The Effects of Cue Reliability on Crossmodal Recalibration in Adults and Children.

Reliability-based cue combination is a hallmark of multisensory integration, while the role of cue reliability for crossmodal recalibration is less understood. The present study investigated whether visual cue reliability affects audiovisual recalibration in adults and children. Participants had to localize sounds, which were presented either alone or in combination with a spatially discrepant high- or low-reliability visual stimulus. In a previous study we had shown that the ventriloquist effect (indicating multisensory integration) was overall larger in the children groups and that the shift in sound localization toward the spatially discrepant visual stimulus decreased with visual cue reliability in all groups. The present study replicated the onset of the immediate ventriloquist aftereffect (a shift in unimodal sound localization following a single exposure of a spatially discrepant audiovisual stimulus) at the age of 6-7 years. In adults the immediate ventriloquist aftereffect depended on visual cue reliability, whereas the cumulative ventriloquist aftereffect (reflecting the audiovisual spatial discrepancies over the complete experiment) did not. In 6-7-year-olds the immediate ventriloquist aftereffect was independent of visual cue reliability. The present results are compatible with the idea of immediate and cumulative crossmodal recalibrations being dissociable processes and that the immediate ventriloquist aftereffect is more closely related to genuine multisensory integration.

Multisensory Integration Develops Prior to Crossmodal Recalibration.

It has been hypothesized that crossmodal recalibration plays a crucial role for the development of multisensory integration capabilities [1]. To test the developmental trajectory of multisensory integration and crossmodal recalibration, we used a combined ventriloquist/ventriloquist aftereffect paradigm [2] in children aged 5-9 years. The ventriloquist effect (indicating multisensory integration), that is, the shift of auditory localization toward simultaneously presented but spatially discrepant visual stimuli, was larger in children than in adults, which was attributed to a lower auditory localization precision in the children. In fact, the size of the ventriloquist effect depended on the visual stimulus reliability in both children and adults. In all groups, the ventriloquist effect was best explained by a causal inference model. In contrast to their multisensory integration capabilities, 5-year-old children did not recalibrate. The immediate ventriloquist aftereffect (indicating recalibration after a single exposure to a spatially discrepant audio-visual stimulus) emerged in 6- to 7-year-old children, whereas the cumulative ventriloquist aftereffect (reflecting recalibration to the audio-visual spatial discrepancies over the complete experiment) was not observed before the age of 8 years. First, in contrast to common beliefs, the present results provide evidence that multisensory integration precedes rather than follows crossmodal recalibration during development. Second, we report developmental evidence for a dissociation of the processes involved in multisensory integration and immediate as well as cumulative recalibration. We speculate that multisensory integration is a prerequisite for crossmodal recalibration, because the multisensory percept, rather than unimodal cues, might comprise a crucial signal for the calibration of the sensory systems.

Infants are superior in implicit crossmodal learning and use other learning mechanisms than adults.

During development internal models of the sensory world must be acquired which have to be continuously adapted later. We used event-related potentials (ERP) to test the hypothesis that infants extract crossmodal statistics implicitly while adults learn them when task relevant. Participants were passively exposed to frequent standard audio-visual combinations (A1V1, A2V2, p=0.35 each), rare recombinations of these standard stimuli (A1V2, A2V1, p=0.10 each), and a rare audio-visual deviant with infrequent auditory and visual elements (A3V3, p=0.10). While both six-month-old infants and adults differentiated between rare deviants and standards involving early neural processing stages only infants were sensitive to crossmodal statistics as indicated by a late ERP difference between standard and recombined stimuli. A second experiment revealed that adults differentiated recombined and standard combinations when crossmodal combinations were task relevant. These results demonstrate a heightened sensitivity for crossmodal statistics in infants and a change in learning mode from infancy to adulthood.