Staghorn stones in renal graft. Presentation on two cases report and review the bibliography.

OBJECTIVE: To describe two clinical cases of staghorn stones in renal allografts and to perform a review of this condition. METHODS/RESULTS: Case 1. 71-year-old woman with a renal transplant and recurrent UTI presented lithiasis in the graft on renal ultrasound. We started medical treatment and later one ESWL session was performed. The subsequent evolution of the patient was bad, requiring transplant nephrectomy. Case 2. 68-year old woman with renal transplant presented acute deterioration of renal function due to staghorn stones. Emergency ureteral catheter insertion was carried out, medical treatment was started and after one ESWL session she had a good subsequent evolution and normal function of the graft. CONCLUSIONS: Staghorn stones occupy most of the collecting system. They are usually made of struvite. They form in the context of urinary tract infections caused by urea splitting germs. Long-term persistence of staghorn calculi in the kidney causes functional and anatomical deterioration that can lead to kidney loss.

Litiasis coraliforme en injerto renal. presentación de dos casos clínicos y revisión de la bibliografía / Staghorn stones in renal graft. presentation on two cases report and review the bibliography

OBJETIVO: Describir los casos clínicos de dos pacientes trasplantadas renales con litiasis coraliforme del injerto. MÉTODOS/RESULTADOS: Caso 1. Mujer de 71 años trasplantada renal con episodios de ITU de repetición, presenta en ecografía doppler renal litiasis en el injerto. Se instaura inicialmente tratamiento médico y después se realiza LEOC. El desarrollo posterior es tórpido llevando la realización de trasplantectomía. Caso 2. Mujer de 68 años trasplantada renal que presenta deterioro agudo de la función renal por litiasis coraliforme. Se realiza cateterismo de urgencia, se inicia tratamiento médico y LEOC con buena evolución posterior y normofunción del injerto. CONCLUSIONES: Los cálculos coraliformes ocupan gran parte del sistema colector. Suelen estar constituidos por estruvita. Se forman en el contexto de infecciones urinarias producidas por gérmenes urolíticos. A largo plazo la persistencia de litiasis coraliforme en el riñón ocasiona un deterioro funcional y anatómico que puede llevar a la pérdida del riñón

OBJECTIVE: To describe two clinical cases of staghorn stones in renal allografts and to perform a review of this condition. METHODS/RESULTS: Case 1. 71-year-old woman with a renal transplant and recurrent UTI presented lithiasis in the graft on renal ultrasound. We started medical treatment and later one ESWL session was performed. The subsequent evolution of the patient was bad, requiring transplant nephrectomy. Case 2. 68-year-old woman with renal transplant presented acute deterioration of renal function due to staghorn stones. Emergency ureteral catheter insertion was carried out, medical treatment was started and after one ESWL session she had a good subsequent evolution and normal function of the graft. CONCLUSIONS: Staghorn stones occupy most of the collecting system. They are usually made of struvite. They form in the context of urinary tract infections caused by urea splitting germs. Long-term persistence of staghorn calculi in the kidney causes functional and anatomical deterioration that can lead to kidney loss

[Renal cell carcinoma molecular biology. Prognostic and therapeutic usefulness]. / Biología molecular en adenocarcinoma renal (RCC). Su utilidad pronóstica y terapéutica.

Renal cell adenocarcinoma requires different therapeutic pathways because it is one of the most therapy-resistant tumors, on the other hand it is biologically one of the most attractive tumors. Its pathological classification has a genetic base. There is an anomaly of the Von Hippel Lindau gene in 80% of adenocarcinomas, being this fact determinant to know the biological characteristics of tumor initiation and development, as well as the identification of factors susceptible to be used as therapeutic targets. Since 2005 a group of molecules have been used in the treatment of metastatic adenocarcinomas and, even though therapeutic results are significant but not clinically relevant yet, we are sure they are a key way for more efficient future developments. The present study tries to make a tour on the research of the biological anomalies in renal adenocarcinoma with special emphasis in the Von HippelLindau gene.

Biologia molecular en adenocarcinoma renal (RCC). Su utilidad pronóstica y terapéutica / Renal cell carcinoma molecular biology. Prognostic and therapeutic usefulness

El adenocarcinoma renal requiere caminos terapéuticos diferentes porque es uno de los tumores más resistentes a tratamiento, por contra es uno de los tumores biológicamente más atractivos. Su clasificación anatomopatológica tiene un fundamento genético. En el 80% de los adenocarcinomas existe una alteración del gen Von Hippel Lindau y este hecho ha sido determinante para conocer las características biológicas de la aparición y desarrollo tumoral así como la identificación de factores que pueden ser susceptibles de ser utilizados como dianas terapéuticas. Desde 2005 un grupo de moléculas se ha utilizado en el tratamiento de los adenocarcinomas metastásicos y aunque los resultados terapéuticos son significativos pero no todavía clínicamente relevantes, estamos seguros que son un camino clave para desarrollos posteriores más eficientes. El presente estudio pretende hacer un recorrido por la investigación de las alteraciones biológicas en adenocarcinoma renal haciendo especial énfasis en las alteraciones del gen Von Hippel Lindau(AU)

