A three-dimensional algorithm for precise measurement of human auricle parameters.

Measurement of auricle parameters for planning and post-operative evaluation presents substantial challenges due to the complex 3D structure of the human auricle. Traditional measurement methods rely on manual techniques, resulting in limited precision. This study introduces a novel automated surface-based three-dimensional measurement method for quantifying human auricle parameters. The method was applied to virtual auricles reconstructed from Computed Tomography (CT) scans of a cadaver head and subsequent measurement of important clinically relevant aesthetical auricular parameters (length, width, protrusion, position, auriculocephalic angle, and inclination angle). Reference measurements were done manually (using a caliper and using a 3D landmarking method) and measurement precision was compared to the automated method. The CT scans were performed using both a contemporary high-end and a low-end CT scanner. Scans were conducted at a standard scanning dose, and at half the dose. The automatic method demonstrated significantly higher precision in measuring auricle parameters compared to manual methods. Compared to traditional manual measurements, precision improved for auricle length (9×), width (5×), protrusion (5×), Auriculocephalic Angle (5-54×) and posteroanterior position (23×). Concerning parameters without comparison with a manual method, the precision level of supero-inferior position was 0.489 mm; and the precisions of the inclination angle measurements were 1.365 mm and 0.237 mm for the two automated methods investigated. Improved precision of measuring auricle parameters was associated with using the high-end scanner. A higher dose was only associated with a higher precision for the left auricle length. The findings of this study emphasize the advantage of automated surface-based auricle measurements, showcasing improved precision compared to traditional methods. This novel algorithm has the potential to enhance auricle reconstruction and other applications in plastic surgery, offering a promising avenue for future research and clinical application.

Smart surgical glasses for orofacial cleft surgery training in high- and low-income countries: A proof of concept.

INTRODUCTION: The coronavirus 2019 pandemic urged us to find alternatives for education through remote proctoring and international surgical collaborations among high-, middle-, and low-income countries. Smart surgical glasses are promising for remote surgical education and international surgical collaborations. AIMS: This study aimed to assess the usability of smart surgical glasses during cleft surgery and explore their potential in remote surgical education and collaboration. METHODS: Six plastic surgical cases were randomly selected and recorded using the RODS&CONES glasses in 4K (3840 × 2160p). A 23-point questionnaire was sent to one plastic surgeon, one plastic surgery resident, and eight doctors who were not trained to critically appraise the video and audio quality of the smart surgical glasses and their applicability for remote surgical education. RESULTS: The participants indicated that the smart glasses had several significant advantages over conventional on-site education, such as facilitating a better view of the surgical field and providing possibilities for remote interaction. The audio quality was considered excellent. The main limitations were image stabilization issues and loss of video connection due to weak wireless fidelity. CONCLUSIONS: All participants appreciated the use of smart glasses for remote education and considered them a promising tool for enhancing the quality of surgical education. The glasses can enable remote assistance and education of local surgical residents and may facilitate sustainable surgical collaborations among high-, middle-, and low-income countries.

Interrater Reliability for Classifying Craniofacial Microsomia Severity: A Call for Objective Evaluation.

OBJECTIVE: The severity of craniofacial microsomia (CFM) is generally classified using the Orbit, Mandible, Ear, Soft tissue, Nerve (OMENS) classification score. The global assessment of the Phenotypic Assessment Tool for Craniofacial Microsomia (PAT-CFM), is a pictorial modification of the OMENS classification. The aim of this study was to assess the interrater reliability of the PAT-CFM global assessment score. DESIGN: In this prospective cohort study, three clinicians completed the global assessment form of the PAT-CFM. The mandible was classified based on orthopantomogram- and/or computed tomography images. PARTICIPANTS: Consecutive patients with CFM or microtia.Interrater agreement was calculated using the weighted Krippendorff alpha (α), with 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: In total, 53 patients were included (106 hemifaces). The reliabilities of the main classification components ranged from high for the mandible (α = 0.904 [95% CI 0.860-0.948]) and ear (α = 0.958 [95% CI 0.934-0.983]) subscales, to tentative for the orbital summary score (α = 0.682 [0.542-0.821]), and nerve summary score (α = 0.782 [0.666-0.900]) subscales. CONCLUSIONS: The reliability of the ear and radiographic mandible scales of the PAT-CFM global classification were high, while the orbit, facial nerve and soft tissue subscales may have limited reliability. Research focusing on radiographic severity scores for hypoplasia of the orbits and soft tissues, as well as objective measures for overall facial hypoplasia using non-ionizing forms of imaging for early classification, are warranted.

Objective evaluation of nonsurgical treatment of prominent ears: A systematic review.

