ABSTRACT
A 30-year-old female with a medical history of gastrointestinal reflux and intravenous methamphetamine use was admitted to the hospital with complaints of fever and chills. Pantoae agglomerans was isolated in one out of two blood cultures. Although information was limited about the duration and efficacy of oral antibiotics to treat this type of infection, the patient recovered with oral antibiotic treatment following a short course of intravenous antibiotics.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: In the United States, healthcare providers document and code healthcare encounters and submit claims to insurers for reimbursement. Most providers eligible for individual-level insurer reimbursement do not receive coding/billing training. The purpose of this commentary is to provide an overview of training disparities. METHODS: The top 100 universities within five healthcare disciplines (dietetics, nursing, pharmacy, social work, medicine) were asked about available didactic curriculum and coding resources provided during training. Results were compared across disciplines, by geographic region, funding mechanism, and size. RESULTS: Twenty-seven percent of schools/universities contacted participated; the response was greater among public institutions (73%) and varied by discipline. Coverage of coding/billing in the didactic curriculum varied: it was covered in 40 dietetics programs (93%), 23 nursing programs (57%), and 14 pharmacy programs (28%). None of the 36 social work programs covered coding/billing, and only 5% of the 20 medical schools did. No statistically significant differences by region or funding were noted; however, coverage of coding/billing in the curriculum did differ by discipline (p<0.0001). DISCUSSION: Upon graduation, healthcare providers may be ill-prepared to code/bill for services. This knowledge is crucial for sustainable health service provision and does not appear to be consistently provided within curriculum to healthcare students. Further study is needed to understand and address this training gap.
