Application of paclitaxel-eluting metal mesh stents within the pig ureter: an experimental study.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the present study is to compare the standard bare metal stents (BMS) with the Paclitaxel-Drug Eluting Stent (DES) in the ureter of a pig model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We report on an experimental study with ten female pigs weighing between 25 and 30 kg. The stents were randomly placed in either the right or left ureter in each of 10 study animals, for a total of 20 stented ureters. Ten ureters were stented with an R-Stent (Orbus Medical Technologies, Hoevelaken Netherlands), and ten with a Paclitaxel-Eluting Coronary Stent (Boston Scientific, Natick, MA, USA). Patency was measured by radiograph of the nephrostomy tract, intravenous urography and virtual endoscopy at 24 hours and 21 days after the initial procedure, respectively. RESULTS: Free flow of urine through the stents into the bladder was documented in all stented ureters 24 hours after stent insertion by radiograph of the nephrostomy tract. At the 21 day follow-up examination, 5 R-Stents were found to be completely occluded and two partially stenosed, whereas no occluded stent was detected in the Paclitaxel-DES group. Pathology examination of the stents at 21 days follow-up showed that the obstructed R-Stents generated severe inflammation with metaplasia of the urothelium. The Paclitaxel-Eluting MS generated a mild inflammatory response within the ureteral lumen at the site of the stent, without hindering ureteral patency. R-stents proved to develop more hyperplasia compared to the Paclitaxel-Eluting MS. CONCLUSIONS: Paclitaxel-DES, when compared with the standard R- Stent BMS, generated less inflammation and/or hyperplasia of the surrounding tissues, thus maintaining ureteral patency. Long-term animal trials are required to further validate our results.

Comparison of the effect of sildenafil and apomorphine SL on nocturnal erections in healthy volunteers: a placebo-controlled study.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of sildenafil and sublingual (sl) apomorphine on nocturnal erections. METHODS: In a prospective, single-blinded, placebo-controlled at-home study we compared the effect of apomorphine sl and sildenafil on sleep-related erectile activity in 30 healthy potent volunteers (mean age, 26.4 years; range, 23-35 years; Erectile Function domain of the International Index of Erectile Function > or =26), not reporting any subjective sleep abnormality during 4 consecutive nights with rigidity monitoring (NPTR) with the RigiScantrade mark device. After the first night of adaptation, they were randomized to receive placebo or apomorphine sl 2mg or sildenafil 50mg taken at bedtime during the following 3 consecutive nights. RESULTS: Sildenafil increased the mean+/-SE number of erections, overall length of erectile events, and the time of erections with rigidity >60% at both tip and base, as compared to placebo. The same parameters were reduced after administration of apomorphine sl. Similar findings were observed with regards to Rigidity Activity Units and Tumescence Activity Units. CONCLUSIONS: Our results confirm that sildenafil taken at bedtime might increase nocturnal erectile activity also in young potent men as compared to placebo. Apomorphine sl taken at bedtime seems to have the opposite effect.