Renal cell adenocarcinoma requires different therapeutic pathways because it is one of the most therapy-resistant tumors, on the other hand it is biologically one of the most attractive tumors. Its pathological classification has a genetic base. There is an anomaly of the Von Hippel Lindau gene in 80% of adenocarcinomas, being this fact determinant to know the biological characteristics of tumor initiation and development, as well as the identification of factors susceptible to be used as therapeutic targets. Since 2005 a group of molecules have been used in the treatment of metastatic adenocarcinomas and, even though therapeutic results are significant but not clinically relevant yet, we are sure they are a key way for more efficient future developments. The present study tries to make a tour on the research of the biological anomaliesin renal adenocarcinoma with special emphasis in the Von HippelLindau gene(AU)

Impact of renal retransplantation on graft and recipient survival.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of retransplantation in graft and recipient survival. METHODS: We carried out a retrospective study in 419 renal transplants and studied the influence of retransplantation in graft and patient survival. A homogeneity study was performed between the two groups with a Student`s T and a chi-square tests. Graft survival analysis was performed with Kaplan-Meyer and log rank tests. RESULTS: Of 419 transplants, 370 (88.3%) were first transplantations, 45 (10.7%) second transplantations and 4(1%) third ones. Mean follow-up of the whole group was 72.5 months (±54.1 SD). There were no differences in follow-up between groups (Mean Follow-up 73.1 months ±54.4 SD in first transplantations vs. 61.6 months ±51.2 SD in repeat transplantation. p >0.05). The actuarial graft survival showed no differences between patients with first transplantation and those with a repeat one. [3 and 5 year SV of 89% (95% CI: 87-91%) and 84%(95% CI: 82-86%) Vs 88% (95% CI; 83-93%) and 85% (95% CI:i; 80-90%) respectively]. After adjusting for all the heterogeneity variables we still did not find differences on graft survival. The actuarial recipient survival showed no differences between patients with first transplantation and those with a repeat one. [3 and 5 year SV of 98% and 96% Vs.97%]. CONCLUSIONS: There are no differences of graft and recipient survival between patients with a first transplantation and those with a repeat one.

Impacto del retrasplante renal en la supervivencia del injerto y receptor / Impact of renal retransplantation on graft and recipient survival

OBJETIVO: Nuestro objetivo es valorar si un segundo o tercer trasplante tienen influencia en la supervivencia del injerto renal y en la del receptor.MÉTODOS: Analizamos retrospectivamente 419 trasplantes renales consecutivos realizados entre 1994 y 2010, analizando la influencia del retrasplante en la supervivencia del injerto renal. Se ha realizado un estudio de homogeneidad de los dos grupos mediante Tablas de contingencia para las variables cualitativas y t de student para las cuantitativas. La supervivencia y comparación de supervivencia con Kaplan-Meyer y log-rank..RESULTADOS: De los 419 trasplantes, 370 (88,3%) fueron primeros trasplantes 45(10,7%) segundos trasplantes y 4(1%) terceros. Media de seguimiento de todo el grupo de 72,5 meses (+/- 54,1 DE) y mediana de 68,8 meses( Rango de 0 a 188 meses ).No existen diferencias en el tiempo de seguimiento (Media del grupo de pacientes con un solo trasplante de 73,1 meses +/-54,4DE Vs. 61,6 meses +/-51,2DE del grupo de pacientes retrasplantados. p >0,05).El análisis de la supervivencia actuarial del injerto revela que no existen diferencias estadísticamente significativas entre los pacientes con un primer trasplante y los retrasplantados [SPV 89% (95% IC; 87- 91%) y 84% (95% IC; 82-86%) a los 3 y 5 años frente a 88% (95% IC; 83-93%) a los 3 años y 85% (95% IC; 80-90%) a los 5 años]. Al ajustar por las variables para las que los grupos no fueron homogeneos las diferencias se siguen manteniendo.El análisis de supervivencia de los receptores revela que tampoco existen diferencias entre los dos grupos [SPV del 98% y 96% a los 3 y 5 años en los primeros trasplantes frente a 97% a los 3 años y 5 años en los retrasplantados].CONCLUSIONES: No existen diferencias en la supervivencia del injerto ni en la de los receptores entre pacientes trasplantados por primera vez y aquellos que reciben un retrasplante(AU)

