongation in tmax as compared to the fasted state. However, there was no statistically significant difference in the systemic availability of RP 73401 as assessed through AUC0-infinity comparisons. CONCLUSIONS: These results successfully allowed the uncomplicated inclusion of females in oral and inhalation studies with RP 73401 and indicated the need to address oral drug dosing conditions in order to minimize sources of pharmacokinetic variability in subsequent phase 2 studies.

Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety of inhaled cyclosporin A (ADI628) after single and repeated administration in healthy male and female subjects and asthmatic patients.

Severe asthmatics treated with oral/inhaled corticosteroids are at risk of side effects (adrenal suppression). Oral cyclosporin A has been effective in asthma treatment, and nebulized cyclosporin A has been administered for approximately 6 months with no nephrotoxicity or hepatotoxicity, suggesting a wider therapeutic margin for an inhaled cyclosporin A for treatment of asthma. Single- and repeated-dose studies in healthy and asthmatic male and female subjects were conducted to determine the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety of a new formulation of inhaled cyclosporin A (ADI628) metered-dose inhaler (MDI). ADI628 had roughly dose-linear increases in blood concentrations with moderate variability after single and multiple administration in healthy subjects. Steady-state ADI628 concentrations reflected an effective half-life of 7.0 to 12.5 hours. No overt gender-related differences were observed after single inhaled 10 mg ADI628 dose. However, asthmatics and females (20 mg dose group) had lower ADI628 concentrations as compared to healthy males, probably due to lower inspiratory flow rates and probably not due to disease- or gender-related differences in metabolism/elimination of ADI628. Renal excretion was a minor route of elimination for ADI628 with no dose- or gender-related differences. The blood ADI628 exposure in humans was 1/3- to 1/6-fold lower than the no-effect dose in dogs. Also, the blood ADI628 exposure after the highest inhaled dose was much lower than after the administration of the efficacious oral cyclosporin A dose (3 mg/kg) for treating asthma. The highest steady-state dose (10 mg bid) resulted in ADI628 concentrations that are not typically associated with systemic nephrotoxicity or immunosuppression. Furthermore, repeated inhaled doses of ADI628 were safe and generally well tolerated with no apparent systemic immunosuppressive activity in healthy and asthmatic subjects.

Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety of a platelet GPIIb/IIIa antagonist, RGD891, following intravenous administration in healthy male volunteers.

The pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), and safety of a platelet GPIIb/IIIa receptor antagonist, RGD891, and its active metabolite, RGD039, were evaluated after administration of various intravenous regimens of RGD891 to healthy male volunteers in two Phase I studies. Plasma and urine concentrations of RGD891 and RGD039 were measured by validated LC/MS/MS methods with minimum quantifiable limit (MQL) of 1 ng/mL and 10 ng/mL, respectively. PD activity was assessed by percent inhibition of ADP (20 microM)-induced platelet aggregation. Following intravenous dosing, the RGD891 was the predominant compound in plasma. The PK of RGD891 was dose independent associated with modest between-subject variability. RGD891 was rapidly cleared (Cl, 11.2-15.5 L/h), exhibited a restricted distribution (Vss, 23.0-25.9 L) and a short terminal t1/2 lambda z (1.2-2.1 h). Plasma concentrations of the metabolite (RGD039) increased with dose but were variable. RGD039 had longer t1/2 lambda z of 4.5 to 6.6 hours. Renal excretion of unchanged drug played an important role in the elimination of the parent compound. Both RGD891 and RGD039 exhibited renal clearance values that were comparable to the glomerular filtration rate. Intravenous administration of RGD891 effectively inhibited platelet aggregation in a dose-dependent and reversible manner. At the highest dose (60 micrograms/kg bolus dose + 336 micrograms/kg 8-h infusion) > 90% inhibition of platelet aggregation was achieved. PD activity was primarily attributed to the parent compound. Inhibition of platelet aggregation was dependent on the anticoagulant present, with samples containing PPACK showing 20% to 30% lower activity as compared to citrate. RGD891 was safe and well tolerated across the various regimens studies.

Pharmacokinetics and concentration-effect analysis of intravenous RGD891, a platelet GPIIb/IIIa antagonist, using mixed-effects modeling (NONMEM).

