ABSTRACT
LIDAR (Light Detection and Ranging) sensors are one of the leading technologies that are widely considered for autonomous navigation. However, foggy and cloudy conditions might pose a serious problem for a wide adoption of their use. Polarization is a well-known mechanism often applied to improve sensors' performance in a dense atmosphere, but is still not commonly applied, to the best of our knowledge, in self-navigated devices. This article explores this issue, both theoretically and experimentally, and focuses on the dependence of the expected performance on the atmospheric interference type. We introduce a model which combines the well-known LIDAR equation with Stocks vectors and the Mueller matrix formulations in order to assess the magnitudes of the true target signal loss as well as the excess signal that arises from the scattering medium radiance, by considering the polarization state of the E-M (Electro-Magnetic) waves. Our analysis shows that using the polarization state may recover some of the poor performance of such systems for autonomous platforms in low visibility conditions, but it depends on the atmospheric medium type. This conclusion is supported by measurements held inside an aerosol chamber within a well-controlled and monitored artificial degraded visibility atmospheric environment. The presented analysis tool can be used for the optimization of design and trade-off analysis of LIDAR systems, which allow us to achieve the best performance for self-navigation in all weather conditions.
ABSTRACT
Simple plastic face shields have numerous practical advantages over regular surgical masks. In light of the spreading COVID-19 pandemic, the potential of face shields as a substitution for surgical masks was investigated. In order to determine the efficacy of the protective equipment we used a cough simulator. The protective equipment considered was placed on a manikin head that simulated human breathing. Concentration and size distribution of small particles that reached the manikin respiration pathways during the few tens of seconds following the cough event were monitored. Additionally, water sensitive papers were taped on the tested protective equipment and the manikin face. In the case of frontal exposure, for droplet diameter larger than 3 µm, the shield efficiency in blocking cough droplets was found to be comparable to that of regular surgical masks, with enhanced protection for portions of the face that the mask does not cover. Additionally, for finer particles, down to 0.3 µm diameter, a shield blocked about 10 times more fine particles than the surgical mask. When exposure from the side was considered, the performance of the shield was found to depend dramatically on its geometry. While a narrow shield allowed more droplets and aerosol to penetrate in comparison to a mask under the same configuration, a slightly wider shield significantly improved the performance. The source control potential of shields was also investigated. A shield, and alternatively, a surgical mask, were placed on the cough simulator, while the breathing simulator, situated 60 cm away in the jet direction, remained totally exposed. In both cases, no droplets or particles were found in the vicinity of the breathing simulator. Conducted experiments were limited to short time periods after expiratory events, and do not include longer time ranges associated with exposure to suspended aerosol. Thus, additional evidence regarding the risk posed by floating aerosol is needed to establish practical conclusions regarding actual transmittance reduction potential of face shields and surgical face masks.