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of retransplantation in graft and recipient survival.METHODS: We carried out a retrospective study in 419 renal transplants and studied the influence of retransplantation in graft and patient survival.A homogeneity study was performed between the two groups with a Student`s T and a chi-square tests. Graft survival analysis was performed with Kaplan-Meyer and log rank tests.RESULTS: Of 419 transplants, 370 (88.3%) were first transplantations, 45(10.7%) second transplantations and 4(1%) third ones. Mean follow-up of the whole group was 72.5 months (+/-54.1 SD).There were no differences in follow-up between groups (Mean Follow-up 73.1 months +/-54.4 SD in first transplantations vs. 61.6 months +/-51.2 SD in repeat transplantation. p >0.05). The actuarial graft survival showed no differences between patients with first transplantation and those with a repeat one. [3 and 5-year SV of 89% (95% CI: 87-91%) and 84% (95% CI: 82-86%) Vs 88% (95% CI; 83-93%) and 85% (95% CI; 80-90%) respectively].After adjusting for all the heterogeneity variables we still did not find differences on graft survival.The actuarial recipient survival showed no differences between patients with first transplantation and those with a repeat one. [3 and 5 year SV of 98% and 96% Vs. 97%].CONCLUSIONS: There are no differences of graft and recipient survival between patients with a first transplantation and those with a repeat one(AU)

Association of crossed renal ectopia and aortic aneurism. Case report.

OBJECTIVE: Renal malformations are rare entities and rarely have clinical consequences. Crossed renal ectopia has an incidence of 1/2.000 autopsies. The association with aortic aneurysm is even more exceptional. METHODS: We present our case and perform a bibliographic review. RESULTS: To date and in our knowledge, seven cases of crossed renal ectopia associated with aortic aneurysm were described on the literature. This malformation makes the treatment of the aneurysm more complex. The possibility of renal function decrease caused by injuries to the renal arteries during the surgical procedure is always present. Because of this risk of injury of the kidney during surgery preoperative evaluation of the vascularization must include image technologies as the MRI, CT-angiography or conventional arteriography. During the aortic intervention vascular conservation must be performed and it is necessary to minimize the time of renal ischemia. CONCLUSIONS: The association of crossed renal ectopia and aortic aneurysm is a rare event. The surgical intervention of the aorta does not have to necessarily originate a loss of renal function. Anyway the worsening of the renal clearance must be foreseen.

Asociación entre ectopia renal cruzada con fusión y aneurisma aórtico. A propósito de un caso / Association of crossed renal ectopia and aortic aneurism. Case report

OBJETIVO: La malformación renal es una entidad poco frecuente y rara vez tiene traducción clínica. La ectopia renal cruzada tiene una incidencia de 1 de cada 2.000 autopsias. Su asociación con un aneurisma aórtico es todavía más excepcional.MÉTODOS: Presentamos nuestro caso y revisamos la literatura.RESULTADOS: Hasta la fecha y en nuestro conocimiento hay descritos 7 casos de ectopia renal cruzada con fusión asociados a aneurisma aórtico. Este fenómeno hace que el tratamiento del aneurisma sea más complejo pudiendo ocasionar una disminución de la función renal por lesiones en su vascularización. Para evitarlo, la vascularización renal debe ser estudiada preoperatoriamente mediante pruebas como la RM, el Angio-Tac o la Arteriografía. Durante la intervención sobre la aorta se deben realizar técnicas de conservación vascular y se debe de minimizar el tiempo de isquemia renal.CONCLUSIONES: La asociación de riñón ectópico cruzado y aneurisma de aorta es un evento raro. La cirugía o procedimientos sobre la aorta no tienen por qué acarrear una perdida de función renal importante y ésta debe ser prevista antes de la intervención (AU)

OBJECTIVE: Renal malformations are rare entities and rarely have clinical consequences. Crossed renal ectopia has an incidence of 1/2.000 autopsies. The association with aortic aneurysm is even more exceptional.METHODS: We present our case and perform a bibliographic review.RESULTS: To date and in our knowledge , seven cases of crossed renal ectopia associated with aortic aneurysm were described on the literature. This malformation makes the treatment of the aneurysm more complex. The possibility of renal function decrease caused by injuries to the renal arteries during the surgical procedure is always present. Because of this risk of injury of the kidney during surgery preoperative evaluation of the vascularization must include image technologies as the MRI, CT-angiography or conventional arteriography. During the aortic intervention vascular conservation must be performed and it is necessary to minimize the time of renal ischemia.CONCLUSIONS: The association of crossed renal ectopia and aortic aneurysm is a rare event. The surgical intervention of the aorta does not have to necessarily originate a loss of renal function. Anyway the worsening of the renal clearance must be foreseen (AU)

Hematocele / Hematocele

No disponible

No disponible