UNLABELLED: RGD891 is a platelet GPIIb/IIIa receptor antagonist and potent inhibitor of platelet aggregation. This compound is biotransformed in vivo to RGD039, which also exhibits high affinity for the GPIIb/IIIa receptor. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modeling was employed to describe the concentration-effect relationship of both compounds following the intravenous administration of RGD891 to healthy volunteers. The overall objectives of this work were to support the dose selection process for future intravenous RGD891 safety and efficacy studies. Various intravenous regimens of RGD891 were administered to healthy volunteers enrolled in three Phase I studies. Frequent plasma samples were collected at regular intervals for later measurement of RGD891 and RGD039 concentrations (validated LC/MS/MS methods). The pharmacokinetics of RGD891 and RGD039 were simultaneously analyzed by nonlinear mixed-effect modeling (NONMEM). Pharmacodynamic activity was assessed in all three studies by the degree to which ADP (20 microM)-induced platelet aggregation was inhibited. Population parameters describing the concentration-effect relationship of RGD891 and RGD039 were then generated using a modified competitive Emax-based model. RESULTS: Parent compound is by far the predominant active compound circulating in the plasma following intravenous administration of RGD891. The plasma RGD891 concentration-time data were best fit by a two-compartment structural model. The fit of the basic model was improved when total body weight was introduced as a covariate for RGD891 distribution. Between-subject variability in the RGD891 pharmacokinetic parameters--V1, K10, and K21--was less than 17% (coefficient of variation). Formation of the active metabolite (RGD039; Km) and its elimination (Kem) were assumed to be first-order processes (i.e., one-compartment model). The population pharmacokinetic model could only provide a rough estimate of the plasma concentration-time profile for RGD039 after administration of a given intravenous dosage regimen of RGD891 since metabolite concentrations were relatively low and highly variable. The first-order rate constant describing the formation of RGD039 from RGD891 (Km) was also associated with a substantial degree of between-subject variability (44.9%). The potency of RGD891 toward the inhibition of ADP-induced platelet aggregation was described by the population IC50 value (plasma concentration yielding 50% of maximal inhibition), which ranged from 58.0 to 95.4 ng/mL, depending on the pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) model and the data set used. The relatively low concentrations of the active metabolite achieved following intravenous administration of RGD891 did not permit independent estimation of a population IC50 value for RGD039. Therefore, its potency was fixed at 2.2-fold greater than that of the parent compound (based on previous PK-PD analyses). Intersubject variability in the IC50 values was 30%. CONCLUSIONS: Antagonism of the platelet IIb/IIIa receptors by intravenously administered RGD891 was effective in inhibiting ADP-induced platelet aggregation in a reversible and dose-dependent manner. Pharmacodynamic activity was largely attributed to the parent compound and less to the active metabolite based on the relative potencies of both compounds and the plasma concentrations of each achieved following intravenous administration. Intravenous bolus plus maintenance infusion regimens resulted in rapid attainment of steady-state plasma RGD891 concentrations. This combination regimen also provided for a marked and sustained inhibition of platelet aggregation that reached 90% or greater (relative to baseline values) in the higher dose groups. The modified Emax model adequately described inhibition of platelet aggregation following a particular intravenous dosage regimen of RGD891 (within the range of doses administered in the present studies). (ABSTRACT TRUNCATED)

Pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics in drug development: an industrial perspective.

In a health care environment dominated by the growth of managed care organizations, generic competition, therapeutic substitution and drug utilization review, drug development is an extremely risky proposition. Consequently, it is imperative to incorporate a mechanistic approach to drug development that combines a thorough understanding of a drug at the molecular/cellular level with a rigorous preclinical, and clinical pharmacology program. This should enable the sponsor to evaluate multiple hypotheses during the early "learning" phases of clinical development (Phases I and IIA) and to eliminate nonpromising candidates early on while drug development costs are low. Clinical research done properly in the early stages of drug development will also set the stage for designing and conducting optimal "confirming" registrational Phase IIB/III studies for promising drug candidates. Pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) modeling and simulation are crucial components of a mechanistic approach to optimal drug development and their application has significant impact in both early and late development efforts. This communication describes several applications of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics modeling and simulation that were important in guiding, optimizing and ensuring the success of development efforts for drug candidates in the therapeutic areas of cardiology and oncology. These examples are used to illustrate and discuss the use of the current state-of-the-art in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics modeling and simulation at numerous stages in the development cycle and to postulate on future directions in this area.

Absolute oral versus inhaled bioavailability: significance for inhaled drugs with special reference to inhaled glucocorticoids.

Orally inhaled drugs provide great benefit in the treatment of asthma as they are delivered directly to the site of action, i.e. the lung. The absolute oral inhaled bioavailability of a glucocorticoid results from the combination of the bioavailability of the dose delivered to the lung and the bioavailability of the dose delivered into the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. The majority of the dose delivered to the lung is absorbed and available systemically. For the portion of the glucocorticoid dose delivered orally, bioavailability depends upon absorption from the GI tract and the extent of first pass/pre-systemic metabolism in the GI tissue and liver. Since this oral component of the delivered dose does not provide any beneficial therapeutic effect but can contribute to the systemic side effects, it is desirable for the absolute oral bioavailability of inhaled glucocorticoids to be relatively low (which is the case with most of the glucocorticoids, < 25%). Another approach to limiting systemic exposure from inhaled delivery is to improve the effectiveness of the oral inhaled formulation and delivery device, by increasing the fraction of the total inhaled dose which reaches the lung. Since current inhalation technology can provide respirable fractions in the range of 30-50%, what is the significance of the oral component of systemic exposure in relation to the overall systemic exposure following the oral inhalation administration of glucocorticoids? Below a certain point (approximately 25%), lower oral bioavailability of inhaled drugs may not be clinically important with respect to systemic exposure if the lung targeting is good (30%).

Pharmacokinetic evaluation of a selegiline pulsatile oral delivery system.