Background: The prominent ear is a type of congenital ear deformity that can be corrected by a variety of nonsurgical treatments, such as splinting and the taping method. However, there is no objective evaluation method that is universally accepted. The aim of this review is to evaluate objective measurement methods that are used in the available literature to analyze nonsurgical treatment of prominent ears. Methods: A systematic review was performed in the MEDLINE and Embase databases in December 2022 and updated on April 2023 according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematics and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline. Any study using objective measurements (continuous variables such as distance and angle) to evaluate the effect of nonsurgical treatment of prominent ears was included. The Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal for case series was used for quality assessment. Results: A total of 286 studies were screened for eligibility, of which five articles were eligible for inclusion. All of the included studies were case series. The helix mastoid distance (HMD) is the most commonly used parameter to measure treatment outcome. Pinna and cartilage stiffness, length, and width were also used, but without clear statistical relevance. HMD was classified into grading groups (i.e. good, moderate, and poor) to evaluate the treatment's effect. Conclusion: Based on the included studies, objective measurements are rarely used, and when used, they are largely heterogeneous. Although HMD was the most frequent measurement used, all studies used different definitions for the measurement and grouped subsequent outcomes differently. Automated algorithms, based on three-dimensional imaging, could be used for object measurements in the nonsurgical treatment of prominent ears.

Objective quantitative methods to evaluate microtia reconstruction: A scoping review.

Background: Commonly used methods to evaluate auricles are subjective and are therefore not specific, comprehensive, and precise nor effective in the assessment of microtia reconstruction outcomes. This scoping review aimed to summarize the objective methods for the accurate evaluation of microtia reconstruction. Methods: We performed a scoping review of publications that used objective measurement methods to evaluate outcomes of microtia reconstruction according to the PRISMA-ScR guidelines. A systematic literature search was conducted in the Embase, PubMed, Cochrane, CNKI, and VIP databases, and literature references were screened for additional records. Studies that evaluated auricles after microtia reconstruction using quantitative anthropometric methods were included, and data on these methods were collected. Results: Twenty-five publications reported on quantitative objective outcome measurements. Thirteen studies evaluated auricular protrusion, three articles assessed the position or symmetry, and twelve studies reported on auricle size. The quantitative measurements of fine structures, such as the tragus and concha, were described in three studies. All described measurements used manual landmarking, where fifteen studies described well-defined landmarks, fifteen studies described poorly defined landmarks, and four studies used a combination of well and poorly defined landmarks. Conclusion: The objective evaluation of microtia reconstruction outcomes is hindered by significant heterogeneity of measurement methods. The measurement methods used for general auricular measurements (auricular protrusion, auriculocephalic angle, and size) used in microtia reconstruction were abundant, while measurements of auricular position and the fine structures of the auricle were limited. Three-dimensional imaging combined with computer analyses poses promising future alternatives.

Healthcare professionals' views on shared decision-making in plastic surgery in the Netherlands.

BACKGROUND: In shared decision-making (SDM), patients and healthcare professionals (HCPs) reach a joint clinical decision based on the best available evidence and the patient's preferences. SDM seems particularly valuable in plastic surgery, as often multiple treatment options are available. This cross-sectional online survey study aimed to assess HCPs' views and knowledge about SDM, identify facilitators and barriers of SDM, and determine specific requirements for SDM within plastic surgery. METHODS: Participants were HCPs working in plastic surgery in the Netherlands. Participant characteristics, SDM knowledge, perceived facilitators and barriers, and requirements were assessed using a custom-made online survey. Two researchers thematically analyzed qualitative data. RESULTS: We received 124 responses (with a response rate of 23%). Most respondents were attending plastic surgeons (79%), and 60% had more than 10 years of experience. Almost all respondents considered SDM important (91%), and most (78%) indicated that they applied SDM during consultations. However, only 15% of the HCPs showed a comprehensive understanding of the principle of SDM. Sufficient time, available sources of information (on treatment options and SDM), and decision support tools were identified as important requirements for SDM. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the positive attitudes toward SDM, there is a clear need for SDM training of HCPs, uniform sources of information and guidelines, and improved awareness and availability of decision support tools. National plastic surgery societies can play a crucial role in improving SDM-related knowledge, the availability of information and decision support tools, and the implementation of SDM in the field of plastic surgery.

Evaluating International Diagnostic, Screening, and Monitoring Practices for Craniofacial Microsomia and Microtia: A Survey Study.

To (1) appraise current international classification and clinical management strategies for craniofacial microsomia (CFM) and microtia, and (2) to assess agreement with the European Reference Network "European Guideline Craniofacial Microsomia" recommendations on screening and monitoring.This was a cross-sectional online survey study. The survey consisted of 44 questions on demographics, diagnostics and classification, obstructive sleep apnea, feeding difficulties, speech and language development, hearing, ocular abnormalities, visual development, orthodontic screening, genetic counselling, psychological wellbeing, and extracraniofacial anomalies.Respondents were participants of 3 international cleft and craniofacial conferences, members of the American Cleft Palate and Craniofacial Association and members of the International Society for Auricular Reconstruction. Respondents were requested to complete 1 questionnaire per multidisciplinary team.Fifty-seven responses were received from 30 countries (response rate ∼3%).The International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement diagnostic criteria were used by 86% of respondents, though 65% considered isolated microtia a mild form of CFM. The Orbit, Mandible, Ear, Facial Nerve and Soft Tissue classification system was used by 74% of respondents. Agreement with standardized screening and monitoring recommendations was between 61% and 97%. A majority of respondents agreed with screening for extracraniofacial anomalies (63%-68%) and with genetic counselling (81%).This survey did not reveal consistent agreement on the diagnostic criteria for CFM. Respondents mostly supported management recommendations, but frequently disagreed with the standardization of care. Future studies could focus on working towards international consensus on diagnostic criteria, and exploring internationally feasible management strategies.

