Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 343
Filter
4.
J Asthma ; 38(5): 377-89, 2001 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11515974

ABSTRACT

Asthma has been considered a rare disease in the elderly, but recent studies have shown that it is as common in the elderly as in the middle-aged population. Diagnosis of asthma is often overlooked in older patients, leading to undertreatment. Spirometry, determination of expiratory flow lability, and histamine challenge tests are tools that are as usefulfor the evaluation of elderly asthmatics as they areforyoungerpatients. Asthma is more severe in the elderly, especially in long-standing asthmatics. Treatment of asthma in the elderly should follow the same stepwise guidelines that are recommended for all age groups, though it will require more intense monitoring. An aggressive treatment approach to mild and moderate asthma in young people is the best hope of changing the future trends of asthma in the elderly.


Subject(s)
Anti-Asthmatic Agents/therapeutic use , Asthma/diagnosis , Asthma/drug therapy , Aged , Health Services for the Aged , Humans , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Spirometry
5.
Medicina (B Aires) ; 61(3): 257-61, 2001.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11474869

ABSTRACT

Asthma in the elderly is more severe and a decreased bronchodilating response has been suggested as a contributing factor. There is no agreement on the best way of expressing reversibility. The aim of this study was to evaluate bronchodilator response in elderly patients with asthma with different levels of airway obstruction and expressing reversibility by different indices. A total of 72 asthmatic patients were studied: (FEV1/FVC < 1.64 SEE below predicted). Two groups were considered: Group I: > or = 65 years (71.0 +/- 11.7 years; FEV1 54.0 +/- 16.7% of predicted) and Group II: < 40 years (23.0 +/- 7.7 years, FEV1 67.6 +/- 16.1%). Response to bronchodilators expressed as delta absolute, delta%predicted or delta%maximal was not different between the two groups. Reversibility expressed as delta%initial, however, was lower in younger patients (> 65 years: 22.2 +/- 16.6% vs 40 years: 11.8 +/- 9.9%, p = < 0.005). A covariance analysis was performed using baseline FEV1 as covariate and bronchodilator response was not different between the two groups. Neither delta absolute (r = 0.13, p = NS), delta%predicted (r = 0.06, p = NS) nor delta maximal (r = 0.09, p = NS) showed correlation with age. delta%initial showed weak but significant correlation with age (r = 0.28, p = < 0.05) and marked dependence on baseline FEV1 (r = 0.47, p = < 0.001). Bronchodilator reversibility in the elderly asthmatics is preserved. Expressing reversibility as delta%initial produces differences depending on baseline airway obstruction.


Subject(s)
Asthma/drug therapy , Bronchodilator Agents/therapeutic use , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Asthma/diagnosis , Bronchitis/diagnosis , Forced Expiratory Volume , Humans , Linear Models , Middle Aged , Severity of Illness Index , Statistics, Nonparametric
7.
Medicina [B Aires] ; 61(3): 257-61, 2001.
Article in Spanish | BINACIS | ID: bin-39502

ABSTRACT

Asthma in the elderly is more severe and a decreased bronchodilating response has been suggested as a contributing factor. There is no agreement on the best way of expressing reversibility. The aim of this study was to evaluate bronchodilator response in elderly patients with asthma with different levels of airway obstruction and expressing reversibility by different indices. A total of 72 asthmatic patients were studied: (FEV1/FVC < 1.64 SEE below predicted). Two groups were considered: Group I: > or = 65 years (71.0 +/- 11.7 years; FEV1 54.0 +/- 16.7


of predicted) and Group II: < 40 years (23.0 +/- 7.7 years, FEV1 67.6 +/- 16.1


). Response to bronchodilators expressed as delta absolute, delta


predicted or delta


maximal was not different between the two groups. Reversibility expressed as delta


initial, however, was lower in younger patients (> 65 years: 22.2 +/- 16.6


vs 40 years: 11.8 +/- 9.9


, p = < 0.005). A covariance analysis was performed using baseline FEV1 as covariate and bronchodilator response was not different between the two groups. Neither delta absolute (r = 0.13, p = NS), delta


predicted (r = 0.06, p = NS) nor delta maximal (r = 0.09, p = NS) showed correlation with age. delta


initial showed weak but significant correlation with age (r = 0.28, p = < 0.05) and marked dependence on baseline FEV1 (r = 0.47, p = < 0.001). Bronchodilator reversibility in the elderly asthmatics is preserved. Expressing reversibility as delta


initial produces differences depending on baseline airway obstruction.