Selegiline is a selective, irreversible inhibitor of MAO-B, used in the treatment of Parkinson's disease, either alone or as an adjunct to L-DOPA. The sole recommended dosing regimen is 5 mg given in the morning and at noon with breakfast and lunch. A pulsatile oral dosage form was developed to mimic the conventional tablet release from two oral administrations separated by 4 h, to permit once-daily dosing and increase compliance. The pharmacokinetics of the pulsatile delivery system was studied in six healthy male volunteers. The plasma concentration-time profile from the pulsatile system of selegiline and metabolites is dissimilar to that obtained from the 5 mg bid administration of the conventional tablet and cannot be considered to be bioequivalent. The initial pulse of the delivery system is rapidly absorbed but to a lesser extent than the conventional regimen; the second pulse exhibits absorption which is delayed and prolonged. The decrease in the selegiline concentration may be due to the less absorptive surface of the lower GI tract which is available to the second pulse. Another reason could be the disparity between the in vitro and in vivo release profiles from the second pulse. Compartmental analysis indicates that the ratio of formation-absorption rate constant for the selegiline to N-desmethylselegiline pathway decreases from 1.57 +/- 1.04 for the first pulse to 0.61 +/- 0.54 for the second pulse of the pulsatile delivery system, suggesting that the upper portion of the GI tract has a greater capacity to convert selegiline to N-desmethylselegiline than the lower GI tract. The lack of in vivo and in vitro correlation is most likely due to site specific absorption/metabolism. Regimen has been previously shown to be a significant factor in estimating the extent of selegiline and metabolite exposure following oral administration. The inequivalence of dosing regimens of the same total daily dose may ultimately be linked to the saturability of gut wall metabolism. This phenomenon may preclude the development of novel delivery systems designed to mimic the recommended dosing regimen of the conventional Eldepryl tablet.

Integrated pharmacokinetic and metabolic modeling of selegiline and metabolites after transdermal administration.

Selegiline (SEL) is a selective, irreversible inhibitor of MAO-B, used in the treatment of Parkinson's disease, either alone or as an adjunct to L-DOPA. Selegiline hydrochloride (HCl) undergoes significant first-pass metabolism following oral administration. Transdermal delivery avoids the first-pass effect and provides greater and more prolonged levels of unchanged SEL and reduced levels of metabolites (N-desmethylselegiline (DES), L-amphetamine (AMP), and L-methamphetamine (MET) compared to the oral regimen. An integrated pharmacokinetic-metabolic model which predicts plasma concentrations of SEL and metabolites following a single 24 h application of a selegiline transdermal system (STS) is proposed. The model is based on the metabolic conversion of SEL to DES and MET and subsequently to AMP. The input function is described by a zero-order constant for the delivery of SEL from the STS system based on in vitro studies of penetration of SEL across human skin. The elimination-non-metabolic constants for each analyte account for the urinary elimination. Plasma concentration data from a pilot pharmacokinetic study in which six healthy male volunteers were administered single 24 h applications of a 1.8 mg cm2, 10 cm2 STS were used to examine this model. The coefficient of determination was 0.98 and model selection criterion was 3.4 for mean data fits, supporting the goodness of fit of the model. The pharmacokinetic parameters obtained by non-compartmental analysis were comparable to those predicted by a compartmental model. The model also predicted urinary recoveries for AMP and MET and negligible recovery for SEL and DES consistent with recent studies with the STS in which urine was collected. The metabolic conversion constant from SEL to DES was significantly lower than the conversion constant from SEL to MET, indicating that metabolism of SEL is primarily driven towards MET following transdermal administration. The metabolic conversion from MET to AMP was less than the conversion from DES to AMP. This simultaneous prediction of the SEL and metabolites is essential as the metabolic ratios have been linked to the neuroprotective effects of SEL. These findings support the proposed regional delivery advantage attributed to the transdermal route compared to the conventional therapy with the oral tablet. Future model applications may also help identify significant covariates (i.e. age, gender, and disease state) in upcoming clinical trials.

Dependency of cortisol suppression on the administration time of inhaled corticosteroids.

Endogenous cortisol suppression is one of the major systemic side effects of inhaled corticosteroids in the treatment of asthma. A previously developed pharmacokinetic/ pharmacodynamic approach was used to evaluate the influence of administration time on the cumulative cortisol suppression (CCS) after single doses of the inhaled corticosteroids flunisolide and fluticasone propionate. Administration time-dependent simulations of CCS were performed with drug-specific pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters obtained from previous clinical trials. Both drugs showed similar diurnal variation in CCS, dependent on the administration time, with maximum suppression when administered in the early morning at approximately 3 AM. The optimum administration time for minimized CCS was in the afternoon but was shifted from 3 PM for fluticasone propionate to later time points around 7 PM for flunisolide, probably because of the shorter terminal elimination half-life of flunisolide. Regarding peak to trough fluctuation, however, CCS after fluticasone propionate showed only half the administration time dependency as after flunisolide. Therefore, the ratio between CCS after flunisolide and after fluticasone propionate also followed administration time-dependent variations. This led to the conclusion that administration time has to be considered as a pivotal influential factor in clinical studies comparing CCS among different inhaled corticosteroids.