Lipoarabinomannan mannose caps do not affect mycobacterial virulence or the induction of protective immunity in experimental animal models of infection and have minimal impact on in vitro inflammatory responses.

Mannose-capped lipoarabinomannan (ManLAM) is considered an important virulence factor of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. However, while mannose caps have been reported to be responsible for various immunosuppressive activities of ManLAM observed in vitro, there is conflicting evidence about their contribution to mycobacterial virulence in vivo. Therefore, we used Mycobacterium bovis BCG and M. tuberculosis mutants that lack the mannose cap of LAM to assess the role of ManLAM in the interaction of mycobacteria with the host cells, to evaluate vaccine-induced protection and to determine its importance in M. tuberculosis virulence. Deletion of the mannose cap did not affect BCG survival and replication in macrophages, although the capless mutant induced a somewhat higher production of TNF. In dendritic cells, the capless mutant was able to induce the upregulation of co-stimulatory molecules and the only difference we detected was the secretion of slightly higher amounts of IL-10 as compared to the wild type strain. In mice, capless BCG survived equally well and induced an immune response similar to the parental strain. Furthermore, the efficacy of vaccination against a M. tuberculosis challenge in low-dose aerosol infection models in mice and guinea pigs was not affected by the absence of the mannose caps in the BCG. Finally, the lack of the mannose cap in M. tuberculosis did not affect its virulence in mice nor its interaction with macrophages in vitro. Thus, these results do not support a major role for the mannose caps of LAM in determining mycobacterial virulence and immunogenicity in vivo in experimental animal models of infection, possibly because of redundancy of function.

IgG fc receptors provide an alternative infection route for murine gamma-herpesvirus-68.

BACKGROUND: Herpesviruses can be neutralized in vitro but remain infectious in immune hosts. One difference between these settings is the availability of immunoglobulin Fc receptors. The question therefore arises whether a herpesvirus exposed to apparently neutralizing antibody can still infect Fc receptor(+) cells. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Immune sera blocked murine gamma-herpesvirus-68 (MHV-68) infection of fibroblasts, but failed to block and even enhanced its infection of macrophages and dendritic cells. Viral glycoprotein-specific monoclonal antibodies also enhanced infection. MHV-68 appeared to be predominantly latent in macrophages regardless of whether Fc receptors were engaged, but the infection was not abortive and new virus production soon overwhelmed infected cultures. Lytically infected macrophages down-regulated MHC class I-restricted antigen presentation, endocytosis and their response to LPS. CONCLUSIONS: IgG Fc receptors limit the neutralization of gamma-herpesviruses such as MHV-68.

CD4+ T cells specific for a model latency-associated antigen fail to control a gammaherpesvirus in vivo.

CD4(+) T cells play a major role in containing herpesvirus infections. However, their cellular targets remain poorly defined. In vitro CD4(+) T cells have been reported to kill B cells that harbor a latent gammaherpesvirus. We used the B cell-tropic murine gammaherpesvirus-68 (MHV-68) to test whether this also occurred in vivo. MHV-68 that expressed cytoplasmic ovalbumin (OVA) in tandem with its episome maintenance protein, ORF73, stimulated CD8(+) T cells specific for the H2-K(b)-restricted OVA epitope SIINFEKL and was rapidly eliminated from C57BL/6 (H2(b)) mice. However, the same virus failed to stimulate CD4(+) T cells specific for the I-A(d)/I-A(b)-restricted OVA(323-339) epitope. We overcame any barrier to the MHC class II-restricted presentation of an endogenous epitope by substituting OVA(323-339) for the CLIP peptide of the invariant chain (ORF73-IRES-Ii-OVA), again expressed in tandem with ORF73. This virus presented OVA(323-339) but showed little or no latency deficit in either BALB/c (H2(d)) or C57BL/6 mice. Latent antigen-specific CD4(+) T cells therefore either failed to recognize key virus-infected cell populations in vivo or lacked the effector functions required to control them.