12.
Medicina (B Aires) ; 60(1): 82-8, 2000.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10835703

ABSTRACT

The advance which resulted in the mean survival increase from 50 to 75 years between 1920 and 1990 also provoked the rise in health care costs, and the so called "health crisis". In order to contain it, market tactics were put to action, health care was considered a commodity, patients "consumers" and hospitals or physicians "providers". Economists, accountants and business advisors in charge of "Health Maintenance Organizations" (HMO) started the very profitable activity of intervening between patients and physicians. Rationing, use of general practice guides, suboptimal treatments, risk avoidance and other market tactics changed the practice of a profession into a business enterprise. The HMO decides if, when, how and how much will be given to any "consumer". Use of technology more impersonal and easily administered is the leading feature of to-day's medicine over the intellectual activity of the physician who hears, understands, makes the physical examination, diagnosis and treatment. The increasing depreciation of his task obliges the physician to enlarge the number and decrease his communication with his patients. His fiduciary obligation is subordinated to market needs and his practice increasingly compromises his moral integrity. The HMO boasts of the quality of the service given, this is the timely use of to-day's appropriate resources. Nobody wants the 1950 car or medical practice. Tomorrow's practice however depends on increasing knowledge, that is, on research, an activity which is not the HMO object. The academic-medical center, the very place where the interaction of teaching and investigating promotes the excellence is discriminated by the HMO because of its compromise with fiduciary activity imposed by 2500 years of jewish-christian philosophy. The future of these institutions (state's Cinderella's) is progressively compromised; when we loose them how long will it take to recover them? The politicians are always ready to create new hospitals, after they are built consuming large amounts of money, they become disinterested. All hospitals in our country are completely active only 4 hours/day, their physicians travel afterwards to their diverse places of activity consuming much of their time in getting there and complying with the bureaucratic tasks imposed by HMO. In our country with 14% unemployment and 1/3 of the population without any health coverage, the institution of universal health insurance is mandatory. Preventive medicine is not effective for people who lack the means for adequate nutrition, education or transportation, they do not visit doctors or use medicines.


Subject(s)
Delivery of Health Care , Ethics, Medical , Guideline Adherence , Insurance, Health , Physician-Patient Relations , Delivery of Health Care/economics , Health Maintenance Organizations/economics , Humans , Quality of Health Care
14.
Medicina [B Aires] ; 60(1): 82-8, 2000.
Article in Spanish | BINACIS | ID: bin-39892

ABSTRACT

The advance which resulted in the mean survival increase from 50 to 75 years between 1920 and 1990 also provoked the rise in health care costs, and the so called [quot ]health crisis[quot ]. In order to contain it, market tactics were put to action, health care was considered a commodity, patients [quot ]consumers[quot ] and hospitals or physicians [quot ]providers[quot ]. Economists, accountants and business advisors in charge of [quot ]Health Maintenance Organizations[quot ] (HMO) started the very profitable activity of intervening between patients and physicians. Rationing, use of general practice guides, suboptimal treatments, risk avoidance and other market tactics changed the practice of a profession into a business enterprise. The HMO decides if, when, how and how much will be given to any [quot ]consumer[quot ]. Use of technology more impersonal and easily administered is the leading feature of to-days medicine over the intellectual activity of the physician who hears, understands, makes the physical examination, diagnosis and treatment. The increasing depreciation of his task obliges the physician to enlarge the number and decrease his communication with his patients. His fiduciary obligation is subordinated to market needs and his practice increasingly compromises his moral integrity. The HMO boasts of the quality of the service given, this is the timely use of to-days appropriate resources. Nobody wants the 1950 car or medical practice. Tomorrows practice however depends on increasing knowledge, that is, on research, an activity which is not the HMO object. The academic-medical center, the very place where the interaction of teaching and investigating promotes the excellence is discriminated by the HMO because of its compromise with fiduciary activity imposed by 2500 years of jewish-christian philosophy. The future of these institutions (states Cinderellas) is progressively compromised; when we loose them how long will it take to recover them? The politicians are always ready to create new hospitals, after they are built consuming large amounts of money, they become disinterested. All hospitals in our country are completely active only 4 hours/day, their physicians travel afterwards to their diverse places of activity consuming much of their time in getting there and complying with the bureaucratic tasks imposed by HMO. In our country with 14


unemployment and 1/3 of the population without any health coverage, the institution of universal health insurance is mandatory. Preventive medicine is not effective for people who lack the means for adequate nutrition, education or transportation, they do not visit doctors or use medicines.

