Use of electronic alerts to enhance hand hygiene compliance and decrease transmission of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus in a hematology unit.

BACKGROUND: Hand hygiene (HH) compliance among health care workers (HCWs) has been historically low and hampered by poor surveillance methods. This study evaluated the use of an electronic device to measure and impact HH compliance. METHODS: The study is a prospective, interventional study in a 30-bed academic medical center hematology unit. Phase I of the study monitored baseline HH compliance, and phase II monitored HH compliance using automatic alerts. The primary outcome measure was HH compliance, and the secondary end point was nosocomial transmission of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE). RESULTS: Eight thousand two hundred thirty-five HH opportunities were measured during the study, with HH compliance improvement from 36.3% at baseline to 70.1% during phase II. The use of audible alerts improved HH compliance for both the day shift (odds ratio [OR], 3.6) and the night shift (OR, 5.9), as well as across rooms with higher HCW traffic (OR, 1.6) and lower HCW traffic (OR, 3.2). CONCLUSION: Electronic devices can effectively monitor HH compliance among HCWs and facilitate improved adherence to guidelines. Electronic devices improve HH compliance regardless of time of day or room location. The development of innovative devices to improve HH is required to validate the long-term implications of this methodology.

Assessment of materials commonly utilized in health care: implications for bacterial survival and transmission.

BACKGROUND: Contaminated environmental surfaces, equipment, and health care workers' hands have been linked to outbreaks of infection or colonization because of vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PSAE). Upholstery, walls, and flooring may enhance bacterial survival, providing infectious reservoirs. OBJECTIVES: Investigate recovery of VRE and PSAE, determine efficacy of disinfection, and evaluate VRE transmission from surfaces. METHODS: Upholstery, flooring, and wall coverings were inoculated with VRE and PSAE and assessed for recovery at 24 hours, 72 hours, and 7 days. Inoculated surfaces were cleaned utilizing manufacturers' recommendations of natural, commercial, or hospital-approved products and methods, and samples were obtained. To assess potential for transmission, volunteers touched VRE-inoculated surfaces and imprinted palms onto contact-impression plates. RESULTS: Twenty-four hours following inoculation, all surfaces had recovery of VRE; 13 (92.9%) of 14 surfaces had persistent PSAE. After cleaning, VRE was recovered from 7 (50%) surfaces, PSAE from 5 (35.7%) surfaces. After inoculation followed by palmar contact, VRE was recovered from all surfaces touched. CONCLUSION: Bacteria commonly encountered in hospitals are capable of prolonged survival and may promote cross transmission. Selection of surfaces for health care environments should include product application and complexity of manufacturers' recommendations for disinfection. Recovery of organisms on surfaces and hands emphasizes importance of hand hygiene compliance prior to patient contact.