Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
Mult Scler Relat Disord ; 77: 104865, 2023 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37418929

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic created an urgency for an effective vaccine. The FDA approved vaccines offered by Pfizer-BioNTech (BNT162b2), ModernaTX (mRNA-1273) and Janssen/Johnson & Johnson (Ad26.COV2.S) have shown minimal side effects (SE) in general population studies. Multiple sclerosis (MS) patients were not specifically represented in the above studies. The MS community is interested in how these vaccines behave in people with MS. In this study, we compare the SE experienced by MS to that of the general population after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and evaluate their risk of relapses or pseudo-relapses. METHODS: A retrospective, single-site, cohort study of 250 MS patients who received the initial cycle of FDA approved SARS-CoV-2 vaccines with 151 of whom also received an additional booster dose. SE resulting immediately after COVID-19 vaccination were collected as part of the standard clinical care during patient visits. RESULTS: Out of the studied 250 MS patients, 135 received the first and second doses of BNT162b2 with less than 1% and 4% pseudo-relapses respectively and 79 received the third BNT162b2 dose with a pseudo-relapse rate of 3%. 88 received the mRNA-1273 vaccine with a pseudo-relapse frequency of 2% and 5% after the first and second doses respectively. 70 patients had the mRNA-1273 vaccine booster with a 3% pseudo-relapse rate. 27 received the Ad26.COV2.S first dose, 2 of whom received a second Ad26.COV2.S booster dose, with no reports of MS worsening. No acute relapses were reported in our patient population. All patients experiencing pseudo-relapse symptoms returned to baseline within 96 h. CONCLUSION: COVID-19 vaccine is safe in patients with MS. Cases of temporary worsening of MS symptoms following SARS-CoV-2 are rare. Our findings support those reported by other recent studies and the CDC recommendation for MS patients to receive the FDA-approved COVID-19 vaccines, including the boosters.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions , Multiple Sclerosis , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , 2019-nCoV Vaccine mRNA-1273 , Ad26COVS1 , BNT162 Vaccine , Incidence , Cohort Studies , Multiple Sclerosis/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Vaccination/adverse effects
2.
J Telemed Telecare ; 27(7): 436-443, 2021 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31635531

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to assess individual regions of the Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score in noncontrast head computed tomography interpretations using a smartphone in a telestroke network, by comparison to a medical monitor. METHODS: The review board of our institution approved this retrospective study. A factorial design with 188 patients, four radiologists and two reading systems was used. Accuracy and reliability were evaluated. RESULTS: Very good interobserver agreements were observed on the total Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score for both the medical and smartphone reading systems, with intraclass correlation coefficients of 0.91 and 0.84 respectively. Interobserver agreements were moderate to very good for the medical reading system (all intraclass correlation coefficients >0.74), whereas they were fair to very good for the smartphone (intraclass correlation coefficients ranged from 0.31-0.81). All intraobserver agreements were good (intraclass correlation coefficient >0.64), except for internal capsule (0.48) and M2 (0.55) regions. The areas under the receiver-operating curve ranged from 0.69-0.89 for the medical system, while for the smartphone ranged from 0.44-0.86. No statistical differences were observed between medical and smartphone reading systems for each region (all p > 0.05). DISCUSSION: If radiologists are better trained in the evaluation of the lesions in the insula, the internal capsule and the M2 regions, the total and the dichotomised Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score will be more precise. Hence, ruling out contraindications to thrombolysis administration will be improved, allowing assessment of head computed tomography in a telestroke network using a smartphone to be a common practice.


Subject(s)
Smartphone , Stroke , Alberta , Humans , Reading , Reproducibility of Results , Retrospective Studies , Stroke/diagnostic imaging , Stroke/therapy , Tomography, X-Ray Computed
3.
J Med Internet Res ; 22(7): e18058, 2020 07 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32716302

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Health care delivery for cerebrovascular diseases is a complex process, which may be improved using telestroke networks. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this work was to establish and implement a protocol for the management of patients with acute stroke symptoms according to the available treatment alternatives at the initial point of care and the transfer possibilities. METHODS: The review board of our institutions approved this work. The protocol was based on the latest guidelines of the American Heart Association and American Stroke Association. Stroke care requires human and technological resources, which may differ according to the patient's point of entry into the health care system. Three health care settings were identified to define the appropriate protocols: primary health care setting, intermediate health care setting, and advanced health care setting. RESULTS: A user-friendly web-based telestroke solution was developed. The predictors, scales, and scores implemented in this system allowed the assessment of the vascular insult severity and neurological status of the patient. The total number of possible pathways implemented was as follows: 10 in the primary health care setting, 39 in the intermediate health care setting, and 1162 in the advanced health care setting. CONCLUSIONS: The developed comprehensive telestroke platform is the first stage in optimizing health care delivery for patients with stroke symptoms, regardless of the entry point into the emergency network, in both urban and rural regions. This system supports health care personnel by providing adequate inpatient stroke care and facilitating the prompt transfer of patients to a more appropriate health care setting if necessary, especially for patients with acute ischemic stroke within the therapeutic window who are candidates for reperfusion therapies, ultimately contributing to mitigating the mortality and morbidity associated with stroke.


