Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Publication year range
1.
G Ital Cardiol (Rome) ; 22(7): 579-581, 2021 Jul.
Article in Italian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34175914

ABSTRACT

Mechanisms leading to mitral regurgitation can be multiple and have different etiologies. We present the case of severe mitral insufficiency due to posterior papillary muscle rupture in a young man, with exertional dyspnea, but permanently asymptomatic for chest pain and without clinical and laboratory signs of myocardial ischemia at the time of our evaluation.


Subject(s)
Mitral Valve Insufficiency , Myocardial Ischemia , Humans , Male , Mitral Valve/diagnostic imaging , Mitral Valve/surgery , Mitral Valve Insufficiency/diagnostic imaging , Mitral Valve Insufficiency/etiology , Mitral Valve Insufficiency/surgery , Myocardial Ischemia/etiology , Papillary Muscles/diagnostic imaging
2.
Int J Cardiol ; 220: 761-7, 2016 Oct 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27393863

ABSTRACT

AIMS: To define a benchmark target for an invasive strategy (IS) rate appropriate for performance assessment in intermediate-to-high risk non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS). METHODS AND RESULTS: During the BLITZ-4 campaign, which aimed at improving the quality of care in 163 Italian coronary care units, 4923/5786 (85.1%) of consecutive patients admitted with NSTE-ACS with troponin elevation and/or dynamic ST-T changes on the electrocardiogram were managed with IS. The reasons driving the choice (RDC) for a conservative strategy (CS) in the remaining 863 patients were prospectively recorded. In 33.8%, CS was mandatory because of patients refusal, known coronary anatomy or death before coronary angiography; in 52.8% it was clinically justified because of active stroke, bleeding, advanced frailty, severe comorbidities, contraindication to antiplatelet therapy or because they were considered to be at low risk; only in 13.4% the reasons, such as renal failure, advanced age or other, were less stringent. As compared to patients undergoing IS, those in the CS were 12years older and had significantly more severe comorbidities. The in-hospital and 6-month all-cause mortality were 9.0% vs 0.9% and 22.0% vs 3.9% in CS and IS groups respectively (p<0.0001 for both). CONCLUSION: As the RDC for CS were clinically correct in vast majority of cases the observed 85% invasive strategy rate may be considered as the desirable benchmark target in patients with NSTE-ACS. For the same reason, it remains questionable if the higher rate of IS could have improved the prognosis in CS patients, despite their highly unfavorable prognosis.


Subject(s)
Acute Coronary Syndrome/epidemiology , Acute Coronary Syndrome/therapy , Benchmarking/standards , Patient Admission/standards , Quality of Health Care/standards , Acute Coronary Syndrome/diagnostic imaging , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Benchmarking/methods , Coronary Angiography/standards , Electrocardiography/standards , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Hospital Mortality/trends , Humans , Italy/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Admission/trends , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...