Use of a Dynamic Genetic Testing Approach for Childhood-Onset Epilepsy.

Importance: Although genetic testing is important for bringing precision medicine to children with epilepsy, it is unclear what genetic testing strategy is best in maximizing diagnostic yield. Objectives: To evaluate the diagnostic yield of an exome-based gene panel for childhood epilepsy and discuss the value of follow-up testing. Design, Setting, and Participants: A case series study was conducted on data from clinical genetic testing at Children's Hospital of Philadelphia was conducted from September 26, 2016, to January 8, 2018. Initial testing targeted 100 curated epilepsy genes for sequence and copy number analysis in 151 children with idiopathic epilepsy referred consecutively by neurologists. Additional genetic testing options were offered afterward. Exposures: Clinical genetic testing. Main Outcomes and Measures: Molecular diagnostic findings. Results: Of 151 patients (84 boys [55.6%]; median age, 4.2 years [interquartile range, 1.4-8.7 years]), 16 children (10.6%; 95% CI, 6%-16%) received a diagnosis after initial panel analysis. Parental testing for 15 probands with inconclusive results revealed de novo variants in 7 individuals (46.7%), resulting in an overall diagnostic yield of 15.3% (23 of 151; 95% CI, 9%-21%). Twelve probands with nondiagnostic panel findings were reflexed to exome sequencing, and 4 were diagnostic (33.3%; 95% CI, 6%-61%), raising the overall diagnostic yield to 17.9% (27 of 151; 95% CI, 12%-24%). The yield was highest (17 of 44 [38.6%; 95% CI, 24%-53%]) among probands with epilepsy onset in infancy (age, 1-12 months). Panel diagnostic findings involved 16 genes: SCN1A (n = 4), PRRT2 (n = 3), STXBP1 (n = 2), IQSEC2 (n = 2), ATP1A2, ATP1A3, CACNA1A, GABRA1, KCNQ2, KCNT1, SCN2A, SCN8A, DEPDC5, TPP1, PCDH19, and UBE3A (all n = 1). Exome sequencing analysis identified 4 genes: SMC1A, SETBP1, NR2F1, and TRIT1. For the remaining 124 patients, analysis of 13 additional genes implicated in epilepsy since the panel was launched in 2016 revealed promising findings in 6 patients. Conclusions and Relevance: Exome-based targeted panels appear to enable rapid analysis of a preselected set of genes while retaining flexibility in gene content. Successive genetic workup should include parental testing of select probands with inconclusive results and reflex to whole-exome trio analysis for the remaining nondiagnostic cases. Periodic reanalysis is needed to capture information in newly identified disease genes.

Correction: Secondary findings from clinical genomic sequencing: prevalence, patient perspectives, family history assessment, and health-care costs from a multisite study.

The originally published version of this Article contained errors in Fig. 2. The numbers below the black arrowheads were incorrect; please see incorrect Figure in associated Correction. These errors have now been corrected in the PDF and HTML versions of the Article.

Secondary findings from clinical genomic sequencing: prevalence, patient perspectives, family history assessment, and health-care costs from a multisite study.

PURPOSE: Clinical sequencing emerging in health care may result in secondary findings (SFs). METHODS: Seventy-four of 6240 (1.2%) participants who underwent genome or exome sequencing through the Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research (CSER) Consortium received one or more SFs from the original American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) recommended 56 gene-condition pair list; we assessed clinical and psychosocial actions. RESULTS: The overall adjusted prevalence of SFs in the ACMG 56 genes across the CSER consortium was 1.7%. Initially 32% of the family histories were positive, and post disclosure, this increased to 48%. The average cost of follow-up medical actions per finding up to a 1-year period was $128 (observed, range: $0-$678) and $421 (recommended, range: $141-$1114). Case reports revealed variability in the frequency of and follow-up on medical recommendations patients received associated with each SF gene-condition pair. Participants did not report adverse psychosocial impact associated with receiving SFs; this was corroborated by 18 participant (or parent) interviews. All interviewed participants shared findings with relatives and reported that relatives did not pursue additional testing or care. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that disclosure of SFs shows little to no adverse impact on participants and adds only modestly to near-term health-care costs; additional studies are needed to confirm these findings.

PCDH19-related epilepsy in a male with Klinefelter syndrome: Additional evidence supporting PCDH19 cellular interference disease mechanism.

Heterozygous de novo or inherited pathogenic variants in the PCDH19 gene cause a spectrum of neurodevelopmental features including developmental delay and seizures. PCDH19 epilepsy was previously known as "epilepsy and mental retardation limited to females", since the condition almost exclusively affects females. It is hypothesized that the co-existence of two populations of neurons, some with and some without PCDH19 protein expression, results in pathologically abnormal interactions between these neurons, a mechanism also referred to as cellular interference. Consequently, PCDH19-related epilepsies are inherited in an atypical X-linked pattern, such that hemizygous, non-mosaic, 46,XY males are typically unaffected, while individuals with a disease-causing PCDH19 variant, mainly heterozygous females and mosaic males, are affected. As a corollary to this hypothesis, an individual with Klinefelter syndrome (KS) (47,XXY) who has a heterozygous disease-causing PCDH19 variant should develop PCDH19-related epilepsy. Here, we report such evidence: - a male child with KS and PCDH19-related epilepsy - supporting the PCDH19 cellular interference disease hypothesis.

Utility and limitations of exome sequencing as a genetic diagnostic tool for children with hearing loss.

