Combined photodynamic therapy and transpupillary thermotherapy for small choroidal melanoma.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine whether combining verteporfin-based photodynamic therapy (PDT) and transpupillary thermotherapy (TTT) achieves adequate tumour control while maintaining visual acuity in individuals with small choroidal melanoma of amelanotic, melanotic, and variable pigmentation. DESIGN: Individuals with posterior choroidal melanomas up to 3 mm in height underwent verteporfin-based PDT followed by immediate TTT. Further combined laser therapy was performed if a poor response was noted at 12 weeks or beyond. Tumours that demonstrated significant further growth were treated with brachytherapy or enucleation. A total of 37 eyes of 37 patients from the Terrace Eye Centre in Brisbane, Australia were studied. Average age of participants was 59.62 ± 12.45 years, and 17 of 37 participants were female (46%). METHODS: This was a retrospective, noncomparative interventional study. RESULTS: Seven of the 37 participants (19%) had recurrence of their tumour requiring further brachytherapy or enucleation. There was no statistically significant difference in visual acuity before and after treatment. There were no baseline characteristics that predicted treatment outcome. Ten individuals developed complications including epiretinal membrane (16%), scotoma (8%), cataract (3%), and macular edema (3%). No individuals experienced extraocular extension or progressed to metastatic disease. The mean follow-up time was 49 months. CONCLUSION: Combined PDT and TTT achieved 81% tumour control in this study while preserving visual acuity. However, higher rates of local recurrence compared with brachytherapy warrant close follow-up to identify recurrences early.

Whole genome landscapes of uveal melanoma show an ultraviolet radiation signature in iris tumours.

Uveal melanoma (UM) is the most common intraocular tumour in adults and despite surgical or radiation treatment of primary tumours, ~50% of patients progress to metastatic disease. Therapeutic options for metastatic UM are limited, with clinical trials having little impact. Here we perform whole-genome sequencing (WGS) of 103 UM from all sites of the uveal tract (choroid, ciliary body, iris). While most UM have low tumour mutation burden (TMB), two subsets with high TMB are seen; one driven by germline MBD4 mutation, and another by ultraviolet radiation (UVR) exposure, which is restricted to iris UM. All but one tumour have a known UM driver gene mutation (GNAQ, GNA11, BAP1, PLCB4, CYSLTR2, SF3B1, EIF1AX). We identify three other significantly mutated genes (TP53, RPL5 and CENPE).

A Panel of Circulating MicroRNAs Detects Uveal Melanoma With High Precision.

PURPOSE: To determine if a circulating microRNA (miRNA) panel could be used to distinguish between uveal melanoma and uveal nevi. METHODS: We report on a multicenter, cross-sectional study conducted between June 2012 and September 2015. The follow-up time was approximately 3 to 5 years. Blood was drawn from participants presenting with a uveal nevus (n = 10), localized uveal melanoma (n = 50), or metastatic uveal melanoma (n = 5). Levels of 17 miRNAs were measured in blood samples of study participants using a sensitive real-time PCR system. RESULTS: A panel of six miRNAs (miR-16, miR-145, miR-146a, miR-204, miR-211, and miR-363-3p) showed significant differences between participants with uveal nevi compared with patients with localized and metastatic uveal melanoma. Importantly, miR-211 was able to accurately distinguish metastatic disease from localized uveal melanoma (P < 0.0001; area under the curve = 0.96). When the six-miRNA panel was evaluated as a group it had the ability to identify uveal melanoma when four or more miRNAs (93% sensitivity and 100% specificity) reached or exceeded their cut-point. CONCLUSIONS: This miRNA panel, in tandem with clinical findings, may be suited to confirm benign lesions. In addition, due to the panel's high precision in identifying malignancy, it has the potential to augment melanoma detection in subsequent clinical follow-up of lesions with atypical clinical features. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: Uveal nevi mimic the appearance of uveal melanoma and their transformation potential cannot be definitively determined without a biopsy. This panel is most relevant at the nevus stage and in lesions with uncertain malignant potential as a companion diagnostic tool to assist in clinical decision-making.

Correction to: Prolonged stable disease in a uveal melanoma patient with germline MBD4 nonsense mutation treated with pembrolizumab and ipilimumab.

The authors regret that the online version of this article contains an error. The MBD4 mutation in sample MM138 was given an incorrect dbSNP ID. The correct ID is rs769076971.

Prolonged stable disease in a uveal melanoma patient with germline MBD4 nonsense mutation treated with pembrolizumab and ipilimumab.

There is currently no effective treatment for metastasised uveal melanoma (UM). Recently, it was reported that a UM patient was responsive to checkpoint inhibitor (CI) treatment, due to a high tumour mutation burden correlated with a germline loss-of-function MBD4 mutation. Here, we report on another UM patient who carried an MBD4 germline nonsense variant (p.Leu563Ter) and her tumour showed a fivefold higher than average mutation burden. We confirmed the association between germline loss-of-function variant in MBD4 and CI response. The patient experienced stable disease (10 months) and survived 2 years with metastatic disease, which is twice as long as median survival. Additionally, the frequency of MBD4 loss-of-function variants in reported UM cohorts was > 20 times higher than in an aggregated population genome database (P < 5 × 10-5), implying a potential role as UM predisposition gene. These findings provide a strong basis for the inclusion of MBD4 in the screening of potential UM-prone families as well as stratification of immunotherapy.