ABSTRACT
Beside the war, an unfavorable epidemiological situation and a large number of foreign peace troops that entered the country without having been previously tested for infectious diseases, the number of AIDS cases in our country remained relatively low. The transfusion service played a considerable part in the prevention of HIV infection spread. Although the blood transfusion service was faced with higher demands for blood and blood products, throughout the period of the war not a single blood unit was imported and no single unit of blood components was transfused without having been previously tested for the presence of viral disease markers. Despite enormous economic difficulties, three new diagnostic tests were then introduced in our transfusion practice as a regular procedure: anti-HCV in 1993, anti-HIV 2 in 1994 and anti-HIV 1/0 in 1995.
Subject(s)
Blood Transfusion , HIV Infections/prevention & control , Warfare , AIDS Serodiagnosis , Blood Donors , Croatia , Humans , Transfusion ReactionSubject(s)
Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome/epidemiology , Cross-Cultural Comparison , Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome/transmission , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Child, Preschool , Croatia/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Incidence , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Pregnancy , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
Patients who refuse blood transfusion for personal or religious reasons present complex medical, legal and moral problems. Blood transfusion has been doctrinally forbidden for Jehovah's Witnesses since 1945. Their refusal is based on the strict interpretation of several Biblical passages. A clear understanding of the philosophy of the Jehovah's Witnesses regarding blood transfusion and of the medicolegal and ethical aspects of their care is essential to clinicians who care for such patients. Various ethical principles, including the patient's autonomy, the interest of society in preserving life and the dignity of medical profession can be confronted. There are no clear guidelines which physicians can follow in deciding to treat or not treat in the presence of a patient's refusal. However, most authors agree that a competent adult has an absolute right to decline medical treatment, and that it is not morally or ethically correct to force patient to an unwanted treatment. We wished to present the experiences with the use of alternative methods in the treatment of Jehovah's Witnesses and to discuss ethical and legal aspects of treatment decisions in the presence of blood transfusion refusal.