Health-related quality of life and treatment effects in patients with well-differentiated gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEPNENs) are often diagnosed in an advanced stage. As the optimal sequence of therapy remains largely unclear, all treatment-related outcomes, including health-related quality of life (HRQoL) prospects, should be assessed according to patients' preferences. METHODS: A targeted search was performed in PubMed and EMBASE to identify studies on treatment effect and HRQoL, measured using the EORTC QLQ-C30 tool, in patients with advanced, well-differentiated GEPNENs. Study quality was assessed, and meta-analyses were performed for global health status/QOL and tumour response. RESULTS: The search yielded 1,322 records, and 20 studies were included, examining somatostatin analogues (SSA), peptide receptor radionuclide therapies (PRRT), chemotherapy, SSA-based combination therapies, and targeted therapies. Global HRQoL was stable, and rates for disease stabilisation were moderate to high across all treatments. Meta-analyses for global health status/QOL after SSA treatment were not significant (mean difference: -0.3 [95% CI: -1.3 to 0.7]). The highest pooled overall tumour response rate was 33% (95% CI: 24-45%) for PRRT. The highest pooled clinical benefit rate was 94% (95% CI: 65-99%) for chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: All treatments appeared beneficial for disease stabilisation while maintaining stable global health status/QOL. High-quality HRQoL reporting was lacking. HRQoL should be a central outcome next to well-established outcomes.

The important role of MDM2, RPL5, and TP53 in mycophenolic acid-induced cleft lip and palate.

ABSTRACT: Mycophenolate embryopathy (MPE) is a mycophenolic acid (MPA)-induced congenital malformation with distinctive symptoms. Cleft lip/palate (CLP) is one of the most common symptoms of MPE. The aim of this study was to screen and verify hub genes involved in MPA-induced CLP and to explore the potential molecular mechanisms underlying MPE.Overlapping genes related to MPA and CLP were obtained from the GeneCards database. These genes were further analyzed via bioinformatics. The Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichment analysis results were visualized with the Cytoscape ClueGO plug-in. Gene protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks were constructed based on data obtained from the Search Tool for the Retrieval of Interacting Genes/Proteins (STRING) database.Overall, 58 genes related to MPA and CLP were identified. The genes most relevant to MPA-induced CLP included ABCB1, COL1A1, Rac1, TGFß1, EDN1, and TP53, as well as the TP53-associated genes MDM2 and RPL5. GO analysis demonstrated gene enrichment regarding such terms as ear, mesenchymal, striated muscle, and ureteric development. KEGG analysis demonstrated gene enrichment in such pathways as the HIF-1 signaling pathway, glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchor biosynthesis, the TNF signaling pathway, and hematopoietic stem cell development.Bioinformatic analysis was performed on the genes currently known to be associated with MPA-induced CLP pathogenesis. MPA-induced CLP is mediated by multiple ribosome stress related genes and pathways. MDM2, RPL5 and TP53 could be the main contributor in this pathogenesis, along with several other genes. ABCB1 polymorphism could be related to the probability of MPA-induced CLP.

Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Image Quality in Motion Disorder Patients Scheduled for Deep Brain Stimulation Surgery.

BACKGROUND: To obtain magnetic resonance (MR) images of good quality for accurate target localization in deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery, sedation or anesthesia may be used, although their usefulness has not been proven. OBJECTIVE: To assess whether sedation or general anesthesia (GA) improve the quality of MR imaging (MRI). METHODS: The records of DBS procedures for Parkinson's disease (PD), dystonia, and essential tremor in our tertiary neurosurgical unit between January 2011 and June 2016 were reviewed. Adult patients with preoperative MR images were included. Patient records concerning MRI, surgery, adverse events, and clinical outcome were retrospectively scrutinized and analyzed. MR image quality was assessed by two independent radiologists. RESULTS: A total of 215 preoperative MR images for 177 DBS procedures were analyzed. The MRI sequences performed under GA were superior to those performed without anesthesia or under sedation (p < 0.01). Virtually all images captured under GA were of good quality, while the proportions among those captured with sedation or without anesthesia were <65%. Good image quality was not associated with better clinical outcome (>50% improvement in the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale III score) among patients with PD. CONCLUSION: GA was associated with better MRI sequences than intravenous sedation or no anesthesia.