[Functional Hypersalivation in children and adults - therapy under consideration of recent guideline]. / Leitliniengerechte Behandlung von funktioneller Hypersalivation bei Kindern und Erwachsenen.

A functional hypersalivation reduces patient's quality of life by the need of repeated changes of cloths, skin damage around the mouth and reduced personal contacts. The indication to treat hypersalivation is justified furthermore when respiratory infections by saliva aspiration occur. Transnasal swallowing endoscopy allows to evaluate sufficiently dysphagia with limited risks. With this method therapy options can be judged for effectiveness. There are other additional radiologic assessments to complete diagnostic. Swallowing therapy should be initiated as first-line approach for hypersalivation and offers several treatment concepts to overcome the syndrome. Glycopyrrolate bromid received approval for children and adolescents as it reduces saliva flow relevantly with limited risk. Other anticholinergic drugs are restricted in use because of their side effects and off-label-use situation. Ultrasound guided injections of botulinum toxine in salivary glands are an established treatment option since decades. Meanwhile, the evidence for this method has improved, so Incobotulinum toxine is an approved therapy for chronic hypersalivation in adults, whereby new injections are needed about every four months. In the light of effective medical options, surgical approaches such as salivary duct relocation are recommended less often today because of invasiveness and failure. Radiotherapy is reserved mainly for neurodegenerative diseases and shows good response, but the cancer induction risks need to be discussed. A close follow-up regime is necessary to establish compliance not only by the patient, but also by his family and caregivers. By this, treatment effects can be optimized and therapies can be adjusted individually.

[Hypersalivation - Update of the S2k guideline (AWMF) in short form]. / Hypersalivation ­ Aktualisierung der S2k-Leitlinie (AWMF) in gekürzter Darstellung.

Hypersalivation describes a relatively excessive salivary flow, which wets the patient himself and his surroundings. It may result because of insufficient oro-motor function, dysphagia, decreased central control and coordination. This update presents recent changes and innovation in the treatment of hypersalivation.Multidisciplinary diagnostic and treatment evaluation is recommended already at early stage and focus on dysphagia, saliva aspiration, and oro-motor deficiencies. Clinical screening tools and diagnostics such as fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing generate important data on therapy selection and control. Many cases profit from swallowing therapy programmes in order to activate compensation mechanisms as long compliances is given. In children with hypotonic oral muscles, oral stimulation plates can induce a relevant symptom release because of the improved lip closure. The pharmacologic treatment improved for pediatric cases as glycopyrrolate fluid solution (Sialanar®) is now indicated for hypersalivation within the E. U. The injection of botulinum toxin into the salivary glands has shown safe and effective results with long lasting saliva reduction. Here, a phase III trial is completed for Incobotulinum toxin A and, in the U. S., is indicated for the treatment of adult patients with chronic hypersalivation. Surgical treatment should be reserved for isolated cases. External radiation is judged as a safe and effective therapy when using modern 3 D techniques to minimize tissue damage. Therapy effects and symptom severity has to be followed, especially in cases with underlying neurodegenerative disease.

Hypersalivation: update of the German S2k guideline (AWMF) in short form.

Hypersalivation describes a relatively excessive salivary flow, which wets the patient himself and his surroundings. It may result because of insufficient oro-motor function, dysphagia, decreased central control and coordination. This update presents recent changes and innovation in the treatment of hypersalivation. Multidisciplinary diagnostic and treatment evaluation is recommended already at early stage and focus on dysphagia, saliva aspiration, and oro-motor deficiencies. Clinical screening tools and diagnostics such as fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing generate important data on therapy selection and control. Many cases profit from swallowing therapy programmes to activate compensation mechanisms as long compliances are given. In children with hypotonic oral muscles, oral stimulation plates can induce a relevant symptom release because of the improved lip closure. The pharmacologic treatment improved for pediatric cases as glycopyrrolate fluid solution (Sialanar®) is now indicated for hypersalivation within the EU. The injection of botulinum toxin into the salivary glands has shown safe and effective results with long-lasting saliva reduction. Here, a phase III trial is completed for incobotulinum toxin A and, in the US, is indicated for the treatment of adult patients with chronic hypersalivation. Surgical treatment should be reserved for isolated cases. External radiation is judged as a safe and effective therapy when using modern 3D techniques to minimize tissue damage. Therapy effects and symptom severity have to be followed, especially in cases with underlying neurodegenerative disease.

