Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Publication year range
1.
Article in Russian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32790978

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of the complex therapy of nonspecific low back pain (LBP) with amelotex, calmirex, kompligamB in comparison with the monotherapy with amelotex. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This observational study included sixty patients, aged 53.73±11.84 53 years, with nonspecific LBP. Patients were divided into 2 groups: the basic group (n=30) received calmirex (150mg 2 times a day during 10 days), amelotex (7.5 mg 2 times a day, 7 days) and kompligamB (1 ml once a day, 10 days). The control group (n=30) received only amelotex (7.5 mg 2 times a day, 7 days). The dynamics of the condition was assessed on a 10-point numerical rating scale (at rest, walking, palpation), the Oswestry functional status questionnaire (Oswestry Disability Index; ODI), as well as indicators of laboratory markers reflecting the severity of the inflammatory process (erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein (CRP)). RESULTS: The severity of pain syndrome significantly decreased in both groups, to a greater extent in the basic group, and ODI indicators also significantly improved in the basic group. CRP indicators showed more pronounced changes in the basic group. CONCLUSION: The complex therapy that affects all links in the formation of pain syndrome should be recommended to patients with LBP.


Subject(s)
Low Back Pain , Adult , Aged , Back Pain , Disability Evaluation , Humans , Middle Aged , Pain Measurement , Walking
2.
Article in Russian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31793541

ABSTRACT

AIM: To compare the efficacy of oral administration of the chondroprotector (CP) Sustagard Artro and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in reducing lower back pain and to assess the level of blood glucose in patients taking CP. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Sixty patients with spondylarthrosis (SA) were studied. Patients were randomized into the CP group (n=30), which received Sustagard Artro (1 sachet once a day for 6 weeks), and the NSAIDs group (n=30) treated with injectable forms of different groups of NSAIDs for 3-7 days. Pain intensity was evaluated by the numerical rating scale (NRS) and the Oswestry disability index (ODI). RESULTS: The reduction in the severity of pain on NRS was similar in both groups: 5.73±1.74 before treatment and 1.43±0.33 after treatment in the CP group; 6.03±0.93 and 1.17±0.97 in the NSAIDs group, respectively. No significant difference in the efficacy was observed between two groups on ODI: 34.66% at baseline and 1.86% after 6 weeks in the CP group; 37.47% and 2.27% in the NSAIDs group, respectively. Changes in the level of glucose were within the upper limit of normal in the CP group. CONCLUSION: Oral administration of CP (Sustagard Artro, sashe) reduces pain syndrome as effectively as NSAIDs.


Subject(s)
Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal , Low Back Pain , Administration, Oral , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use , Humans , Low Back Pain/drug therapy , Pain Measurement
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...