ABSTRACT
Introduction: Allergic rhinoconjunctivitis (AR) is an IgE-mediated inflammation of nasal and ocular mucosa after environmental allergen exposure, mainly by house dust mites (HDM). AR affects more than one third of the population worldwide and it is associated with loss of quality of life (QoL). Aim: To analyse the improvement in the QoL in 50 patients with moderate-persistent AR due to house HDM before and after receiving 1 year of subcutaneous specific aeroallergen immunotherapy treatment (SAIT). Material and methods: A prospective observational study was performed based on clinical practice in 50 patients with moderate-severe persistent AR due to HDM and candidates to SAIT. Forty-one patients completed the study. Patients were evaluated with the ESPRINT short-version QoL questionnaire, a score of medication use and visual analogue scale (VAS) symptom score, prior to and 12 months after SAIT. Results: Forty-one patients (25 women, mean age 26.9 years). Mean ESPRINT values prior to the start SAIT was 3.06 (moderate-severe) and 1 year after starting subcutaneous SAIT the mean value dropped in all patients to 0.88 (mild). The VAS score symptom dropped from 8.26 to 3.68. 97.56% of patients used 3 or more drugs (oral antihistamine, ophthalmic/intranasal antihistamine, intranasal corticosteroid and/or oral antileukotrienes) prior to starting SAIT, and 1 year after it, 58.53% used one on-demand medication to control symptoms, oral antihistamine or nasal spray, and not daily use. Conclusions: Subcutaneous SAIT seems to be a valid treatment in our patients with moderate-persistent AR due to HDM, since it reduces the ESPRINT score, VAS score and the use of medication. An improvement in the quality of life and satisfaction was observed by the patients themselves.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors are usually recommended as a safe alternative in patients with multiple hypersensitivity to non-steroidal antiinflammatory drugs. Nevertheless, both immediate and delayed hypersensitivity reactions have been described, and the possibility of cross-reactivity with sulphonamides. CASE REPORT: A 66-year-old patient who, after taking a celecoxib tablet, presented with latency of several hours a skin reaction. Previously, he had presented a minor reaction during treatment with etoricoxib without establishing the correlation at that time. The patient underwent an allergological study by means of skin tests with negative results and an oral challenged test with etoricoxib with positive results. Tolerance to sulfonamides was proven. CONCLUSIONS: We present a singular case of a cross-reactivity skin reaction to etoricoxib and celecoxib, suggesting the need to perform challenge tests to confirm the tolerance or not of each drug before allowing their use. On the contrary, trimethropim/sulfamethoxazole could be safely used in our patients, if needed.
INTRODUCCIÓN: Los inhibidores de la ciclooxigenasa-2 suelen indicarse en pacientes con hipersensibilidad múltiple a los antiinflamatorios no esteroides. Sin embargo, se han descrito reacciones de hipersensibilidad inmediata y retardada, además de posible reactividad cruzada con sulfonamidas. REPORTE DE CASO: Paciente masculino de 66 años, que acudió al servicio de Alergia por una reacción cutánea, luego de haber consumido un comprimido de celecoxib. Previamente, durante el tratamiento con etoricoxib, tuvo una reacción menor, sin establecer la correlación farmacológica. Se realizaron pruebas cutáneas (intraepidérmicas y epicutáneas), con resultados negativos, y un examen de exposición oral controlada con etoricoxib, con resultado positivo. Se comprobó la tolerancia a las sulfamidas. CONCLUSIONES: El caso de reacción cutánea, mediante reactividad cruzada, entre etoricoxib y celecoxib expuesto en este artículo sugiere la necesidad de realizar pruebas de provocación para confirmar la tolerancia de cada fármaco antes de su prescripción. Por el contrario, trimetropim-sulfametoxazol pueden indicarse con seguridad, si fuese necesario.
