ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Echocardiography is routinely used to identify potential cardiac sources of embolism (CSE) in the acute phase of ischemic stroke (IS). We know that transoesophageal echography (TEE) is superior to detect CSE than transthoracic echography (TTE). However, the indications of each technique remain controversial. We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic yield (DY) and the therapeutic impact (TI) of echocardiography (both techniques combined) in IS and to analyze impact of clinical factors on these values. METHODS: We included consecutive IS patients over a period of 22 months. All patients underwent TTE, and selected patients (young or with a high suspicion of cardioembolic origin) then underwent TEE. DY (detection of CSE) and TI (introduction of oral anticoagulant, closure of patent foramen ovale and targeted cardiologic consultation) were systematically evaluated. RESULTS: We analyzed 300 patients (mean age 61 years). All patients underwent TTE and 127 patients underwent TTE and TEE. Echocardiography overall detected CSE in 22% of patients with a TI in 11% of all cases. The TI was higher in patients less than or equal to 55 years of age. In contrast to other studies, the DY and TI of echocardiography were not associated with vascular risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: Echocardiography, as currently practiced in our stroke unit, allows detection of CSE in one patient in five, and leads to change in therapy in half of these cases. Our results suggest that TTE should be used for all patients admitted for IS, and to limit the use of TEE to younger patients.
