Relatively undervalued: comparing the work relative value units of neuropsychological evaluation to other services.

Objective: We examined work relative value units (wRVUs) and associated revenue of current procedural terminology (CPT) codes for evaluation and management (E&M) services, neuropsychological evaluation (NPE), psychological evaluation (PE), and psychotherapy. Method: CPT code wRVUs were aggregated for E&M (99202-99215), NPE (96116, 96132, 96133, 96136, and 96137), PE (90791, 96130, 96131, 96136, and 96137), and psychotherapy (90791 and 90832-90837 with and without the complexity modifier, 90785). Per minute wRVUs were calculated for each CPT code. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services 2023 conversion factor ($33.8872) was multiplied by wRVUs to examine reimbursement per hour and per prototypical four-hour clinic slot. Results: The wRVUs per minute showed the following ranges: 0.032-0.07 for E&M services, 0.015-0.063 for NPE, 0.015-0.124 for PE, and 0.043-0.135 for psychotherapy. Average hourly revenue ranged from $72 for NPE to $132 for psychotherapy with the complexity modifier. Revenue for prototypical four-hour clinics ranged from $283 for NPE to $493 for psychotherapy with the complexity modifier. PE and psychotherapy services were valued at 124-184% of NPE. Conclusions: E&M code wRVUs increase with case complexity reflecting greater work intensity, and a modifier to PE and psychotherapy captures additional effort needed in complex cases. In contrast, NPE codes lack a complexity modifier, and NPE wRVUs are lower than those of PE and psychotherapy, the latter of which can be billed by master's level providers. NPE is undervalued compared to PE and psychotherapy based on wRVUs currently assigned to the CPT codes used for the respective services.

Estimating Premorbid Ability in Rehabilitation Patients Using the Test of Premorbid Functioning and Wide Range Achievement Test-Fourth Edition.

Objective: This study examined premorbid ability estimate concordance using Test of Premorbid Functioning predicted Full Scale Intelligent Quotient (TOPF-IQ) and Wide Range Achievement Test-Fourth Edition Word Reading (WRAT4-WR). Method: The sample (N = 145) was 28% female with average age and education of 40.6 and 13.2 years, respectively. Outpatient neuropsychological evaluations were conducted in a rehabilitation setting. Measures included the TOPF, WRAT4-WR, Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Fourth Edition, and other neuropsychological tests. Non-WAIS measures defined impairment groups. Analyses included t tests, pairwise correlations, concordance correlation coefficients, and root mean square differences. Results: TOPF-IQ, WRAT4-WR, and Full Scale Intelligent Quotient scores were not significantly different but were lower than normative mean. TOPF-IQ and WRAT4-WR showed acceptable agreement (concordance correlation coefficient = .92; root mean square difference = 5.9). Greater premorbid-current ability differences were observed in the impaired group. TOPF-IQ and WRAT4-WR showed lower but similar agreement with Full Scale Intelligence Quotient in the unimpaired group. Conclusions: Findings support the WRAT4-WR in predicting premorbid ability in rehabilitation settings.

Examining the Cognitive Proficiency Index in rehabilitation patients.

This study examined the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Fourth Edition (WAIS-IV) Cognitive Proficiency Index (CPI) in relation to other WAIS-IV indices, overall test battery mean (OTBM), and impairment (IMP) in an outpatient rehabilitation setting. Participants (N = 329) were 35% female and 88% Caucasian with average age and education of 42.9 (SD = 13.5) and 13.6 (SD = 2.4) years, respectively. Participants were grouped by diagnosis and validity: traumatic brain injury (TBI; n = 176; 39% mild), cerebrovascular accident (CVA; n = 52), other neurologic and psychiatric conditions (OTH; n = 49), and questionable performance validity (QPV; n = 52). OTBM was calculated from non-WAIS-IV tests; IMP was dichotomously defined as four or more non-WAIS-IV scores below cutoff (≤35 T). Significant group differences were observed on CPI, WAIS-IV indices, OTBM, and IMP. CPI significantly contributed (ß = .51) to a linear regression model predicting OTBM (R2 = .63) with education and GAI as covariates. A logistic regression model with IMP as the outcome and education, GAI, and CPI as predictors correctly classified 80% of cases with area under the curve of .86. A previously identified cutoff (CPI < 84) correctly classified 65-78% of clinical groups categorized by IMP. A novel cutoff (CPI ≤ 80) differentiated clinical participants with history of mild TBI from the QPV group with sensitivity of 44.2% and specificity of 89.7%. CPI showed incremental validity in predicting OTBM and IMP and warrants further study as a useful clinical addition to other WAIS-IV indices.