Tyrosine kinase inhibition is an important factor for gene expression of CRTH2 in human eosinophils and lymphocytes: A novel mechanism for explaining eosinophils recruitment by the neuro-immune axis in allergic rhinitis.

We recently shown a novel neuro-immune competition between vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) and PGD2 for CRTH2 receptor, and that genistein augmented VIP and PGD2-induced eosinophil chemotaxis. However, there are neither studies on the CRTH2 gene expression in allergic rhinitis (AR) nor in the effect of tyrosine kinase inhibitors in CRTH2 gene regulation. Our Objectives were to study the gene expression modulation of CRTH2 receptor in AR patients and the effect of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) on CRTH2 gene modulation. Nasal provocation tests, ELISA, qRT-PCR, western blot, flow cytometry and chemotaxis assays in modified micro-Boyden chambers, were all used, to achieve our objectives. Herein we show that AR patients increased the amounts of VIP and PGD2 in their nasal secretions in the early phase reaction, however CRTH2 gene expression from leukocytes recovered in their nasal secretions was upregulated only during the late phase reaction. The TKIs; Genistein, Erbstatin and Herbimycin A, induced the gene expression of CRTH2 and increased the protein content of CRTH2 in both human lymphocytes and eosinophils. This was functional as PGD2/VIP-induced eosinophil chemotaxis was augmented by the TKIs and inhibited by pervanadate, the tyrosine phosphatase inhibitor. These results open channels for therapeutic modalities targeting CRTH2 molecules in AR.

Human cytomegalovirus and primary intracranial tumours: frequency of tumour infection and lack of correlation with systemic immune anti-viral responses.

AIMS: Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) is a ubiquitous beta human herpesvirus able to influence infected cell survival and proliferation and to modulate the host immune response. As there is accumulating evidence that HCMV is detected in primary intracranial astrocytic tumours, in this study we looked for the presence of HCMV in intracranial tumours and tried to correlate this eventual presence with the anti-HCMV systemic immunoreactivity and with the detection of HCMV in peripheral blood. METHODS: In this study, we analysed 43 glioblastomas (GBM), 14 oligodendrogliomas (OL) and 20 meningiomas (MG) by immunofluorescence (IF) targeting HCMV immediate early antigen (IE1) and by nested PCR (nPCR) amplifying HCMV glycoprotein B (gB). RESULTS: Detection of IE1 by IF showed the presence of HCMV in 70% of GBM, 57% of OL and 85% of MG, in contrast to gB nPCR, which detected HCMV in only 50% of GBM, 38% of OL and 46% of MG. Unexpectedly, HCMV DNA and antigens were detected within GBM, OL and MG of patients that exhibit negative viral serology. More surprisingly, PCR on the peripheral blood did not detect HCMV in patients with a HCMV-positive tumour. CONCLUSIONS: Our results are in agreement with previous observations demonstrating HCMV in glial tumours and highlight the presence of HCMV in meningiomas. We also showed that anti-HCMV specific systemic immunoreactivity and detection of HCMV in peripheral blood are not predictive of HCMV presence in primary intracranial tumours.