Subject(s)
Brain Ischemia/therapy , Cerebrovascular Disorders/therapy , Delivery of Health Care/methods , Stroke/therapy , Telemedicine/methods , Algorithms , Female , Humans
4.
AJR Am J Roentgenol ; 214(4): 877-884, 2020 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32045304

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE. The objective of this study was to assess the accuracy and reliability of IV thrombolysis recommendations made after interpretation of head CT images of patients with symptoms of acute stroke displayed on smartphone or laptop reading systems compared with those made after interpretation of images displayed on a medical workstation monitor. MATERIALS AND METHODS. This retrospective study was institutional review board-approved, and the requirement for informed consent was waived. We used a factorial design including 2256 interpretations (188 patients, four neuroradiologists, and three reading systems). To evaluate the reliability, we calculated the intraobserver and interobserver agreements using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and the following interpretation variables: hemorrhagic lesions, intraaxial neoplasm, stroke dating (acute, subacute, and chronic), hyperdense arteries, and infarct size assessment. Accuracy equivalence tests were performed for the IV thrombolysis recommendation; for this variable, sensitivity, specificity, and ROC curves were evaluated. RESULTS. Good or very good interobserver and intraobserver agreements were obtained after interpretation of each variable. The IV thrombolysis recommendation showed very good interobserver agreements (ICC ≥ 0.85) and very good intraobserver agreements (ICC ≥ 0.81). For the IV thrombolysis recommendation, the AUC values (0.83-0.84) and sensitivities (0.94-0.95) were equivalent among all the reading systems at a 5% equivalent threshold. CONCLUSION. Our study found that mobile devices are reliable and accurate to help stroke teams to decide whether to administer IV thrombolysis in patients with acute stroke.


Subject(s)
Brain Ischemia/diagnostic imaging , Brain Ischemia/drug therapy , Microcomputers , Smartphone , Stroke/diagnostic imaging , Thrombolytic Therapy , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Reproducibility of Results , Retrospective Studies
5.
J Am Coll Radiol ; 16(11): 1561-1571, 2019 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31072776

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To evaluate and compare the clinical performance of observers interpreting head CT images from patients with symptoms of acute stroke with a medical workstation or a smartphone or laptop reading system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Our institutional review board approved this retrospective study and waived the requirement for informed consent. We employed a factorial design including 2,256 interpretations (188 patients × 4 neuroradiologists × 3 reading systems). Accuracy equivalence tests, at a threshold of 5% and 10%, were performed for the following variables: detection of imaging contraindications for intravenous recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator administration (eg, hemorrhagic lesions), ischemic lesions, hyperdense arteries, and acute ischemic lesions. For each clinical variable, the sensitivity, specificity, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were evaluated. RESULTS: For each variable, the shapes of the ROC curves were very similar for all of the reading systems, indicating similar observer performance with different specificities and sensitivities. For all the clinical variables, the areas under the ROC curves were equivalent for all of the reading systems at a 10% threshold and were equivalent at a 5% threshold for hemorrhagic lesions, hyperdense middle cerebral artery, and acute ischemic lesion in the middle cerebral artery territory. There was no more than 30 seconds of difference between the reading time of the mobile devices compared with that for the medical workstation. CONCLUSION: The results of this pilot study showed equivalent diagnostic accuracy when using smartphone and laptops compared with medical monitors to interpret head CT images of patients with symptoms of acute stroke.


Subject(s)
Computers, Handheld/statistics & numerical data , Smartphone/statistics & numerical data , Stroke/diagnostic imaging , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Workplace/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cohort Studies , Colombia , Databases, Factual , Female , Head/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pilot Projects , ROC Curve , Retrospective Studies , Sensitivity and Specificity , Stroke/physiopathology
6.
Colomb. med ; 49(4): 254-260, Oct.-Dec. 2018. tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-984305

ABSTRACT

Abstract Aim: This study compares the reliability of brain CT interpretations performed using a diagnostic workstation and a mobile tablet computer in a telestroke context. Methods: A factorial design with 1,452 interpretations was used. Reliability was evaluated using the Fleiss' kappa coefficient on the agreements of the interpretation results on the lesion classification, presence of imaging contraindications to the intravenous recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (t-PA) administration, and on the Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS). Results: The intra-observer agreements were as follows: good agreement on the overall lesion classification (κ= 0.63, p<0.001), very good agreement on hemorrhagic lesions (κ= 0.89, p<0.001), and moderate agreements on both without acute lesion classification and acute ischemic lesion classification (κ= 0.59 and κ= 0.58 respectively, p<0.001). There was good intra-observer agreement on the dichotomized-ASPECTS (κ= 0.65, p<0.001). Conclusions: The results of our study allow us to conclude that the reliability of the mobile solution for interpreting brain CT images of patients with acute stroke was assured, which would allow efficient and low-cost telestroke services.


