ABSTRACT
This study evaluated, at laboratory scale, if the using iron naturally present (0.3 mg L-1) and adding 10 mg L-1 of hydrogen peroxide was effective to remove 24.3 mgL-1 of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) from groundwater samples by simulated solar irradiation (global intensity = 300 W m-2). Under these conditions, the degradation of 2,4-D reached 75.2 % and the apparition of its main oxidation byproduct 2,4-dichlorophenol (DCP) was observed. On the other hand, pH exhibited an increasing from 7.0 to 8.3 during the experiment. Experiments using Milli-Q water at pH 7.0, iron, and H2O2 concentrations of 0.3 and 10 mg L-1, respectively, were carried out in order to study the effect of ions such as carbonate species, phosphate, and fluoride in typical concentrations often found in groundwater. Ion concentrations were combined by using a factorial experimental design 23. Results showed that carbonates and fluoride did not produce a detrimental effect on the 2,4-D degradation, while phosphate inhibited the process. In this case, the pH increased also from 7.0 to 7.95 and 8.99. Effect of parameters such as pH, iron concentration, and hydrogen peroxide concentration on the 2,4-D degradation by the photo-Fenton process in groundwater was evaluated by using a factorial experimental design 23. Results showed that the pH was the main parameter affecting the process. This study shows for the first time that using the photo-Fenton process at circumneutral pH and iron naturally present seems to be a promising process to remove pesticides from groundwater.
Subject(s)
2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic Acid/chemistry , Groundwater/chemistry , Hydrogen Peroxide/chemistry , Iron/chemistry , Photolysis , Water Pollutants, Chemical/chemistry , Hydrogen-Ion Concentration , Oxidation-ReductionABSTRACT
Objetivo Evaluar la eficiencia de dos sistemas de filtración casera: LifeStraw® family (FM) y Filtro de Olla Cerámica (FOC) en el tratamiento del agua para consumo humano bajo condiciones controladas de laboratorio y en términos de remoción de Turbiedad y E.coli. Métodos Ambos sistemas se operaron durante 6 meses tratando diariamente 7,5 litros de sustrato sintético. La turbiedad del sustrato se ajustó con Caolín y la concentración de E.coli con la réplica de la cepa ATCC 95922. Los resultados obtenidos en términos de remoción de turbiedad y E. coli fueron evaluados con un análisis de varianza (ANOVA) y considerando aspectos operativos y de mantenimiento. Resultados La turbiedad del sustrato sintético presentó un promedio 32,3 ± 2,8 UNT y la concentración de E. coli 3,9 x105 UFC/100mL. Ambos sistemas de filtración disminuyeron la turbiedad a niveles menores de 2 UNT y lograron la inactivación del 100 % de E.coli. Se encontraron diferencias significativas en la remoción de turbiedad siendo más eficiente el FM (99,2 % ± 0,4) que el FOC (97,6 % ± 1.14). Conclusiones Los dos sistemas de filtración son adecuados para el tratamiento del agua a nivel casero, cumpliendo con la reglamentación Colombiana. El FM resultó más eficiente en remoción de turbiedad y tasa de filtración; Sin embargo, cuando se tienen en cuenta aspectos como aceptabilidad social operación, mantenimiento y vida útil, el filtro de olla cerámica parece más apropiado especialmente en áreas rurales.(AU)
Objective To evaluate under laboratory conditions, the removal efficiency of turbidity and E. coli of two household water filters: LifeStraw® family (MF) and ceramic pot filter (CPF). Methods The two systems were operated over 6 months using two identical control units per system, treating 7.5 L/d of a synthetic substrate used as raw water. The turbidity of the substrate was adjusted with Kaolinite and the E. coli concentration, with a replica of the ATCC 95922 strain. The differences of effluent quality of the systems, in terms of turbidity and E. coli, were evaluated with Analysis of Variance (ANOVA). Operative and maintenance aspects, that could limit or enhance the use of the systems, were also considered in the evaluation. Results The water synthetic substrate quality had an average of 32.2 ± 2.8 NTU for turbidity and 3,9x105 UFC/100 mL for E. coli. Both systems reduce the turbidity to values below 2 NTU with an inactivation of 100 % of E. coli. Statistical differences were found between the systems in terms of turbidity removal, MF being more efficient than the CPF (99,2 ± 0.4 % and 97.6 % ± 1.14, respectively). Conclusions Both systems are suitable for household water supply treatment, acheiving the water quality standards established by Colombian regulations. The MF was more efficient for suspended solids removal and filtration rate, but when economic, operative, and maintenance aspects along with social acceptability and lifespan are considered, the CPF seems more suitable, especially in rural areas.(AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Drinking Water/analysis , Water Turbidity/analysis , Water Purification/standards , Escherichia coli/isolation & purification , Filtration/methods , ColombiaABSTRACT
Objective To evaluate under laboratory conditions, the removal efficiency of turbidity and E. coli of two household water filters: LifeStraw® family (MF) and ceramic pot filter (CPF). Methods The two systems were operated over 6 months using two identical control units per system, treating 7.5 L/d of a synthetic substrate used as raw water. The turbidity of the substrate was adjusted with Kaolinite and the E. coli concentration, with a replica of the ATCC 95922 strain. The differences of effluent quality of the systems, in terms of turbidity and E. coli, were evaluated with Analysis of Variance (ANOVA). Operative and maintenance aspects, that could limit or enhance the use of the systems, were also considered in the evaluation. Results The water synthetic substrate quality had an average of 32.2 ± 2.8 NTU for turbidity and 3,9x105 UFC/100 mL for E. coli. Both systems reduce the turbidity to values below 2 NTU with an inactivation of 100 % of E. coli. Statistical differences were found between the systems in terms of turbidity removal, MF being more efficient than the CPF (99,2 ± 0.4 % and 97.6 % ± 1.14, respectively). Conclusions Both systems are suitable for household water supply treatment, acheiving the water quality standards established by Colombian regulations. The MF was more efficient for suspended solids removal and filtration rate, but when economic, operative, and maintenance aspects along with social acceptability and lifespan are considered, the CPF seems more suitable, especially in rural areas.