PURPOSE: Hearing loss (HL) is the most common sensory disorder in children. Prompt molecular diagnosis may guide screening and management, especially in syndromic cases when HL is the single presenting feature. Exome sequencing (ES) is an appealing diagnostic tool for HL as the genetic causes are highly heterogeneous. METHODS: ES was performed on a prospective cohort of 43 probands with HL. Sequence data were analyzed for primary and secondary findings. Capture and coverage analysis was performed for genes and variants associated with HL. RESULTS: The diagnostic rate using ES was 37.2%, compared with 15.8% for the clinical HL panel. Secondary findings were discovered in three patients. For 247 genes associated with HL, 94.7% of the exons were targeted for capture and 81.7% of these exons were covered at 20× or greater. Further analysis of 454 randomly selected HL-associated variants showed that 89% were targeted for capture and 75% were covered at a read depth of at least 20×. CONCLUSION: ES has an improved yield compared with clinical testing and may capture diagnoses not initially considered due to subtle clinical phenotypes. Technical challenges were identified, including inadequate capture and coverage of HL genes. Additional considerations of ES include secondary findings, cost, and turnaround time.

Utility and limitations of exome sequencing in the molecular diagnosis of pediatric inherited platelet disorders.

Inherited platelet disorders (IPD) are a heterogeneous group of rare disorders that affect platelet number and function and often predispose to other significant medical complications. In spite of the identification of over 50 IPD disease-associated genes, a molecular diagnosis is only identified in a minority (10%) of affected patients without a clinically suspected etiology. We studied a cohort of 21 pediatric patients with suspected IPDs by exome sequencing (ES) to: (1) examine the performance of the exome test for IPD genes, (2) determine if this exome-wide diagnostic test provided a higher diagnostic yield than has been previously reported, (3) to evaluate the frequency of variants of uncertain significance identified, and (4) to identify candidate variants for functional evaluation in patients with an uncertain or negative diagnosis. We established a high priority gene list of 53 genes, evaluated exome capture kit performance, and determined the coverage for these genes and disease-related variants. We identified likely disease causing variants in 5 of the 21 probands (23.8%) and variants of uncertain significance in 52% of patients studied. In conclusion, ES has the potential to molecularly diagnose causes of IPD, and to identify candidate genes for functional evaluation. Robust exome sequencing also requires that coverage of genes known to be associated with clinical findings of interest need to be carefully examined and supplemented if necessary. Clinicians who undertake ES should understand the limitations of the test and the full significance of results that may be returned.

Male-Specific Transcription Factor Occupancy Alone Does Not Account for Differential Methylation at Imprinted Genes in the mouse Germ Cell Lineage.

Genomic imprinting is an epigenetic mechanism that affects a subset of mammalian genes, resulting in monoallelic expression depending on the parental origin of the alleles. Imprinted regions contain regulatory elements that are methylated in the gametes in a sex-specific manner (differentially methylated regions; DMRs). DMRs are present at nonimprinted loci as well, but whereas most regions are equalized after fertilization, methylation at imprinted regions maintains asymmetry. We tested the hypothesis that paternally unmethylated DMRs are occupied by transcription factors (TFs) present during male gametogenesis. Meta-analysis of mouse RNA data to identify DNA-binding proteins expressed in male gametes and motif enrichment analysis of active promoters yielded a list of candidate TFs. We then asked whether imprinted or nonimprinted paternally unmethylated DMRs harbored motifs for these TFs, and found many shared motifs between the two groups. However, DMRs that are methylated in the male germ cells also share motifs with DMRs that remain unmethylated. There are recognition sequences exclusive to the unmethylated DMRs, whether imprinted or not, that correspond with cell-cycle regulators, such as p53. Thus, at least with the current available data, our results indicate a complex scenario in which TF occupancy alone is not likely to play a role in protecting unmethylated DMRs, at least during male gametogenesis. Rather, the epigenetic features of DMRs, regulatory sequences other than DMRs, and the role of DNA-binding proteins capable of endowing sequence specificity to DNA-methylating enzymes are feasible mechanisms and further investigation is needed to answer this question.

Association of maternal mRNA and phosphorylated EIF4EBP1 variants with the spindle in mouse oocytes: localized translational control supporting female meiosis in mammals.

In contrast to other species, localized maternal mRNAs are not believed to be prominent features of mammalian oocytes. We find by cDNA microarray analysis enrichment for maternal mRNAs encoding spindle and other proteins on the mouse oocyte metaphase II (MII) spindle. We also find that the key translational regulator, EIF4EBP1, undergoes a dynamic and complex spatially regulated pattern of phosphorylation at sites that regulate its association with EIF4E and its ability to repress translation. These phosphorylation variants appear at different positions along the spindle at different stages of meiosis. These results indicate that dynamic spatially restricted patterns of EIF4EBP1 phosphorylation may promote localized mRNA translation to support spindle formation, maintenance, function, and other nearby processes. Regulated EIF4EBP1 phosphorylation at the spindle may help coordinate spindle formation with progression through the cell cycle. The discovery that EIF4EBP1 may be part of an overall mechanism that integrates and couples cell cycle progression to mRNA translation and subsequent spindle formation and function may be relevant to understanding mechanisms leading to diminished oocyte quality, and potential means of avoiding such defects. The localization of maternal mRNAs at the spindle is evolutionarily conserved between mammals and other vertebrates and is also seen in mitotic cells, indicating that EIF4EBP1 control of localized mRNA translation is likely key to correct segregation of genetic material across cell types.