Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Eur Urol Focus ; 4(3): 388-394, 2018 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28753799

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: CellDetect is a unique histochemical stain enabling color and morphological discrimination between malignant and benign cells based on differences in metabolic signature. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the present study was to validate the performance of this assay in a controlled, blinded, multicenter study. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The study, conducted in nine hospitals, included patients with documented history of bladder cancer, monitored for urothelial carcinoma (UCC) or scheduled for bladder cancer surgery. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Cystoscopy and/or biopsy were used as a reference standard to determine sensitivity and specificity. Smears were stained by CellDetect and interpreted by two cytologists blinded to the patient's final diagnosis. The findings were compared with those of standard urine cytology and BTA stat. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Two hundred and seventeen voided urine specimens were included. Ninety-six (44%) were positive by histology and 121 (56%) were negative by either cystoscopy or histology. The overall sensitivity of CellDetect was 84%. Notably, the sensitivity for detecting low-grade nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer tumors was greater than this of BTA stat (78% vs 54%) and more than two-fold higher compared with standard cytology (33%, p ≤ 0.05). The specificity was 84% in patients undergoing routine surveillance by cystoscopy. At a median follow-up of 9 mo, 21% of the patients with positive CellDetect and negative reference standard developed UCC, which was significantly higher compared with the 5% of the true negative cases. Limitations include the lack of instrumental urine samples and the lack of patients with nongenitourinary cancers in the study population. CONCLUSIONS: This study validates the performance of CellDetect as a urine-based assay to identify UCC in patients with history of bladder cancer. The high sensitivity was maintained across all cancer grades and stages without compromising the assay specificity. Further studies are required to test whether this novel stain can be incorporated in routine bladder cancer surveillance as a noninvasive alternative to cystoscopy. PATIENT SUMMARY: Surveillance of bladder cancer requires frequent invasive procedures. In the present study, we validate the ability of a novel biomarker to accurately identify early-stage tumors in urine specimens for the noninvasive monitoring of patients with history of bladder cancer.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Transitional Cell/pathology , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/pathology , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/urine , Urinary Bladder/pathology , Urothelium/pathology , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Biological Assay/methods , Carcinoma, Transitional Cell/surgery , Cystoscopy/methods , Cytodiagnosis/methods , Early Detection of Cancer/methods , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Sensitivity and Specificity , Urinary Bladder/surgery , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/diagnosis , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/surgery , Urine Specimen Collection/statistics & numerical data , Urothelium/surgery
2.
Urology ; 66(6): 1354-9, 2005 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16360483

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate a combined analysis approach that involves cytologic evaluation and fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis for detecting cancer cells in voided urine samples using an automated scanning station. METHODS: Voided urine samples from 41 patients suspected of having transitional cell carcinoma were stained with May-Grünwald Giemsa stain, scanned for atypical or suspicious cells, destained, and hybridized with a mixture of fluorescent-labeled probes. Samples were tested using either the UroVysion probe or by a mix of chromosomes 3, 7, and 17 centromeric probes. A case was regarded as positive when at least one cell was abnormal in both aspects, morphology and fluorescence in situ hybridization. Patients were evaluated concomitantly by cytology, cytoscopy, and biopsy, if indicated. RESULTS: Overall, 26 samples were positive by combined analysis. Biopsy-proven transitional cell carcinoma was positive by combined analysis in all cases (100%) and in 13 cases (61.9%) by cytology (P = 0.0133). The advantage of the combined analysis was noted mostly in low-grade and superficial tumors for which the sensitivity of cytology reached 30% (P = 0.023) and 27.27% (P = 0.0133), respectively. Specificity was 100%. CONCLUSIONS: Our results have shown that combined analysis for the presence of transitional cell carcinoma cells is a powerful tool, providing high sensitivity and specificity, and may offer a new scheme for bladder cancer management.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Transitional Cell/pathology , Carcinoma, Transitional Cell/urine , In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/pathology , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/urine , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...