Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Matern Child Health J ; 27(9): 1472-1480, 2023 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37316688

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Social determinants of health (SDOH) and stress during pregnancy may contribute to adverse pregnancy outcomes. The objective of this in the field pilot project was to develop a comprehensive screening tool by combining existing validated screeners. Additionally, implement use of this tool within routine prenatal visits and assess feasibility. METHODS: Pregnant patients accessing prenatal care at a single site of an urban Federally Qualified Health Center were recruited during prenatal visits to complete a Social Determinants of Health in Pregnancy Tool (SIPT). SIPT combines a series of questions from existing and well-validated tools and consists of five domains: (1) perceived stress, (2) relationship and family stress, (3) domestic violence, (4) substance abuse, and (5) financial stress. RESULTS: Between April 2018 and March 2019, 135 pregnant participants completed SIPT. Ninety-one percent of patients scored positive on at least one screener, 54% to three or more screeners. CONCLUSIONS: Despite guidelines to screen for SDOH during pregnancy there is no universal tool. Our pilot project demonstrated the concurrent use of adapted screening tools where participants reported at least one area of potential stress, and that linking to resources at the time of a visit is plausible. Future work should examine if screening and point of care linkages of services improves maternal child outcomes.


Subject(s)
Domestic Violence , Social Determinants of Health , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Mass Screening , Pilot Projects , Pregnancy Outcome , Prenatal Care
2.
Am J Reprod Immunol ; 86(4): e13452, 2021 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34014593

ABSTRACT

PROBLEM: Current scientific guidelines recommend collecting placental specimens within two hours of delivery for gene expression analysis. However, collecting samples in a narrow time window is a challenge in the dynamic and unpredictable clinical setting, so delays in placental specimen collection are possible. The purpose of our analysis was to investigate temporal changes in placental gene expression by longitudinally sampling placentas over a 24 h period. METHOD OF STUDY: Eight placentas from individuals with uncomplicated, term pregnancies delivered by scheduled cesarean section were collected and sampled following the placental delivery and again at 1, 2, 4, 6, and 24 h post-delivery. At each time point, biopsies of chorionic villous tissue were taken from 3 cotyledons to account for intra-placental heterogeneity. The 3 biopsies from each time point were pooled prior to RNA extraction. Expression of 382 mRNA transcripts was quantified using the NanoString nCounter System. Fold change values were calculated for each time point relative to delivery, and a fold change threshold of 1.25 was used to determine a meaningful change from delivery. RESULTS: Based on a fold change threshold of 1.25, 84.3% of transcripts were stable for at least 1 h, 80.2% were stable for at least two hours, and 20.6% of transcripts were stable through the collection at 24 h. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that for some mRNA transcripts, expression changes as time to sample collection increases. We have developed a Web application to allow investigators to explore transcripts relevant to their research interests and to set appropriate thresholds to aid in determining whether placentas with delayed sample collection can be included in analyses (https://placentaexpression.foundationsofhealth.org/).


Subject(s)
Placenta/metabolism , Female , Gene Expression Regulation , Humans , Pregnancy , RNA, Messenger , Specimen Handling , Time Factors
3.
Matern Child Health J ; 25(9): 1455-1464, 2021 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34021436

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Women exposed to stressful events during pregnancy are thought to be at increased risk of adverse birth outcomes. However, studies investigating stressful events are often unable to control for important confounders, such as behavioral and genetic characteristics, or to isolate the impact of the stressor from other secondary effects. We used a discordant-sibling design, which provides stronger inferences about causality, to examine whether a widespread stressor with limited impact on day-to-day life (John F. Kennedy assassination) resulted in an increased risk of adverse birth outcomes. METHODS: Data were obtained from the Collaborative Perinatal Project, a prospective, multi-site cohort study conducted in the US from 1959 to 1965. Our analysis was restricted to singleton live births ≥24 weeks born before the assassination (n = 24,406) or in utero at the time (n = 5833). We also evaluated associations within siblings discordant for exposure (n = 1144). We used survival analysis to evaluate associations between exposure and preterm birth and marginal models to evaluate associations with birthweight and placental pathology. RESULTS: First trimester exposure was associated with preterm birth (hazard ratio (HR): 1.17; 95% CI: 1.05, 1.31). In the discordant-sibling model, the point estimate was similar (HR: 1.22; 95% CI: 0.36, 4.06). Third trimester exposure was associated with increased odds of fetal acute inflammation in the placenta (odds ratio (OR): 1.34, 95% CI: 1.05, 1.71). CONCLUSIONS FOR PRACTICE: First trimester exposure to an acute stressor was associated with preterm birth. We did not observe increased odds of placental pathology with first trimester exposure; however, stress may increase preterm birth risk through chronic placental inflammation, which was not evaluated in this sample.


Subject(s)
Pregnancy Outcome , Premature Birth , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Placenta , Pregnancy , Premature Birth/epidemiology , Prospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...