Impact of Pharmacist Transitions of Care on 30-Day Readmissions Within a Primary Care-Based Accountable Care Organization.

Previous studies in the ambulatory care setting have shown inconsistent results in regard to, or with respect to pharmacist telephonic transitions of care (TOC) encounters and reduction in 30-day readmission rates. No studies that have been completed within an accountable care organization (ACO) evaluating the impact of telephonic TOC encounters performed by a pharmacist have been identified. The objective of this study was to analyze the impact of clinical pharmacy telephonic TOC encounters on readmission rates within a primary care-based ACO. In this retrospective chart review, data for those who had a pharmacist telephonic TOC encounter and those who had an attempt were collected. The primary outcome of this study was all-cause 30-day readmission rate. Secondary outcomes included 30-day readmission rate for targeted disease states, time to readmission, and readmission reason the same as previous discharge reason. For subjects who received a telephonic TOC encounter, pharmacist intervention type and provider acceptance of intervention(s) were described. For the final analysis, 154 encounters were included, 83 encounters in the telephonic TOC encounter group, and 71 did not receive a telephonic TOC encounter. The 30-day readmission rates were similar among those who received a telephonic TOC encounter and those who did not: the difference was not significant (15.7% vs. 28.2%; P = 0.059). There was also no statistical difference in the secondary outcomes. Even so, the results of this study suggest that performing a pharmacist telephonic TOC encounter in a primary care-based ACO setting has the potential to reduce 30-day readmission rates and further research appears to be warranted in this important area of practice.

Real-World Analysis of Long-Acting and NPH-Containing Insulins on Glycemic Control.

Introduction Affordability of insulin products has become a concern in the past several years as the average price of various insulin products has increased. While awaiting legislation at the federal level that would address issues leading to high insulin costs, providers may have shifted prescribing practices to prescribe the lowest-priced insulin products to achieve patients' treatment goals. Objective To compare the prevalence of hypoglycemic events between patients receiving lower-cost neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH)-containing human insulins and higher-cost long-acting insulin analogs in Medicare Part D enrollees within a management services organization, as well as assessing glycemic control and changes in body mass index. Methods This was a multicenter, retrospective study conducted at three primary care clinics. The co-primary outcomes were percent difference of documented mild and severe hypoglycemic events between individuals receiving NPH-containing human insulin and long-acting insulin. Results A total of 72 patients met inclusion criteria and were receiving NPH-containing human insulins or the long-acting insulin analogs, 15 and 57 patients, respectively. Severe hypoglycemic events occurred in 3.5% vs 0% of the long-acting insulin analog and NPH-containing human insulin group, respectively (P = 0.999). Mild hypoglycemic episodes were experienced by 31.6% versus 33.3% of long-acting insulin analog and NPH, respectively (P = 0.539). For secondary outcomes, no difference was observed in glycemic control outcomes across insulin groups. Conclusion Among Medicare Part D patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, the use of NPH-containing human insulins was not associated with an increased risk of mild or severe hypoglycemia-related episodes or reduced glycemic control compared with long-acting insulin. Study findings suggest that lower-cost, NPH-containing human insulins may be an alternative to higher-cost, long-acting insulin analogs.

Evaluating Pharmacist-Driven Interventions in a Primary Care Setting to Improve Proportion of Days Covered and Medication Adherence.

