A new scale for the assessment of performance and capacity of hand function in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy: reliability and validity studies.

BACKGROUND: In hemiplegic children, the recognition of the activity limitation pattern and the possibility of grading its severity are relevant for clinicians while planning interventions, monitoring results, predicting outcomes. OBJECTIVE: Aim of the study is to examine the reliability and validity of Besta Scale, an instrument used to measure in hemiplegic children from 18 months to 12 years of age both grasp on request (capacity) and spontaneous use of upper limb (performance) in bimanual play activities and in ADL. DESIGN: Psychometric analysis of reliability and of validity of the Besta scale was performed. SETTING: Outpatient study sample METHODS: Reliability study: A sample of 39 patients was enrolled. The administration of Besta scale was video-recorded in a standardized manner. All videos were scored by 20 independent raters on subsequent viewing. 3 raters randomly selected from the 20-raters group rescored the same video two years later for intra-rater reliability. Intra and inter-rater reliability were calculated using Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) and Kendall's coefficient (K), respectively. Internal consistency reliability was assessed using Alpha's Chronbach coefficient. Validity study: a sample of 105 children was assessed 5 times (at t0 and 2, 3, 6 and 12 months later) by 20 independent raters. Each patient underwent at the same time to QUEST and Besta scale administration and assessment. Criterion validity was calculated using rho-Pearson coefficient. RESULTS: Reliability study: The inter-rater reliability calculated with Kendall's coefficient resulted moderate K=0.47. The intra-rater (or test-retest) reliability for 3 raters was excellent (ICC=0.927). The Cronbach's alpha for internal consistency was 0.972. Validity study: Besta scale showed a good criterion validity compared to QUEST increasing by age and severity of impairment. Rho Pearson's correlation coefficient r was 0.81 (P<0.0001). Limitations. Besta scales in infants finds hard to distinguish between mild to moderately impaired hand function. CONCLUSIONS: Besta scale scoring system is a valid and reliable tool, utilizable in a clinical setting to monitor evolution of unimanual and bimanual manipulation and to distinguish hand's capacity from performance.

The perception of involved professionals towards research feasibility and usefulness: lessons from the Multi-Site Trial on Efficacy of Constraint Induced Movement Therapy in Children with Hemiplegia.

BACKGROUND: In the last decades, the world of rehabilitation has been more and more calling for clear evidence to support intervention and numerous research programs have been developed. At stake, relatively little research on opinions and attitude of rehabilitation personnel involved in research conducted in real clinical settings has been carried out. AIM: To explore the opinion of professionals involved in a national clinical trial on research. DESIGN: Multicentre cross-sectional study. SETTING: 19 rehabilitation centres/services (4 research institutes, 15 local rehabilitation services). POPULATION: All professional participating to a multi-centre clinical trial on the effects of Constraint Induced Movement Therapy on children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy. METHODS: A 15-questions questionnaire inquiring feasibility, usefulness, products, costs, judgement and perceptions about clinical research in rehabilitation was administered. RESULTS: Among those working in one of the 19 rehabilitation centres part of the multicentric study, 76 professionals were asked to fill in the questionnaire. 68 professionals answered (89.4% of response rate). More than 75% of the sample thinks that its rehabilitation centre is suited to develop clinical research. Research results useful for the development of their daily activities (new tools for the assessment of children, to demonstrate the efficacy of a new treatment option and to learn a new way of working, and to strengthen the ties within the working team). Research is costly in terms of personal time and effort, but it can modify the rehabilitation praxis (assessment tools, the relationship with colleagues/patients). 98% of the interviewees declared the willingness to participate to other research projects. CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT: This survey highlights the importance of conducting research in local rehabilitation services, not only in terms of generation of new evidences, but also in terms of building networks, sharing experiences and knowledge, connecting with centers of excellence and providing a specific training for research conduction.