Reduction of salivary flow with botulinum toxin: extended report on 33 patients with drooling, salivary fistulas, and sialadenitis.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: The aim of the study was the evaluation of the clinical data of 33 patients who had had drooling attributable to various diseases, salivary fistulas, and sialadenitis and had been treated with injection of botulinum toxin type A (Botox). A controlled follow-up study documenting efficiency, possible side effects, and duration of the effect of treatment was also performed. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective clinical evaluation. METHODS: Thirty-three patients with drooling attributable to head and neck carcinoma, neurodegenerative diseases, stroke, or idiopathic hypersalivation or with salivary fistula or chronic sialadenitis received injections of 20 to 65 U botulinum toxin type A into salivary glands under sonographic control. The entire salivary flow rate and the output per minute of the salivary analytes thiocyanate, total protein, alpha-amylase, acid phosphatase, kallikrein, and immunoglobulin A were measured at various times before and after injection. The patients were examined with regard to severity of their symptoms, including sonographic control investigation of their cephalic salivary glands. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients (79% of all patients) reported a distinct improvement of their symptoms after toxin injection. Seven patients noted a return of high salivation rates and requested a second injection after 4 to 7 months. Duration of toxin effect varied widely among individuals. In general, salivary flow rates and thiocyanate output dropped sharply within 1 week after injection and had increased again after a period of 12 to 16 weeks. Conversely, amylase outputs increased during this period, whereas the outputs of the other analytes remained roughly constant. Sonography did not reveal any major changes in salivary gland parenchyma, and side effects were not noted. CONCLUSION: Reduction of salivary flow in patients with drooling, salivary fistulas, or chronic sialadenitis by local injection of botulinum toxin type A into the salivary glands proved to be a dependable therapy for these disorders, as shown in the present extended report on 33 patients. Side effects were not observed. The effect of toxin application lasted for approximately 3 months. Based on their results, the authors recommend botulinum toxin injection as the therapy of choice in patients with the problem of drooling.

Up-to-date report of botulinum toxin therapy in patients with drooling caused by different etiologies.

PURPOSE: In this study, we evaluated the clinical data for patients with drooling caused by various diseases, treated by injection of botulinum toxin A. We also present a controlled follow-up study documenting efficiency, possible adverse events, and duration of the effect of treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirteen patients with drooling caused by head and neck carcinoma, neurodegenerative diseases, or stroke received injections of 50 to 65 U botulinum toxin A (Botox; Allergan, Irvine, CA) in both submandibular and both parotid glands under sonographic control. We measured whole salivary flow rate and the salivary analytes of total protein, alpha-amylase, acid phosphatase, kallikrein, and immunoglobulin A at various times before and after injection. The patients were examined for severity of symptoms, including sonographic investigation of cephalic salivary glands. RESULTS: All 13 patients reported a distinct improvement of their symptoms within 2 weeks after toxin injection. Three patients noted a return of high salivation rates after 12 weeks. Duration of toxin effect varied widely between individuals. In general, salivary flow rates dropped sharply within 1 week after injection but had risen again after 12 weeks. Conversely, analyte concentrations increased in the first stages of treatment and later decreased, returning to pretherapy levels. Sonography did not reveal any major changes of salivary gland parenchyma, and side effects were absent. CONCLUSIONS: Local injection of botulinum toxin A into the salivary glands proved to be a dependable therapy for drooling caused by various etiologies, as shown in 13 patients. Adverse events were not seen. The effect of toxin application lasted for about 3 months. To further clarify this aspect, long-term studies are under way.

Botulinum toxin to reduce saliva flow: selected indications for ultrasound-guided toxin application into salivary glands.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: The study investigates the effect of local injections of botulinum toxin type A (Botox) into the major salivary glands of the head in various states of hypersalivation. In particular, we studied pathological states with permanent as well as passing hypersalivation disorders and present new indications for local application of botulinum toxin to the salivary glands. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective clinical investigation. METHODS: A total of 55 to 65 units of Botox were injected under sonographic control into the left and right parotid and submandibular glands of four patients with hypersalivation resulting from head and neck carcinoma, tracheostomy, and "idiopathic" hypersalivation disorder. At defined time intervals following injection, flow rate, total protein and immunoglobulin A content, and the enzymatic activities of amylase, acid phosphatase, and kallikrein were determined in the saliva. The patients were clinically examined to assess the severity of their symptoms, including sonographic control of the major salivary glands. RESULTS: All four patients reported distinct improvement of their symptoms within 1 week after injection. Salivary flow rate had considerably dropped, whereas the concentrations of the salivary components were much increased. Sonography did not reveal any changes of the salivary gland parenchyma. Therapeutic side effects were absent. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of hypersalivation by local injections of Botox into the salivary glands of the head is a reliable and efficient therapy without side effects for certain otolaryngological diseases, especially if injections are performed under sonographic control. Extension of this therapeutic concept to other indications is suggested.