Resumen Objetivo: Este estudio compara la confiabilidad de interpretaciones de TAC de cráneo simple realizadas utilizando una estación de trabajo de diagnóstico y un computador tableta en un contexto de teleACV. Métodos: Se utilizó un diseño factorial con 1,452 interpretaciones. La confiabilidad se evaluó utilizando el coeficiente kappa de Fleiss en las concordancias sobre los resultados de la interpretación en la clasificación de la lesión, la presencia de contraindicaciones en la imagen para la administración intravenosa del activador del plasminógeno tisular (AP-t) y con el Alberta Stroke Programme Early CT Score (ASPECTS). Resultados: Se obtuvieron las siguientes concordancias intraobservadores: buena concordancia en la clasificación general de la lesión (κ= 0.63, p<0.001), muy buena concordancia en lesiones hemorrágicas (κ= 0.89, p< 0.001), y concordancia moderada en ambos sin clasificación de lesión aguda y clasificación de lesión isquémica aguda (κ= 0.59 y κ= 0.58 respectivamente, p<0.001). Hubo una buena concordancia intraobservadores en el ASPECTS dicotomizado (κ= 0.65, p<0.001). Conclusiones: Los resultados de nuestro estudio permiten concluir que la confiabilidad de la solución móvil para la interpretación de imágenes de TAC de cráneo simple de pacientes con accidente cerebrovascular agudo (ACV) estaba garantizada, lo que permitiría servicios de teleACV eficientes y de bajo costo.


Subject(s)
Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Brain/diagnostic imaging , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Stroke/diagnostic imaging , Cell Phone , Brain/pathology , Observer Variation , Thrombolytic Therapy/methods , Cross-Sectional Studies , Reproducibility of Results , Retrospective Studies , Tissue Plasminogen Activator/administration & dosage , Stroke/drug therapy , Fibrinolytic Agents/administration & dosage , Administration, Intravenous
7.
Colomb Med (Cali) ; 49(4): 254-260, 2018 Dec 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30700917

ABSTRACT

AIM: This study compares the reliability of brain CT interpretations performed using a diagnostic workstation and a mobile tablet computer in a telestroke context. METHODS: A factorial design with 1,452 interpretations was used. Reliability was evaluated using the Fleiss' kappa coefficient on the agreements of the interpretation results on the lesion classification, presence of imaging contraindications to the intravenous recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (t-PA) administration, and on the Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS). RESULTS: The intra-observer agreements were as follows: good agreement on the overall lesion classification (κ= 0.63, p<0.001), very good agreement on hemorrhagic lesions (κ= 0.89, p<0.001), and moderate agreements on both without acute lesion classification and acute ischemic lesion classification (κ= 0.59 and κ= 0.58 respectively, p<0.001). There was good intra-observer agreement on the dichotomized-ASPECTS (κ= 0.65, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The results of our study allow us to conclude that the reliability of the mobile solution for interpreting brain CT images of patients with acute stroke was assured, which would allow efficient and low-cost telestroke services.


OBJETIVO: Este estudio compara la confiabilidad de interpretaciones de TAC de cráneo simple realizadas utilizando una estación de trabajo de diagnóstico y un computador tableta en un contexto de teleACV. MÉTODOS: Se utilizó un diseño factorial con 1,452 interpretaciones. La confiabilidad se evaluó utilizando el coeficiente kappa de Fleiss en las concordancias sobre los resultados de la interpretación en la clasificación de la lesión, la presencia de contraindicaciones en la imagen para la administración intravenosa del activador del plasminógeno tisular (AP-t) y con el Alberta Stroke Programme Early CT Score (ASPECTS). RESULTADOS: Se obtuvieron las siguientes concordancias intraobservadores: buena concordancia en la clasificación general de la lesión (κ= 0.63, p<0.001), muy buena concordancia en lesiones hemorrágicas (κ= 0.89, p< 0.001), y concordancia moderada en ambos sin clasificación de lesión aguda y clasificación de lesión isquémica aguda (κ= 0.59 y κ= 0.58 respectivamente, p<0.001). Hubo una buena concordancia intraobservadores en el ASPECTS dicotomizado (κ= 0.65, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONES: Los resultados de nuestro estudio permiten concluir que la confiabilidad de la solución móvil para la interpretación de imágenes de TAC de cráneo simple de pacientes con accidente cerebrovascular agudo (ACV) estaba garantizada, lo que permitiría servicios de teleACV eficientes y de bajo costo.


Subject(s)
Brain/diagnostic imaging , Cell Phone , Stroke/diagnostic imaging , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Administration, Intravenous , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Brain/pathology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Fibrinolytic Agents/administration & dosage , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Observer Variation , Reproducibility of Results , Retrospective Studies , Stroke/drug therapy , Thrombolytic Therapy/methods , Tissue Plasminogen Activator/administration & dosage
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...