17.
Respir Med ; 93(9): 630-6, 1999 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10542976

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to define the most useful index of expressing bronchodilator response and to distinguish between asthma and COPD. A prospective study was carried out of bronchodilator response in 142 asthmatics and 58 COPD patients in a university hospital. Reversibility was expressed as: 1. absolute change (delta abs); 2. % of initial (delta %init); 3. % of predicted (delta %pred) and 4. % of maximum possible response (delta %max). Dependence on forced expirations volume in 1 sec (FEV1) as % of predicted and sensitivity and specificity for diagnosis of asthma were established. A relationship between delta abs and initial FEV1 was not found in asthma (delta abs vs. % initial FEV1. r = 0.07) or COPD (r = 0.02). delta %pred did not show a correlation in asthma (r = 0.10) or COPD (r = 0.06). delta %init was dependent on the baseline value in asthma (r = 0.38, P < or = 0.001) but not in COPD (r = 0.18, P = n.s.). delta max was dependent in both. The combination of best sensitivity and specificity to separate asthma and COPD was obtained with delta abs (70.4 or 70.6%). The worst specificity for asthma diagnosis was obtained with delta %init (50%). The best likelihood ratios were obtained with delta abs and delta %pred and the worst likelihood ratio with delta %init. delta %init is not recommended as an index for differential diagnosis between asthma and COPD; 2) delta %init overscores bronchodilator response in patients with low FEV1. The independence of each bronchodilator response index should be verified in clinical trials for each selected sample.


Subject(s)
Asthma/drug therapy , Bronchodilator Agents/therapeutic use , Lung Diseases, Obstructive/drug therapy , Aged , Asthma/physiopathology , Female , Forced Expiratory Volume/physiology , Humans , Lung Diseases, Obstructive/physiopathology , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Sensitivity and Specificity , Severity of Illness Index , Spirometry
18.
Respir Med ; 93(8): 523-35, 1999 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10542984

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study was to determine the impact upon classification of patients of the choice of reference equation and the criterion defining the lower limit of the normal range in clinical practice. One thousand consecutive spirometries were checked to calculate the predicted values [forced vital capacity (FVC) and forced expiratory volume in sec (FEV1)] in accordance with the equations by Morris, Cherniack, Crapo, Knudson and the Economic Community for Coal and Steel (ECCS). We quantified the difference between the predicted values obtained for each individual and each equation, determined the percentage of individuals whose classification might have changed from normal to abnormal when using a different equation and defined the lower limit of the normal range in accordance with the determination of 1. the 90% confidence interval or 2. 80% of predicted, comparing their differences. The greatest differences found were between the values given by Morris and Crapo's equations for male FEV1, between Morris and Cherniak for female FEV1 and male FVC and between Morris and Knudson for female FVC. Using 80% of predicted value for female FEV1, up to 35% of tests changed their classification from 'normal' to 'abnormal' upon changing the equation used. A high percentage of tests showed a lower limit of normal defined by the confidence interval under 80% and 70% of predicted value. This study emphasizes the importance of choosing the appropriate reference equation. We do not consider it acceptable to use a fixed percentage of the predicted value as the lower limit of normal because of the great number of patients found to be inappropriately classified.


Subject(s)
Spirometry/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Confidence Intervals , Decision Making , Female , Forced Expiratory Volume/physiology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Predictive Value of Tests , Reference Values , Spirometry/standards , Vital Capacity/physiology
19.
Medicina (B Aires) ; 59(3): 293-9, 1999.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10451572

ABSTRACT

Beta-agonists (beta 2) are the first treatment for acute asthma. Metered dose inhalers are preferable to nebulizers. During regular treatment, long-acting beta 2 show better results than sabutamol. Clinically relevant antiinflammatory activity has not been demonstrated. During regular treatment, tolerance to bronchodilator effects has not been detected but decrease of bronchoprotective effect is seen. These findings do not show clinical relevance. Short or long-acting beta 2 remain an appropriate and reliable treatment option for patients with asthma. Salmeterol and formoterol show similar action and adverse effects. The most rational treatment strategy seems to be: a) use inhaled steroids as the first and main regular treatment; b) when doses higher than 1,000-1,200 mcg/d of BCM or BUD are required, try long-acting beta-agonists; c) if that treatment is not effective enough, continue to increase inhaled steroid doses to identify patients responsive to higher doses.


Subject(s)
Adrenergic beta-Agonists/therapeutic use , Asthma/drug therapy , Bronchodilator Agents/therapeutic use , Acute Disease , Chronic Disease , Humans , Status Asthmaticus
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...