Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Rev Med Chil ; 132(1): 41-6, 2004 Jan.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15379051

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: A WHO experts committee recommended the substitution of antirabic vaccines produced in nervous tissue, by vaccines produced in tissue cultures. AIM: To compare the immunogenic capacity of antirabic vaccines CRL (produced in nervous tissue) and Verorab (produced in tissue culture), used for pre-exposure prophylaxis in humans. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty four volunteers were immunized for this study. The first group, vaccinated with CLR was treated with a scheme of 4 subcutaneous peri umbilical doses in days 0, 3, 7 and 28. The second group, vaccinated with Verorab vaccine was treated with a scheme of 3 intramuscular doses in deltoid zone at days 0, 7 and 28. Blood samples were obtained at days 0, 7, 42 and 365 to measure neutralizing antibodies using the Inhibition of Fluorescent Focus Technique (RFFIT). RESULTS: At day seven, a primary non protective immunologic response was observed in both groups, with titers significantly higher in the group vaccinated with Verorab. At day 42, no differences were observed. At day 365, all subjects vaccinated with Verorab and 50% of individuals vaccinated with CRL had protective antibody titers (p <0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The vaccine produced in cell breeds (Verorab) produces a better an faster immunologic response compared to the CRL vaccine.


Subject(s)
Rabies Vaccines/immunology , Adult , Animals , Animals, Suckling , Antibodies, Viral/isolation & purification , Brain/immunology , Brain/virology , Chlorocebus aethiops , Female , Humans , Male , Mice , Nerve Tissue , Tissue Culture Techniques , Vero Cells
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL