Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Vopr Virusol ; 63(2): 84-90, 2018 Apr 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36494926

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Human herpes virus type 6 (HHV 6) can cause serious infectious complications in immunodeficient patients. It is also capable of integrating into the genome of the infected cell. Due to this, there can be a misdiagnosis between viral integration and active infection during laboratory diagnostics. Thus, determination of HHV 6 infection using proper laboratory tools is relevant. Also the data on viral interference of HHV 6 and other herpes viruses are very poor especially for patients with hematological malignancies. The aim of the study was to identify laboratory markers of HHV 6 and the form of infection in patients with hematological malignancies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 98 patients with hematological malignancies positive for HHV 6 DNA during the infectious complication were enrolled in the study. Viral load in leukocytes and plasma of peripheral blood, antiviral M and G immunoglobulins and peripheral blood leukocytes count were evaluated. RESULTS: The majority of patients (66 out of 98, 67.3%) showed laboratory signs of latent HHV 6. Integrated HHV 6 was suspected in 2 patients due to high viral load (1.5x105 copies and 1.7x105 copies), but it was not confirmed subsequently. Additional testing of HCMV and EBV in patients with laboratory signs of active HHV 6 infection revealed the superiority of monoinfection over mixed infection (20 of 32, 62.5%). In cases of mixed infection, the most common co-infectant was HCMV observed in 9 out of 12 (75%) cases. Mild leukopenia accompanied HHV 6 active infection. CONCLUSION: Laboratory signs of latent HHV 6 tend to be prevalent in patients with hematological malignancies. In patients with laboratory markers of active HHV 6, the monoinfection demonstrated the superiority over mixed one. In cases of mixed infection, HCMV appeared to be the most commonly co-infectant. No cases of an integrated form of HHV 6 have been observed. The viral load of HHV 6 in leukocytes and blood plasma is almost 3 times lower in patients with a mixed infection than with a monoinfection. Active replication of HHV 6 was accompanied with mild leukopenia.

2.
Vopr Virusol ; 61(6): 280-284, 2016 Dec 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36494988

ABSTRACT

Data on hepatitis B (HBV) and c (HCV) viruses interference in hematological patients are described. Patients with a hematological malignancy are at high risk of HBV and HCV infection as recipients of multiple transfusions. Results of the laboratory testing of 339 blood samples of patients treated at the National Research center for Hematology, Russian Federation, were studied. Among these patients, HBV/HCV coinfection markers were observed in 153 patients; HBV markers only, in 76 patients; HCV markers only, in 110 patients. The vast majority of coinfected patients had HBV DNA in blood (significantly more in HBsAg-negative patients: 100% vs. 82.8%, p = 0. 0005). HBsAg-negative coinfected patients had low HBV DNA levels (102-103ME/ml) and reduced (or completely absent) HCV RNA levels. The virus interference leads to a decrease in the viral nucleic acid concentrations. Thus, virus detection should include implementation of high sensitive molecular techniques (such as real-time PCR), and an enhanced set of serological HBV markers along with routine screening methods (HBsAg, anti-HCV).

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...