BACKGROUND: Medication nonadherence is the leading cause of poor health outcomes and increased risk of hospitalizations. Previous studies have shown that pharmacist interventions can help improve medication adherence and CMS quality measures. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of clinical pharmacists' interventions on medication adherence and PDC scores for ACEi/ARBs, statins, and noninsulin antidiabetic medications in the primary care setting. METHODS: This observational study was conducted at four primary care clinics to evaluate PDC scores pre- and post-pharmacist interventions from April 2020 to December 2020. Eligible patients were Humana Part D beneficiaries with a baseline PDC score <85%. The primary outcome of this study was to evaluate the average change in final PDC scores, and 1-month change in PDC scores following a pharmacist intervention. Secondary outcomes were number and types of adherence barriers identified, interventions provided by the pharmacist, and barriers and interventions category (pharmacy, patient or physician-related). RESULTS: A total of 89 barriers were identified and 208 interventions were completed. A statistically significant difference in the average change of final PDC score from baseline was seen among those on ACEi/ARBs (72.5 to 78.0, p = 0.004) and statins (73.3 to 76.6, p < 0.001). Similarly, a statistically significant change was observed from baseline to 1-month PDC among those on ACEi/ARBS (72.5 to 75.4, p = 0.001) and statins (73.3 to 74.9, p < 0.001). Conclusion: Pharmacists located in a primary care setting improved medication adherence and PDC score for patients on ACEIs/ARBs and statins.

Evaluating a Pharmacist-Led Intervention on Cardiovascular- and Diabetes-Related Quality Measures in a Primary Care-Based Accountable Care Organization.

BACKGROUND: The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) publishes quality measures to gauge performance in Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs). ACO-27 (Diabetes Mellitus: Hemoglobin A1c Poor Control) and ACO-41 (Diabetes: Eye Exam), are 2 components for the Diabetes Composite measure. ACO-42 focuses on Statin Therapy for the Prevention and Treatment of Cardiovascular (CV) Disease. There are limited studies regarding the pharmacist role in CV and Diabetes Management in the ACO primary care setting. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of pharmacist-led interventions on CV- and diabetes-related CMS quality measures within a primary care-based ACO. METHODS: This retrospective pre-post intervention study included 3 primary care-based ACO offices. Patients who met eligibility criteria for CMS quality measures ACO-27, -41 and -42 were included. Pharmacist interventions occurred in December 2018. The study co-primary outcomes were the percentage of patient meeting ACO-27/-41 (composite diabetes-related) and -42 (statin-related) CMS quality measures in the pre-intervention compared to the post-intervention phases. RESULTS: Of 105 patients meeting study inclusion criteria, 77.1% were on statin therapy prior to intervention. After pharmacist intervention, the prevalence of patients on statin therapy increased to 80.0% (p = 0.083). All patients had a HbA1c less than 9% pre-intervention. Sixty-one (58.1%) patients had a documented dilated eye exam prior to intervention. Post-intervention, the prevalence of exams increased to 73.3% (p < 0.0005). CONCLUSIONS: Pharmacists can assist primary care providers in the ACO setting meet CV- and diabetes-related CMS quality measures, demonstrating the value of the pharmacist in value-based health care settings.

Effects of a Therapeutic Interchange Between Branded and Generic Inhaled Therapy on Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.

Objective To evaluate the difference in the occurrence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbations six months preconversion compared with six months postconversion from the branded inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting beta 2-agonist inhalers to the generic fluticasone/salmeterol inhalers. Design Retrospective cohort study using a six-month pre-/post-test design Setting Three primary care offices within a Management Service Organization (MSO) in South Florida. Patients, Participants Patients were included in the study if they had a diagnosis of COPD (in electronic medical record [EMR]), were at least 18 years of age, were under the care of a provider at one of the three primary care clinics within an MSO, and were switched from a branded ICS/LABA inhaler to a generic ICS/LABA inhaler between May 2019 and February 2020. This study included a total of 22 patients. Interventions Not applicable; this was a retrospective chart review. Main Outcome Measure The prevalence of COPD exacerbations leading to hospitalizations, emergency room visits, urgent care visits, or clinic visits. Results In this study, 10 (45.5%) patients experienced at least one exacerbation while on generic inhaler therapy compared with four (18.2%) patients while on branded inhaler therapy (P = 0.05). Those on a generic inhaler were 3.8 times more likely to have a COPD exacerbation. Conclusion While changing patients from branded to generic inhalers may be appealing because of the potential benefits in cost-reduction, the results of this study conclude that the inhaler switch may lead to increased exacerbations. Prescribers need to be aware of potential complications that may be related to a therapeutic interchange.