ABSTRACT
AIMS: The relationship between caffeine consumption and the occurrence of arrhythmias remains controversial. Despite this lack of scientific evidence, counselling to reduce caffeine consumption is still widely advised in clinical practice. We conducted a systematical review and meta-analysis of interventional studies of the caffeine effects on ventricular arrhythmias. METHODS AND RESULTS: The search was performed on Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane database, and terms related to coffee, caffeine, and cardiac arrhythmias were used. Methodological quality was assessed based on The Cochrane Collaboration recommendations and the ARRIVE guidelines. There were 2016 citations retrieved on the initial research. After full-text assessment, seven human and two animal studies were included in the meta-analysis. In animal studies, the main outcome reported was the ventricular fibrillation threshold. We observed a significant mean difference of -2.15 mA (95% CI -3.43 to -0.87; I(2) 0.0%, P for heterogeneity = 0.37). The main outcome evaluated in human studies was the rate of ventricular premature beats (VPBs). The overall relative risk for occurrence of VPBs in 24 h attributed to caffeine exposure was 1.00 (95% CI 0.94-1.06; I(2) 13.5%, P for heterogeneity = 0.32). Sensitivity analysis for caffeine dose, different designs, and subject profile was performed and no major differences were observed. CONCLUSION: Our meta-analysis demonstrates that data from human interventional studies do not show a significant effect of caffeine consumption on the occurrence of VBPs. The effects observed in animal studies are most probably the result of very high caffeine doses that are not regularly consumed in a daily basis by humans.
Subject(s)
Caffeine/adverse effects , Central Nervous System Stimulants/adverse effects , Heart Conduction System/drug effects , Heart Rate/drug effects , Ventricular Premature Complexes/chemically induced , Animals , Caffeine/administration & dosage , Central Nervous System Stimulants/administration & dosage , Heart Conduction System/physiopathology , Humans , Odds Ratio , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Ventricular Premature Complexes/physiopathologyABSTRACT
AIMS: We investigated whether the combination of beta(1)-Gly389Arg and GNB3 C825T, two genetic polymorphisms strictly related to adrenergic system modulation, could act as predictors of appropriate therapies in patients with heart failure (HF) using implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs). METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with HF and ICD implantation for primary and secondary prevention were studied. All ICD therapies were registered and classified as appropriate (secondary to ventricular tachycardia) or inappropriate (others). Genetic analysis was performed by polymerase chain reaction and restriction fragment length polymorphism methods. Seventy-three patients with mean left ventricular ejection fraction of 35 +/- 11% were evaluated. Overall, 35 ICD therapies occurred during follow-up in 31 (42.5%) patients. Twenty-four therapies (33%) were appropriate, and 11 (15%) were inappropriate. Individual analysis of each polymorphism only identified T825 carriers of GNB3 C825T as predictor of appropriate shocks. The combined presence of risk genotypes (Arg389 of the beta(1)-Gly389Arg and T825 of the GNB3 C825T) identified patients with higher risk of appropriate shocks. Patients with two at-risk genotypes had a survival rate free of appropriate shocks lower than those with none or only one of these markers (87 vs. 54%, respectively; log-rank statistic = 0.006). Using a Cox regression model, each at-risk genotype was associated with an increment of risk of appropriate ICD shocks (odds ratio = 3.9, 95% confidence interval of 1.3-12.0; P = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Genetic polymorphisms of the adrenergic system may help to identify HF patients who are more likely to receive appropriate ICD therapies. Further studies are necessary to determine the clinical applicability of these polymorphisms as predictors of arrhythmias.
